SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

A Normative Assessment of Possible Effects of Prenatal Testing and Diagnostic Procedures on Pregnant Women, the Disabled, and the Society

Prenatal Tarama ve Teşhis Prosedürlerinin Gebe Kadınlar, Engelliler ve Toplum Üzerindeki Olası Etkilerine Dair Normatif Bir Değerlendirme

İlhan İLKILIÇ
Maide BARIŞ
Pages
111–120
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study presents a normative analysis on the possible effects of prenatal testing on women, the disabled, and the society, subsequently followed by an inquiry as to whose interests or rights provide the justificatory basis for such intervention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Prenatal testing and diagnostic procedures are a variety of intervention that aim to provide and do provide in utero information about the health of the fetus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These procedures are supported and argued for on grounds that they are beneficent occasionally for the pregnant woman or the society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study presents a normative analysis on the possible effects of prenatal testing on women, the disabled, and the society, subsequently followed by an inquiry as to whose interests or rights provide the justificatory basis for such intervention.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Prenatal testing and diagnostic procedures are a variety of intervention that aim to provide and do provide in utero information about the health of the fetus. These procedures are supported and argued for on grounds that they are beneficent occasionally for the pregnant woman or the society. This study presents a normative analysis on the possible effects of prenatal testing on women, the disabled, and the society, subsequently followed by an inquiry as to whose interests or rights provide the justificatory basis for such intervention.

Özet

Prenatal tarama ve teşhis prosedürleri fetüsün sağlığı ile ilgili in utero bilgi edinmeyi amaçlayanve sağlayan uygulamalardır. Bu prosedürler kimi zaman gebe kadın, kimi zaman datoplum için yararlı oldukları argümanıyla savunulmakta ve desteklenmektedir. Bu çalışmadaprenatal testlerin kadınlar, engelliler ve toplum üzerindeki olası etkilerine dair normatifbir analiz sunulacak, ardından bunların kimin yararına ya da kimin hakkı olarak uygulandığısorusuna cevap aranacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLKILIÇ, İ., BARIŞ, M. (2022). A Normative Assessment of Possible Effects of Prenatal Testing and Diagnostic Procedures on Pregnant Women, the Disabled, and the Society. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 111–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/437735

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Kıran H, Kıran G, Güven MA. Maternal yaşın gebelik seyri ve fetal prognoz üzerine etkileri. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Derg. 2003;12(2). Statham H, Solomou W, Chitty L. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(4):731–47. Bunim J. UCSF surgeon reflects on performing world’s first fetal surgery 30 years ago. USCF. 2011. www.ucsf.edu/ news/2011/02/9366/ucsf-surgeon-reflectsperformingworlds-first-fetal-surgery-30-years-ago. Tosun F, Bilgin A, Kizilok A, Arpaci A, Yüregir G. Five-year evaluation of premarital screening program for hemoglobinopathies in the province of Mersin, Turkey. Turk J Hematol. 2006;23(2):84–9. Platon. Devlet, 15. ed. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları; 2008 Aksoy S. Antenatal screening and its possible meaning from unborn baby’s perspective. BMC Med Ethics. 2001;2(1):1. Heyd D. Prenatal diagnosis: whose right? J Med Ethics. 1995;21(5):292–7. Dixon DP. Informed consent or institutionalized eugenics? How the medical profession encourages abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome. Issues Law Med. 2008;24(1):3–59. Reindal SM. Disability, gene therapy and eugenics: a challenge to John Harris. J Med Ethics. 2000;26(2):89– 94. David HP, Fleischhacker J, Hohn C. Abortion and eugenics in Nazi Germany. Popul Dev Rev. 1988;14(1):81– 112. Çaha H. Elemeci kürtaj: öjenizmin yeni yüzü. İş Ahlakı Derg. 2014;7(2):53. Wasserman D, Asch A. The uncertain rationale for prenatal disability screening. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):53– 6. Bişgin A. Hemoglobinopatilerde moleküler genetik tanı ve genetik danışmanlık. Zirve Tıp Derg. 2016;1(2):54–8.
  2. Savulescu J. Resources, Down’s syndrome, and cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2001;322(7291):875. Binkert F, Mutter M, Schinzel A. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the prevalence of live births with Down syndrome in the eastern half of Switzerland 1980–1996. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002;132(33/34):478–84.
  3. Harris RA, Washington AE, Nease RF, Kuppermann M. Cost utility of prenatal diagnosis and the risk-based threshold. Lancet. 2004;363(9405):276–82. Asch A. Why I haven’t changed my mind about prenatal diagnosis: reflections and refinements. Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, ed. Parens E, Asch A. Washington, DC/ABD: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
  4. Wasserman D, Asch A. Selecting for disability: acceptable lives, acceptable reasons. AJOB. 2012;12(8):30–1.
  5. Duster T, Beeson D. Pathways and Barriers to Genetic Testing and Screenin