Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW OF PM10 LEVELS IN İSTANBUL: ANNUAL AND SEASONAL SPATIO-TEMPORAL VARIATIONS AND THE LONG-DISTANCE TRANSPORT

Pages
219–234
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicatethat the number of exceedances allowed by the EU standards is violated daily and annually at all monitoring sites whichindicate serious air quality problem in İstanbul.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study provides a comprehensive overview of the particulate matter with diameters equal or smaller than 10 µm (PM10)levels in the megacity İstanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PM10 concentrations of ten ambient air quality monitoring stations in İstanbul were studiedfor the period of 2007-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicatethat the number of exceedances allowed by the EU standards is violated daily and annually at all monitoring sites whichindicate serious air quality problem in İstanbul.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive overview of the particulate matter with diameters equal or smaller than 10 µm (PM10)levels in the megacity İstanbul. PM10 concentrations of ten ambient air quality monitoring stations in İstanbul were studiedfor the period of 2007-2016. The study focuses on: (i) similarities and differences among PM10 monitoring areas, (ii) spatialand temporal variations of PM10, (iii) long-distance PM10 transport for four selected cases. PM10 concentrations showsignificant variations across the megacity, with high PM10 levels at heavy traffic points and industrial zones. Results indicatethat the number of exceedances allowed by the EU standards is violated daily and annually at all monitoring sites whichindicate serious air quality problem in İstanbul. Monthly mean PM10 analysis indicated the most polluted month beingNovember in eight stations, and December is the second most polluted month. The seasonal variation is characterized by highconcentrations in the winter, and low concentrations in the summer. Analyses of high PM10 episodic events shed light onpossible long-distance emission sources and key atmospheric flow patterns which transport PM10 from the Atlantic, Europe,the Balkans, the Black Sea, North Africa-the Saharan Desert and the Eastern Mediterranean.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRTAŞ, M. (2022). A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW OF PM10 LEVELS IN İSTANBUL: ANNUAL AND SEASONAL SPATIO-TEMPORAL VARIATIONS AND THE LONG-DISTANCE TRANSPORT. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 219–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/438238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. NCL - the NCAR Command Language (Version 6.3.0) [Software]. 2016.
  2. Boulder, Colorado: UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD. http://dx.doi.org/10.5065/D6WD3XH5 Rolph GD. Real-time Environmental Applications and Display System (READY) Website (http://www.ready.noaa.gov).
  3. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD., 2016
  4. Stein AF, Draxler RR, Rolph GD, Stunder BJB, Cohen MD, Ngan F. NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2016; 96: 2059-2077.
  5. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, H´olm EV, Isaksen L, Kallberg P, K¨ohler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette J-J, Park B-K, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Th´epaut J-N, Vitart F. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2011; 137: 553–597.
  6. EU Directive, EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. European Commission, 2008,
  7. Brussels, Belgium. Kindap T, Unal A, Chen S-H, Hub Y, Odman, MT, Karaca, M. Long-range aerosol transport from Europe to Istanbul, Turkey. Atmospheric Environment. 2006; 40 (19): 3536–3547.
  8. Karaca F, Anil I, Alagha O. Long range potential source contributions of episodic aerosol events to PM10 profile of a megacity. Atmos. Environ. 2009; 43: 5713-5722.
  9. Koçak M, Theodosi C, Zarmpas P, Im U, Bougiatioti A, Yenigun O, Mihalopoulos N. Particulate matter (PM10) in Istanbul: Origin, source areas and potential impact on surrounding regions. Atmos. Environ. 2011; 45: 6891-6900.
  10. Im U, Markakis K, Unal A, Kindap T, Poupkou A, Incecik S, Yenigun O, Melas D, Theodosi C, Mihalopoulos N. Study of a winter PM episode in Istanbul using the high resolution WRF/CMAQ modeling system. Atmospheric Environment. 2010; 44: 3085-3094.
  11. Im U, Tayanç M, Yenigun O. Analysis of major photochemical pollutantswithmeteorological factors for high ozone days in Istanbul, Turkey. Water Air Soil Pollution, 2006; 175: 335–59.
  12. Unal YS, Toros H, Deniz A, Incecik S. Influence of meteorological factors and emission sources on spatial and temporal variations of PM10 concentrations in Istanbul metropolitan area. Atmos. Environ. 2011; 45: 5504-5513.
  13. Kanakidou M, Mihalopoulos N, Kindap T, Im U, Vrekoussis M, Gerasopoulos E, Dermitza