Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

THE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE DEMAND FOR TURKEY USING UTILITY THEORY AND SYSTEM SIMULATION

Pages
115–121
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that while an increase in income level and expected claim severity causes an increase in the demand, an increase in premium level causes a decrease in demand

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the demand for comprehensive insurance is analysed using utility theory and system simulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Simulation assumptions and input-output variables are determined using the real data set from a Turkish insurance company and the report about the insurance activities in Turkey for year 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that while an increase in income level and expected claim severity causes an increase in the demand, an increase in premium level causes a decrease in demand
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the demand for comprehensive insurance is analysed using utility theory and system simulation. A simulation study is performed to assess the behaviour of individuals with different income levels for the demand of comprehensive insurance. Simulation assumptions and input-output variables are determined using the real data set from a Turkish insurance company and the report about the insurance activities in Turkey for year 2014. The effects of income level, expected claim severity and premium level on the demand for insurance are investigated. It is concluded that while an increase in income level and expected claim severity causes an increase in the demand, an increase in premium level causes a decrease in demand

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRKAĞAÇ, M., GENÇTÜRK, Y., ERDEMİR, Ö. K. (2022). THE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE DEMAND FOR TURKEY USING UTILITY THEORY AND SYSTEM SIMULATION. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 115–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/438296

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Guiso L, Jappelli T. Background uncertainty and the demand for insurance against insurable risks. Centre for studies in economics and finance 1998; working paper no 2
  2. Gümüş FM, Şerit K. Is there any relationship between making motor insurance with persons' demographics features and otherwise with persons' anxiety level?. AIBU Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2015; 15 (1): 111-141
  3. Dragos SL. Life and non-life insurance demand: the different effects of influence factors in emerging countries from Europe and Asia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 2014; 27 (1): 169-180
  4. Gümüş FM, Şerit K. Is there any relationship between making fire insurance with persons' demographics features and otherwise with persons' anxiety level?. Journal of Business Research Turk, 2014; 6 (4): 191-210
  5. Filiz Z, Şengöz M. Kasko sigortası tercihinin konjoint analizi ile incelenmesi. "İş Güç" Industrial relations and human redources journal 2010; 12 (1): 107-121
  6. Bitler MP, Schmidt L. Utilization of infertility treatments: the effects of insurance mandates Demography 2012; 49 (1): 125-149
  7. Garven JR. The demand for insurance, 2006
  8. Nyman JA. The demand for insurance: expected utility theory from a gain perspective. University of Minnesota 2001; 1-31
  9. Cleeton DL, Zellner BB. Income, risk aversion, and the demand for insurance. Southern Economic Journal 1993; 60 (1): 146-156
  10. Bowers NL, Gerber HU, Hickman JC, Jones DA, Nesbitt CJ. Actuarial mathematics, 1997
  11. Gerber HU, Pafum, G. Utility functions: from risk theory to finance, North American Actuarial 1998; 2 (3): 74-91
  12. Dickson DCM. Insurance risk and ruin. Cambridge University Press, 2005
  13. Erdemir C, Kadılar C. Benzetim tekniklerine giriş. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2003
  14. Kroese DP, Taimre T, Botev ZI. Handbook of monte carlo methods. John Wiley & Sons, 2013
  15. Banks J, Carson J, Nelson B, Nicol D. Discrete-event system simulation. Prentice Hall, 2001
  16. Tse YK. Nonlife actuarial models: theory, methods and evaluation. Cambridge University Press, 2009
  17. Achieng OM. No I. Actuarial modelling for insurance claim severity in motor comprehensive policy using industrial statistical distributions. International Congress of Actuaries; 2010; Cape Town: pp. 7- 12
  18. Kaarik M, Umbleja M. Estimation of claim size distributions in Estonian traffic insurance. Proceedings of the international conference on applied computing conference. World Scientific and Engi