Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF THE SOLAR TRACKING PV SYSTEMS IN ESKİŞEHİR REGION

Pages
209–217
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The averaged total generation values are calculated and it is revealed that the tracking system provides approximately 33 % higher electricity generation than the same capacity fixed PV panels for Eskişehir region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, efficiency analysis of the solar tracking photovoltaic (PV) system in Eskişehir region is considered for onsite real solar power generation values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is shown that the tracking system's power generations are always higher than fixed one, but increased yield ratio is changing according to weather conditions (sunny or cloudy times).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The averaged total generation values are calculated and it is revealed that the tracking system provides approximately 33 % higher electricity generation than the same capacity fixed PV panels for Eskişehir region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, efficiency analysis of the solar tracking photovoltaic (PV) system in Eskişehir region is considered for onsite real solar power generation values. It is shown that the tracking system's power generations are always higher than fixed one, but increased yield ratio is changing according to weather conditions (sunny or cloudy times). In order to make a fair analysis/comparison, all the instantaneous real solar power generations between 1 July and 30 October 2016 are used to figure out the ratio of sunny and cloudy days of the whole year. The averaged total generation values are calculated and it is revealed that the tracking system provides approximately 33 % higher electricity generation than the same capacity fixed PV panels for Eskişehir region.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİLİK, Ü. B., FİLİK, T. (2022). EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF THE SOLAR TRACKING PV SYSTEMS IN ESKİŞEHİR REGION. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 209–217. https://ajindex.com/articles/438502

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Başaran Filik Ü, Filik T, Gerek ÖN. New Electric Transmission Systems-Experiences from Turkey, Wiley, 2015
  2. Başaran Filik Ü, Filik T. A Solar Project for Eskişehir Airport, 3rd International 100% Renewable Energy Conference, İstanbul, Turkey, 27-29 June, 2013
  3. Başaran Filik Ü, Ayvazoğluyüksel Ö, Filik T. A.Ü. İki Eylül Kampüsünde Güneş/Rüzgâr Verilerini İzleme Ve Hibrit Enerji Sisteminin Kurulması, Elektr-Mesl Gel ve Ar Der, 1, 2015, 48-54
  4. Ayvazoğluyüksel Ö., Başaran Filik Ü. Remotely monitoring and modeling of renewable energy of a controlled home placed in A.U. İki Eylül Campus. 8th Ege Energy Symposium and Exhibition. Afyonkarahisar, 2016, Turkey
  5. Bentaher H, Kaich H, Ayadi N, Hmouda M. B, Maalej A, Lemmer U. A simple tracking system to monitor solar PV panels, Ener Con and Manag.2014;78: 872-875
  6. Eke R. Senturk A. Performance comparison of a double-axis sun tracking versus fixed PV system, Sol Ener 2012; 86:2665-2672
  7. Senpinar A, Cebeci, M. Evaluation of power output for fixed and two-axis tracking PV arrays. App Ener, 2012; 92:677-685
  8. Sharaf Eldin SA, Abd-ElhadyMS, Kandil HA, Feasibility of solar tracking systems for PV panels in hot and cold regions, Renew Ener; 2016, 85:228-233 [9] Dakkak M., Babeli A, Design and performance study of a PV tracking system (100W- 24Vdc/220Vac), Ener Proced. 2012:19: 91-95
  9. Koussa M., Haddadi M., Saheb D., Malek A., Hadji S. Sun tracker systems effects on flat plate photovoltaic PV systems performance for different Sky States: a case of an arid and hot climate, Ener Proced;2012:18: 817-838
  10. Lazaroiu GC, Longo M, Roscia M, Pagano M. Comparative analysis of fixed and sun tracking low power PV systems considering energy consumption. Ener Conv and Man;.2015;92:143-148
  11. Cruz-Peragón F, Pedro J, Peláez C, Francisco A, López-García R, Palomar JM. An approach to evaluate the energy advantage of two axes solar tracking systems in Spain. Appl Energy 2011; 88:5131-5142
  12. Serhan M, El-Chaar L. Two axis sun tracking system: comparison with a fixed system. In: Proceedings of international conference on renewable energies and power quality, Granada, Spain, 23-25 March 2010.