Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR GEOLOGICAL CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE AREA IN TURKEY

Pages
536–545
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, this method detects Diyarbakır as$CO2$ storage area which is also one of the most important city of Turkey for having finished oil reservoirs and for itsgeopolitical location.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In contemporary era, carbon sequestration has become an important issue.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Rapidly increasing population, higher lifestandardsand technological advancements consistently increase the amount of emissions, especially $CO2$.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, this method detects Diyarbakır as$CO2$ storage area which is also one of the most important city of Turkey for having finished oil reservoirs and for itsgeopolitical location.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In contemporary era, carbon sequestration has become an important issue. Rapidly increasing population, higher lifestandardsand technological advancements consistently increase the amount of emissions, especially $CO2$. Nowadays, themost promising solution is to minimize the carbon dioxide emissions with using carbon capture and storage (CCS)technologies for a better future. The problem is to choose the best location for $CO2$ storage which is a crucial and challengingmulticriteria decision problem. The objective of this paper is to determine the most appropriate city for carbon dioxidestorage in Turkey, by demonstrating a successful implementation of Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tool. Thisstudy presents the use of MCDM method based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)to assess the suitable location for $CO2$ storage. For that purpose, 4 alternative locations were evaluated via 8 criteria whichare determined according to the opinions of the experts with background information from the field. Towards this end,MCDM method, namely, TOPSIS, was utilized for the location evaluation. Consequently, this method detects Diyarbakır as$CO2$ storage area which is also one of the most important city of Turkey for having finished oil reservoirs and for itsgeopolitical location.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTİŞ, İ. F. (2022). APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR GEOLOGICAL CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE AREA IN TURKEY. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 536–545. https://ajindex.com/articles/438245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Emission database for global atmospheric research EDGAR http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2013/. [Online] European Commission
  2. Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC. Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009
  3. Dlugokencky E, Tans P. Earth System Research Laboratory.https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/ trends/global.html#global. [Online] 2017
  4. M, Carlowicz. Earth Observatory. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features /WorldOfChange /decadaltemp.php.[Online] NASA, 2014
  5. IEA. World Energy Outlook. 2004
  6. M, Blunt. Carbon dioxide storage: Grantham Institute Briefing paper, 2010. 4, 1-14
  7. Liao C. et al. Comparison of different methods for determining key parameters affecting CO2 storage capacity in oil reservoirs. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2014; 28: 25-34
  8. Kissinger A, Noack V, Knopf S, Scheer D, Konrad W, Class H. Characterization of reservoir conditions for CO2 storage using a dimensionless Gravitational Number applied to the North German Basin. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments2014; 7: 209–220
  9. Davison J. Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2. Energy 2007, 32; (7):1163–1176
  10. Grataloup S, Bonijoly D, Brosse E, Dreux R, Garcia D, Hasanov V, Lescanne M, Renoux P, Thoraval A. A site selection methodology for CO2 underground storagein deep saline aquifers: case of the Paris Basin. Energy Procedia 2009; 1 (1): 2929-2936
  11. Ramírez A, HAgedoorn S, Kramers L, Wildenborg T, Hendriks C. Screening CO2 storage options in The Netherlands. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010; 4: 367–380
  12. Llamas B, Cienfuegos P. Multicriteria decision methodology to select suitable areas for storing CO2. Energy & Environment 2012; 23 (2-3): 249-264
  13. Ertugrul I, Karakasoglu N. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods forfacility location selection. The Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2008; 39 (7-8): 783-795
  14. Kahraman C, Ruan D, Dogan I. Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences 2003; 157: 135-153
  15. Alpay, M. TOPSIS method in evaluation of credit rating and a research. MSc, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey, 2010
  16. Deveci M, Demirel NÇ, John R, Özcan E. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for carbon dioxide geological storage in Turkey. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 2015; 27 (2): 692-705
  17. Petrol İşler