SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 5

A MODIFIED T-SCORE FOR FEATURE SELECTION

Semra ERPOLAT TAŞABAT
Hüseyin BUDAK
Pages
845–852
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to this study, the result of the suggested feature selection method is statistically more successful than t-score.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, an alternative approach to t-score method, one of the feature selection methods, has been suggested and some analyses have been executed in order to compare t-score method and our approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with the purpose of this study, the first 50, 100, 150 and 200 features for each data set has been selected, in consequence, 24 data subsets have been created.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to this study, the result of the suggested feature selection method is statistically more successful than t-score.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, an alternative approach to t-score method, one of the feature selection methods, has been suggested and some analyses have been executed in order to compare t-score method and our approach. When comparing them, commonly used data sets in data mining studies, Arcene, Gisette and Madelon have been used. In line with the purpose of this study, the first 50, 100, 150 and 200 features for each data set has been selected, in consequence, 24 data subsets have been created. The classification accuracies of t-score and suggested method has been compared by using these data subsets. When calculating the classification accuracies, two commonly used methods in literature, Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines have been used. According to this study, the result of the suggested feature selection method is statistically more successful than t-score.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞABAT, S. E., BUDAK, H. (2022). A MODIFIED T-SCORE FOR FEATURE SELECTION. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 5, 845–852. https://ajindex.com/articles/438337

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ladha L, Deepa T. Feature selection methods and algorithms, International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering 2011; 3: 1787-1797
  2. Guyon I, Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003; 3: 1157-1182
  3. Forman G. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification, Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003; 3: 1289-1305
  4. SPSS Inc, SPSS Clementine 12.0 Algorithms Guide. SPSS Inc, USA: Chicago, 2007
  5. Saeys Y, Inza I, Larranaga P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics, Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 2507-2517
  6. Yıldız O, Tez M, Bilge HŞ, Akcayol MA, Güler İ. Meme kanseri sınıflandırması için gen seçimi (Gene selection for breast cancer), IEEE 20nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference; 18-20 April 2012; Muğla, Turkey: IEEE, p.p 988-991
  7. Novakavic J, Strbac P, Bulatovic D. Toward optimal feature selection using ranking methods and classification algorithms, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research 2011; 21: 119-135
  8. Hall MA. Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning, PhD, The University of Waikato, New Zealand: Hamilton, 1999
  9. Kira K, Rendell LA. The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm, AAAI 1992; 2: 129-134
  10. Ding C, Peng H. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data, Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 2005; 3: 185-205
  11. Whitney AW. A direct method of nonparametric measurement selection, IEEE Transactions on Computers 1972; 20: 1100-1103
  12. Pudil P, Novovicova J, Kittler J. Floating search methods in feature selection, Pattern Recognition Letters 1994; 15: 1119-1125
  13. Stearns SD. On selecting features for pattern classifiers, 3rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition; 8-11 November 1976; Coronado, California, USA: pp 71-75
  14. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhil S, Vapnik V. Gene Selection for cancer classification using support vector machines, Machine Learning 2002; 46: 389-422
  15. Liu H, Yu L. Towards integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering knowledge and data engineering, IEEE Transactions on Computers 2005; 17: 491-502. [16] http://www.nipsfsc.ecs.soton.ac.uk/datasets/ [accessed 11.01.2015] [17] http://www.nipsfsc.ecs.soton.ac.uk/papers/NIPS2003-Datasets.pdf [accessed 11.01.2015] [18] Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, Ste