SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Relationships between guilt and forgiveness in university students

Üniversite öğrencilerinde suçluluk ve affetme arasındaki ilişkiler

Cem MALAKCIOĞLU
Pages
209–214
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was seen that the feeling of guilt predicted forgiveness and all sub-dimensions of forgiveness at a statistically significant level (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Guilt is defined as a self-conscious emotion generated from negative attributions of own behaviors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research data was collected from 604 university students from Turkey in 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was seen that the feeling of guilt predicted forgiveness and all sub-dimensions of forgiveness at a statistically significant level (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Guilt is defined as a self-conscious emotion generated from negative attributions of own behaviors. It is observed that people with guilt are less forgiving. There are different types of forgiveness. Guilt is expected to have a stronger effect on self-forgiveness than forgiving others and situations. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between guilt and different types of forgiveness in a group of university students. Methods: This research is in the correlational survey model. Research data was collected from 604 university students from Turkey in 2018. After confirming that the assumptions were adequately met, the relationships were examined through Pearson correlations and path (linear regression) analyses. Results: All variables were significantly correlated at the 0.01 statistical significance level. It was seen that the feeling of guilt predicted forgiveness and all sub-dimensions of forgiveness at a statistically significant level (p

Özet

Amaç: Suçluluk, kişilerin kendi davranışlarına olumsuz atıflarından kaynaklanan bir öz-bilinç duygu- su olarak tanımlanır. Suçluluk duygusuna sahip kişilerin daha az affedici oldukları gözlenmektedir. Affetmenin farklı türleri vardır. Suçluluğun kendini affetme durumu üzerinde, başkalarını ve du- rumları affetme durumundan daha güçlü bir etkiye sahip olması beklenmektedir. Bu çalışmada bir grup üniversite öğrencisinde suçluluk duygusu ve affetme türleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Araştırma ilişkisel tarama modelindedir. Araştırma verileri 2018 yılında Türkiye’de öğre- nim gören 604 üniversite öğrencisinden toplanmıştır. Analiz varsayımlarının sağlandığı doğrulan- dıktan sonra, suçluluk ile affetme türleri arasındaki ilişkiler, Pearson korelasyonları ve yol (doğrusal regresyon) analizleri aracılığıyla incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Tüm araştırma değişkenleri arasında .01 düzeyinde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı ilişkiler bu- lunmuştur. Yol analizleri sonucunda suçluluk duygusunun affetmeyi ve affetmenin tüm alt boyut- larını istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı düzeyde (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MALAKCIOĞLU, C. (2022). Relationships between guilt and forgiveness in university students. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 209–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/437611

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Barrett LF, Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, editors. Handbook of emotions. 4th ed. New York, NY: Guilford Publications; 2016.
  2. Tangney JP, Wagner P, Fletcher C, Gramzow R. Shamed into anger: The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;62(4):669-75.
  3. Park JH, Enright RD, Essex MJ, Zahn-Waxler C, Klatt JS. Forgiveness intervention for female South Korean adolescent aggressive victims. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2013;34(6):268-76.
  4. Tangney JP, Miller RS, Flicker L, Barlow DH. Are shame, guilt, and embarassment distinct emotions? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:1256-69.
  5. Tangney JP, Niedenthal PM, Covert MV, Barlow DH. Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins's (1987) hypotheses. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(1):256-68.
  6. Harvey OJ, Gore EJ, Frank H, Batres AR. Relationship of shame and guilt to gender and parenting practices. Pers Individ Differ. 1997;23(1):135-46. McCullough ME. Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2000;19(1):43-55.
  7. Lawler-Row KA, Piferi RL. The forgiving personality: Describing a life well lived? Pers Individ Differ. 2006;4:1009-20.
  8. Akbağ M, Erden İmamoğlu S. Cinsiyet ve bağlanma stillerinin utanç, suçluluk ve yalnızlık duygularını yordama gücünün araştırılması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilim. 2010;10(2): 651-82. Deniz ME. Ergenlerde bağlanma stilleri ile çocukluk istismarları ve suçluluk-utanç ilişkisi. Eurasian J Educ Res. 2016;22:89-99.
  9. Maltby J, Macaskill A, Day L. Failure to forgive self and others: A replication and extension of the relationship between forgiveness, personality, social desirability and general health. Pers Individ Differ. 2001;30:881-5.
  10. Walker DF, Gorsuch RL. Forgiveness within the big five personality model. Pers Individ Differ. 2002;32:1127-37. Strelan P. Who forgive other, themselves, and situations? The roles of narcissism, guilt, self-esteem, and agreeableness. Pers Individ Differ. 2007;42:259-69.
  11. Starcevic V, Berle D. Cognitive specificity of anxiety disorders: A review of selected key constructs. Depress Anxiety. 2006;23:51-61.
  12. Bugay A, Demir A. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of trait shame and guilt scale. Eurasian J Educ Res. 2011;45:17-30.
  13. Bugay A, Demir A, Delevi R. Assessment of reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Heartland forgiveness scale. Psychol Rep. 2012;111(2):575-84.
  14. Maltby J, Macaskill A, Day L. Forgiveness and defense style. J Genet Psychol