SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Nepotism perception and job satisfaction in healthcare workers

Sağlık çalışanlarında nepotizm algısı ve iş doyumu

Mustafa YAVUZ
Nermin GÜRHAN
Bahadır GENİŞ
Pages
468–476
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study revealed a significant negative correlation between the all subdimensions of the Nepotism Scale and the pay, promotions, supervision and co-workers’ subdimensions of the Job Satisfaction Scale (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Studies on the perception of nepotism in public institutions and organizations in Turkey is rather limited.In the health sector, there are almost no studies on nepotism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample consists of 316 people.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study revealed a significant negative correlation between the all subdimensions of the Nepotism Scale and the pay, promotions, supervision and co-workers’ subdimensions of the Job Satisfaction Scale (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Studies on the perception of nepotism in public institutions and organizations in Turkey is rather limited.In the health sector, there are almost no studies on nepotism. This study will therefore make a great contribution inrespect of investigating the perceptions of healthcare professionals towards nepotism. Methods: In this study, theperception of nepotism in the health sector in Turkey has sought to investigate. Data collection form, Nepotism andJob Satisfaction Scales were used in this study, and data were collected using the quantitative data collectiontechnique. The study sample consists of 316 people. Results: While 91.8% of the participants said that they werenot favored by anybody to secure a job/promotion etc., 77.8% said they knew at least one person who receivedpreferential treatment in job search. The study revealed a significant negative correlation between the all subdimensions of the Nepotism Scale and the pay, promotions, supervision and co-workers’ subdimensions of the Job Satisfaction Scale (p

Özet

Amaç: Türkiye'de kamu kurum ve kuruluşlarında nepotizm algısı üzerine çalışma sayısı azdır. Sağlık sektöründe, nepotizm konusunda neredeyse hiçbir çalışma yoktur. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma sağlık profesyonellerinin nepotizme karşı algılarının araştırılmasına katkı sağlayacaktır. Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de sağlık sektöründe nepotizm algısı araştırılmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırmada Veri Toplama Formu, Nepotizm ve İş Doyumu Ölçekleri kullanılmış; veri, nicel veri toplama tekniği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Çalışma örneklemi 316 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Sonuçlar: Katılımcıların %91.8'i iş/terfi vb. için herhangi biri tarafından kayrılmadığını söylerken, %77.8'i iş aramada öncelikli muamele gören en az bir kişiyi tanıdığını söylemiştir. Çalışma, Nepotizm Ölçeğinin tüm alt boyutları ile iş doyumu ölçeğinin ücret, terfi, denetim ve iş arkadaşları alt boyutları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVUZ, M., GÜRHAN, N., GENİŞ, B. (2022). Nepotism perception and job satisfaction in healthcare workers. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 468–476. https://ajindex.com/articles/437850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Büte M. The effects of nepotism and favoritism on employee behaviors and human research management practices: a research on Turkish public banks. TODAĐE’s Review of Public Administration 2011; 5:185-208
  2. Özkanan A, Erdem R. Favoritism Applications In Management: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences 2014; 2:179-206
  3. Gyimah-Boadi E. Conflict of interest, nepotism and cronyism. J Pope (Ed.), TI Source Book 2000: Confronting Corruption. The Elements of a National Integrity System, London: Transparency International, 2000, pp.195-204
  4. Ford R, McLaughlin F. “Nepotism: Boon or Bane”. Personnel Administrator 1986; 31:78-89
  5. Ponzo M, Scoppa V. The use of informal networks in Italy: Efficiency or favoritism? The Journal of Socio-Economics 2010; 39:89-99
  6. Abdalla Hagen F. Assessing the perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism: A cross‐cultural study. International Journal of Manpower 1998; 19:554-570
  7. Khatri N, Tsang EW. Antecedents and consequences of cronyism in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 2003; 43:289-303
  8. Özler H, Gümüştekin GE. Aile işletmelerinde nepotizmin gelişim evreleri ve kurumsallaşma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2007; 1:437-450
  9. Rowshan AG, Ghasemnezhad M, Hemmat Z. Investigation of Nepotism in Public Sector Organizations in Iran and its Impact on Employee’s Performance. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics 2015; 2:189- 199
  10. Gavor MP, Stinchfield BT. Towards a theory of corruption, nepotism, and new venture creation in developing countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 2013; 18:1-14 11. Ghebregiorgis F, Karsten L. Employee reactions to human resource management and performance in a developing country: Evidence from Eritrea. Personnel Review. 2007; 36:722-738
  11. OECD. Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017
  12. Dugani S, Afari H, Hirschhorn LR, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with burnout among frontline primary health care providers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Gates Open Res 2018; 2:4
  13. Keles H, Özkan T, Bezirci M. A study on the effects of nepotism, favoritism and cronyism on organizational trust in the auditing process in family businesses in Turkey. International Business and Economics Research Journal 2011; 10:9-16
  14. Mutlu K. Problems of nepotism and favouritism in the police org