Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

THE IMPACT OF TEXT REPRESENTATION AND PREPROCESSING ON AUTHOR IDENTIFICATION

Pages
218–224
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, it is shown that stop-words should be kept inside the text while stemming can be preferred depending on the classification algorithm so that higher performance can be achieved for author identification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Author identification, one of the popular topics in text classification and natural language processing, basically aims to determine the author of a given text through various analyses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the contributions of all possible combinations of different text representation approaches, namely unigram and bigram, together with the preprocessing tasks, including stemming and stop-word removal, to the performance of author identification are investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it is shown that stop-words should be kept inside the text while stemming can be preferred depending on the classification algorithm so that higher performance can be achieved for author identification.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Author identification, one of the popular topics in text classification and natural language processing, basically aims to determine the author of a given text through various analyses. In the literature, different text representation approaches and use of preprocessing steps are considered for author identification problem. This paper aims to comprehensively examine the impact of text representation and preprocessing steps on author identification specifically for Turkish language. For this purpose, the contributions of all possible combinations of different text representation approaches, namely unigram and bigram, together with the preprocessing tasks, including stemming and stop-word removal, to the performance of author identification are investigated. For the experimental evaluation, a brand new dataset is constituted. Also, two different classification algorithms, namely Multinomial Naive Bayes and Sequential Minimal Optimization, are employed. The results of the experimental analysis reveal that using bigram features alone should be avoided. Besides, it is shown that stop-words should be kept inside the text while stemming can be preferred depending on the classification algorithm so that higher performance can be achieved for author identification.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAL, S., PAK, M. Y. (2022). THE IMPACT OF TEXT REPRESENTATION AND PREPROCESSING ON AUTHOR IDENTIFICATION. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 218–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/438265

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aslanturk O. Turkish authorship analysis with an incremental and adaptive model. MSc, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 2014
  2. Diri B, Amasyali MF. Automatic author detection for Turkish texts. In: ICANN/ICONIP 2003 The Joint International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and International Conference on Neural Information Processing; 26-29 June 2003; Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 138-141
  3. Amasyali MF, Diri B. Automatic Turkish text categorization in terms of author, genre and gender. In: NLDB 11th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems; 31 May- 2 June 2006; Klagenfurt, Austria. pp. 221-226
  4. Amasyali MF, Diri B, Turkoglu F. Farklı özellik vektörleri ile Türkçe dokümanların yazarlarının belirlenmesi. In: TAINN The 15th Turkish Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks; 21-24 June 2006; Mugla, Turkey
  5. Turkoglu F, Diri B, Amasyali MF. Author attribution of Turkish texts by feature mining. In: ICIC 2007 The 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Computing; 21-24 August 2007; Qingdao, China. pp. 1086-1093
  6. Kaban Z, Diri B. Genre and author detection in Turkish texts using artificial immune recognition systems. In: IEEE 2008 The 16th Signal Processing, Communication and Applications Conference; 20-22 April 2008; Aydin, Turkey. pp. 1-4
  7. Orucu F. Turkish Language Characteristics and Author Identification. MSc, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey, 2009
  8. Bay Y, Celebi E. Feature Selection for Enhanced Author Identification of Turkish Text. In: ISCIS 2015 The 30th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences; 23-25 September 2015; London, UK. pp. 371-379
  9. Stamatatos E. A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009; 60: 538-556
  10. Joachims T. A probabilistic analysis of the Rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorization. In: ICML 1997 The 14th International Conference on Machine Learning; 8-12 July 1997; San Francisco, USA. pp. 143-151
  11. Gunal S. Hybrid feature selection for text classification. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2012; 20: 1296-1311
  12. Uysal AK, Gunal S, Ergin S, Sora Gunal E. The impact of feature extraction and selection on SMS spam filtering. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 2013; 19: 67-72
  13. Pak MY, Gunal S. Sentiment classification based on domain prediction, Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 2016; 22: 96-9