Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

SYNTHESIS OF GRAPHENE VIA CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION ON COPPER SUBSTRATES WITH DIFFERENT THICKNESSES

Pages
289–300
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the grain size calculated from XRD data is decreasing as the thickness increases except for 25 μm thick copper.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The quality of the graphene grown on the top and subside of copper substrate with different thicknesses was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Graphenes were grown on the 9, 25, 150 and 250 μm thickness copper substrates with Low-Pressure CVD by using CH4 process gas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the grain size calculated from XRD data is decreasing as the thickness increases except for 25 μm thick copper.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The quality of the graphene grown on the top and subside of copper substrate with different thicknesses was investigated. Graphenes were grown on the 9, 25, 150 and 250 μm thickness copper substrates with Low-Pressure CVD by using CH4 process gas. Copper substrates were examined through XRD/XRF analysis. Graphenes that are grown on the surface of the copper substrate were characterized by Raman spectrometer. The results show that the grain size calculated from XRD data is decreasing as the thickness increases except for 25 μm thick copper. Besides the micro-strain in the structure is increasing according to the thickness of substrate. Raman spectroscopy results show that the graphene grown on the top surface of the 9 μm thick substrate is purely single-layer. The other samples consist of not only single-layer graphene but also few-layer graphene domains. When we look at I2D/IG ratios for samples on the top surface of coppers, the graphene doping decreases together with increasing thickness of substrate. At the same time, graphenes on the copper subsurface have blueshift and higher FWMH values. It reveals there is a close relation between the graphene and the copper subsurface. The graphene grown on the top side of the 150 μm copper has the typical attribute of suspended single-layer graphene with the redshift of a narrow 2D peak and I2D/IG ≈ 4. In this study, the best sample is obtained on the top surface of the 150 μm thick copper substrate. The large single-layer graphene is depend on microstrain rather than grain orientation

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M., EKER, Y. R. (2022). SYNTHESIS OF GRAPHENE VIA CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION ON COPPER SUBSTRATES WITH DIFFERENT THICKNESSES. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 289–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/438273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007;6:183-191
  2. Slonczewski JC, Weiss PR. Band structure of graphite. Phys. Rev. 1958;109:272-279
  3. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;306:666-669
  4. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, et al. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008;8:902-907
  5. Fowler JD, Allen MJ, Tung VC, Yang Y, Kaner, RB, Weller BH. Practical chemical sensors from chemically derived graphene. ACS Nano. 2009;3(2):301-306 [6] Wang X, Zhi L, Mullen K. Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett. 2008;8(1):323-327. [7]Wang F, Zhang Y, Tian C, Girit C, Zettl A, Crommie M, et al. Gate-variable optical transitions in graphene. Science. 2008;320(5873):206–209
  6. Mueller T, Xia F, Avouris, P. Graphene photodedectors for high-speed optical communications. Nat. Photon. 2010;4:297-301
  7. Schwierz F. Graphene transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5:487-496
  8. Xia F, Perebeinos V, Lin YM, Wu Y, Avouris P. The origins and limits of metal-graphene junction. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011;5:179-184
  9. Xia F, Farmer DB, Lin YM, Avouris, P. Graphene field-effect transistors with high on/off current ratio and large transport band gap at room temperature. Nano Lett. 2010;10:715-718
  10. Brownson DAC, Banks CE. Fabricating supercapacitors: highlighting the impact of and moieties. Chem. Commun. 2012.;48:1425-1427
  11. Wang G, Shen X, Yao J, Park J. Graphene nanosheets for enhanced lithium storage in lithium ion batteries. Carbon. 2009;47(8):2049-2053
  12. Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:3906-3924
  13. Losurdo M, Giangregorio MM, Capezzuto P, Bruno G. Graphene CVD growth on copper and nickel: role of hydrogen in kinetics and structure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011;13:20836-20843
  14. Dikin DA, Stankovich S, Zimney EJ, Piner RD, Dommett GHB, Evmenenko G, et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature. 2007;448:457-460
  15. Bonaccorso F, Lombardo A, Hasan T, Sun Z, Colombo L, Ferrari AC. Production and processing of graphene and 2d crystals. Materialstoday. 2012;15(12):564-589
  16. Wang C, Chen W, Han C, Wang G, Tang B, Tang C, et al. Growth of millimeter-size single crystal graphene on Cu foil