Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

EN-ROUTE AIRSPACE CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC FLOW ENHANCEMENT USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS

Pages
39–58
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Multiple entry point configurations provided up to 10% increase in throughput and significant reductions in average delay per aircraft compared to the single point entry configuration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Air transportation industry has gone under a rapid and continuous growth for the last four decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and aircraft manufacturers anticipate that annual growth rate of air traffic will be 4.5-5.1% until 2030.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Multiple entry point configurations provided up to 10% increase in throughput and significant reductions in average delay per aircraft compared to the single point entry configuration.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2030 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Air transportation industry has gone under a rapid and continuous growth for the last four decades. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and aircraft manufacturers anticipate that annual growth rate of air traffic will be 4.5-5.1% until 2030. Airspace capacity management becomes more critical for the safety, efficiency and sustainable growth of the industry. Enroute areas cover the largest portion of the controlled airspace and are subdivided into small segments referred to as 'en-route sectors'. Each sector is usually monitored and controlled by a single air traffic controller in the relevant Area Control Center (ACC). When air traffic demand reaches or exceeds the available en-route sector capacity, serious aircraft delays occur at airports or in airspace. When air traffic demand reaches to the available en-route sector capacity, serious aircraft delays occur at airports or in airspace. These delays lead not only to system-wide congestions but also interruptions in air traffic services, airline flight schedules and airport operations. Therefore, these interruptions result in increased operational costs, passenger dissatisfaction and air traffic controller workload. This study presents a multiple entry point assignment model based on a genetic algorithm to minimize delays and increase throughput of a generic high-altitude en-route sector. The proposed approach intends to provide a framework for a decision support system based on flexible and dynamic direct route utilization for air traffic and capacity management. The available single entry point sector configuration and its multiple entry point assignment alternatives were compared for various traffic scenarios. Multiple entry point configurations provided up to 10% increase in throughput and significant reductions in average delay per aircraft compared to the single point entry configuration.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETEK, C., ÇEÇEN, R. K. (2022). EN-ROUTE AIRSPACE CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC FLOW ENHANCEMENT USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 39–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/438298

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aybek Cetek F, Cetek C. Simulation modelling of runway capacity for flight training airports. The Aeronaut J 2014; 118:143-154
  2. Airbus. Delivering the Future - Global Market Forecast 2011-2030. Blagnac Cedex, France: Airbus, 2011
  3. Boeing. Current Market Outlook 2011-2030. Seattle, WA, USA: Boeing, 2011
  4. ICAO. Global and Regional 20 Year Forecasts - Pilots, Maintenance Personnel - Air Traffic Controllers. Doc 9956. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization Publications, 2011
  5. Cavcar A. Temel Hava Trafik Yönetimi. Eskişehir, Türkiye: Anadolu Universitesi Yayınları, 1998
  6. ICAO. Annex 11 Air Traffic Services, Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization Publications, 2001
  7. Janic M. Air Transport System Analysis and Modelling. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Gordon Breach Science Publishers, 2000
  8. Aybek Cetek F. A simulation model proposal for dynamic gate assignment in terminal control areas. PhD, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey, 2015 (thesis in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  9. Janic M, Tosic V. (1991). En route sector capacity model. Transport Sci 1991; 25: 299-307
  10. Barnhart C, Smith B. Quantitative Problem Solving Methods in the Airline Industry. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2012
  11. Odoni AR. The flow management problem in air traffic control. In Odoni AR, Bianco L, Szegö G, editors. Flow Control of Congested Networks. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1987. pp. 269-288
  12. Terrab M, Odoni AR. Strategic flow management for air traffic control. Oper Res 1993; 41:138- 152
  13. Richetta O, Odoni AR. Solving optimally the static ground-holding policy problem in air traffic control. Transport Sci 1993; 27: 228-238
  14. Richetta O, Odoni AR. Dynamic solution to the ground-holding problem in air traffic control. Transport Res A-Pol 1994; 28: 167-185
  15. Vranas PBM, Bertsimas D, Odoni AR. Dynamic ground-holding policies for a network of airports. Transport Sci 1994; 28: 275-291
  16. Mukherjee A, Hansen M. (2007). A dynamic stochastic model for the single airport ground holding problem. Transport Sci 2007; 41: 444-456
  17. Mao Z-H, Feron E, Bilimoria, K. Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under decentralized conflict avoidance rules. IEEE T Intell Transp 2001; 2: 101-109
  18. Dugail D, Feron E, Bilimoria K. Stability of intersecting aircraft flows using heading change maneuvers for conflict avoidance. In: IEEE 2002 American Control Conference; 8-10 May 2002; An