SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

A Retrospective Review of Patients Hospitalized in the Postoperative Intensive Care Unit due to Ectopic Pregnancy Rupture

Ektopik Gebelik Rüptürü Nedeniyle Postoperatif Yoğun Bakım Ünitesine Alınan Hastalar Üzerine Bir Retrospektif İnceleme

Osman Uzundere
Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar
Pages
44–50
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that between the ICU length of stay and the hematocrit and platelet values, hemoglobin values, ES and FFP use, and PS use there was a weak negative (r=-0.388, p=0.003; r=-0.380, p=0.004), moderate negative (r=-0.436, p=0.001), moderate positive (r=0.469, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, we aimed to retrospectively review the clinical characteristics of patients who were operated on for ectopic pregnancy rupture (EPG) in our hospital and hospitalized in the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) and evaluate the possible relations between the patient laboratory data and ICU length of stay.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study included 56 female patients whose medical records were available and who were hospitalized in the ICU between 1.1.2017 and 1.1.2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that between the ICU length of stay and the hematocrit and platelet values, hemoglobin values, ES and FFP use, and PS use there was a weak negative (r=-0.388, p=0.003; r=-0.380, p=0.004), moderate negative (r=-0.436, p=0.001), moderate positive (r=0.469, p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to retrospectively review the clinical characteristics of patients who were operated on for ectopic pregnancy rupture (EPG) in our hospital and hospitalized in the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) and evaluate the possible relations between the patient laboratory data and ICU length of stay. Materials and Methods: The study included 56 female patients whose medical records were available and who were hospitalized in the ICU between 1.1.2017 and 1.1.2019. We retrospectively recorded the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory data, amount of blood and blood products received, and number of days spent in the ICU. Results: The mean patient age was 30.21±5.26 years and the mean ICU length of stay was 1.87±1.20 days. The patients were given an average of 1.78±1.76 units of erythrocyte suspension (EU), 1.19±1.55 U fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and 0.03±0.26 U platelet suspension (PS). It was found that between the ICU length of stay and the hematocrit and platelet values, hemoglobin values, ES and FFP use, and PS use there was a weak negative (r=-0.388, p=0.003; r=-0.380, p=0.004), moderate negative (r=-0.436, p=0.001), moderate positive (r=0.469, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, hastanemizde ektopik gebelik rüptürü (EGR) nedeniyle acilen opere edilen vesonrasında postoperatif yoğun bakım ünitesine (YBÜ) alınan hastaların klinik özelliklerini incelemek velaboratuvar verileri ile YBÜ’de kalış süresi arasındaki olası ilişkileri retrospektif olarak değerlendirmekamaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya dosya verilerine ulaşılabilen ve 1.1.2017—1.1.2019 döneminde YBÜ’de yatmış olan 56 kadın hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, laboratuvar verileri, aldıklarıkan ve kan ürünü miktarları ile YBÜ’de kaldıkları gün sayısı retrospektif olarak kaydedildi.Bulgular: Ortalama hasta yaşı 30,21±5,26 yıl, ortalama YBÜ’de kalış süresi 1,87±1,20 gün idi. Hastalaraortalama 1,78±1,76 ünite eritrosit süspansiyonu (ES), 1,19±1,55 Ü taze donmuş plazma (TDP) ve 0,03±0,26Ü trombosit süspansiyonu (TS) verildi. Hastaların YBÜ’de kalış süresi ile hematokrit ve platelet değerleri, hemoglobin değeri, ES ve TDP kullanımı, ve TS kullanımı arasında sırasıyla negatif yönlü zayıf (r=-0,388, p=0,003; r=-0,380, p=0,004), negatif yönlü orta (r=-0,436, p=0,001), pozitif yönlü orta (r=0,469,p

🔖

Cite This Article

Uzundere, O., Kaçar, C. K. (2022). A Retrospective Review of Patients Hospitalized in the Postoperative Intensive Care Unit due to Ectopic Pregnancy Rupture. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 44–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/437634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, ve ark. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014;2(6):323–33
  2. Zhang B, Cui L, Tang R, Ding L, Yan L, Chen ZJ. Reduced ectopic pregnancy rate on day 5 embryo transfer compared with day 3: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):1–14
  3. Kontomanolis EN, Kalagasidou S, Fasoulakis Z. MicroRNAs as potential serum biomarkers for early detection of ectopic pregnancy. Cureus. 2018;10(3):e2344
  4. Lawani OL, Anozie OB, Ezeonu PO. Ectopic pregnancy: a life-threatening gynecological emergency. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:515–21
  5. Taran F, Kagan K, Hübner M, Hoopmann M, Wallwiener D, Brucker S. The diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:693–704
  6. Stremick J, Couperus K, Ashworth S. Ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy at fifteen weeks gestational age. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019;3(1):62–4
  7. O’Neill SM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Greene RA, Henriksen TB, Lutomski JE, ve ark. Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(6):671–80
  8. Della-Giustina D, Deny M. Ectopic pregnancy. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003;21:565–84
  9. Panelli DM, Phillips CH, Brady PC. Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review. Fertil Res Pract. 2015;1(1):1–20
  10. Neth M, Thompson M, Gibson C, Gullett J, Pigott D. Ruptured ectopic pregnancy in the presence of an intrauterine device. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019;3(1):51–4
  11. Baker M, dela Cruz J. Ectopic pregnancy, ultrasound. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2019. Erişim: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482192 (erişildi: 23.12.2019)
  12. Rathore R, Shilpi S, Chopra R, Nargotra N. Primary splenic pregnancy - A rare but imperative cause of hemoperitoneum - Case report and review of literature. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2017;1(1):1–5
  13. Yang M, Cidan L, Zhang D. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–4
  14. Beyazit F, Pek E, Çakır Güngör A, Gencer M, Uysal A, Hacıvelioğlu S, ve ark. Retrospective analysis of factors affecting the clinical course and treatment outcome of ectopic pregnancy. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Derg. 2017;14(1):9–12
  15. Lozeau A. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(9):1707–14
  16. Krishna H, Chava M, Jasmine