Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

THE FOURIER TRANSFORM BASED DESCRIPTOR FOR VISUAL OBJECT CLASSIFICATION

Pages
247–261
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental results show that our proposed descriptor yields good classification accuracies (the best results on Coil-100, and the second best result on Caltech-101 and PASCAL VOC 2007 datasets) indicating that FT based local descriptors obtain important properties of images that are valuable for visual object classification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Image representation models such as bag of words (BoW) or Fisher vector (FV), which are built depending on encoding local features, are commonly used in visual object classification tasks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we propose a new descriptor using weighted histograms of phase angles of local 2-D discrete Fourier transform (FT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental results show that our proposed descriptor yields good classification accuracies (the best results on Coil-100, and the second best result on Caltech-101 and PASCAL VOC 2007 datasets) indicating that FT based local descriptors obtain important properties of images that are valuable for visual object classification.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Image representation models such as bag of words (BoW) or Fisher vector (FV), which are built depending on encoding local features, are commonly used in visual object classification tasks. In this context, the local patches sampled from images are represented by different texture and shape descriptors such as Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Local Binary Pattern (LBP), Speed up Robust Features (SURF), etc. In this study, we propose a new descriptor using weighted histograms of phase angles of local 2-D discrete Fourier transform (FT). We make comparisons with the classification accuracies achieved by using the proposed descriptor to the ones achieved by other commonly used descriptors on Caltech-101, Coil100 and PASCAL VOC 2007 databases. Experimental results show that our proposed descriptor yields good classification accuracies (the best results on Coil-100, and the second best result on Caltech-101 and PASCAL VOC 2007 datasets) indicating that FT based local descriptors obtain important properties of images that are valuable for visual object classification. By combining image representations resulting from FT descriptor with the representations resulting from other descriptors, accuracies even get better demonstrating that tested descriptors encode different supplementary knowledge.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİKALP, H., KURT, Z. (2022). THE FOURIER TRANSFORM BASED DESCRIPTOR FOR VISUAL OBJECT CLASSIFICATION. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 247–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/438259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Csurka G, Dance CR, Fan L, Willamowski J, Bray C. Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In: 8th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV); 11-14 May 2004; Prague, Czech Republic: Springer. pp. 59-74
  2. Jurie F, Triggs B. Creating efficient codebooks for visual recognition. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2005); 17-20 October 2005; Beijing, China: IEEE. pp. 1103- 1110
  3. Sivic J, Russell BC, Efros AA, Zisserman A, Freeman WT. Discovering object categories in image collections. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 17-20 October 2005; Beijing, China: IEEE. pp.370-377
  4. Harzallah H, Jurie F, Schmid C. Combining efficient object localization and image classification. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 29Sept. -2 Oct. 2009; Kyoto, Japan: IEEE. pp.237-244
  5. Fergus R, Fei-Fei L, Perona P, Zisserman A. Learning object categories from Google's image search. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 17-20 October 2005; Beijing, China: IEEE. pp. 1816 - 1823
  6. Nister D, Stewenius H. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 17-22 June 2006; New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 2161-2168
  7. Leung T, Malik J. Representing and recognizing the visual appearance of materials using threedimensional textons. International Journal of Computer Vision 2001; 43: 29-44
  8. Nowak E, Jurie F, Triggs B. Sampling strategies for bag-of-features image classification. In: 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV); 7-13 May 2006; Graz, Austria: Springer. pp. 490- 503
  9. Barnard K, Duygulu P, Guru R, Gabbur P, Forsyth D. The effects of segmentation and feature choice in a translation model of object recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 16-22 June 2003; Madison, WI, USA: IEEE. pp. 675-682
  10. Koniusz P, Mikolajczyk K. On a quest for image descriptors based on unsupervised segmentation maps. In: IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR); 23-26 Aug. 2010; Istanbul, Turkey: IEEE. pp.762-765
  11. Moosman F, Nowak E, Jurie F. Randomized clustering forests for image classification. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 2008; 30: 1632-1646
  12. Bourreau YL, Bach F, LeCun Y, Ponce J. Learning mid-level features for recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 13-18 June 2010; San Francisco, CA