Journals / Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

The role of the laboratory in the diagnosis of newborn sepsis through the eyes of a microbiologist

Mikrobiyolog gözüyle yenidoğan sepsisinin tanısında laboratuvarın rolü

Pages
227–242
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the definition and classification of neonatal sepsis, causative bacterial pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, biomarkers used in diagnostic methods, and current information are shared.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sepsis remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the newborn population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accu- rate identification and screening of sepsis are essential for clinical management, healthcare design, and future research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the definition and classification of neonatal sepsis, causative bacterial pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, biomarkers used in diagnostic methods, and current information are shared.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sepsis remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the newborn population. Un- fortunately, current definitions of sepsis in pediatrics do not address sepsis in the premature population. Many neonatal research publications have criteria for the definition of sepsis, but they vary widely, and there is typically a heavy emphasis on microbiological culture. Accu- rate identification and screening of sepsis are essential for clinical management, healthcare design, and future research. In this review, the definition and classification of neonatal sepsis, causative bacterial pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, biomarkers used in diagnostic methods, and current information are shared.

Özet

Sepsis, yenidoğan popülasyonunda önde gelen morbidite ve mortalite nedeni olmaya devam etmektedir. Pediatride mevcut sepsis tanımları, prematüre popülasyondaki sepsisi ele almamaktadır. Birçok yenidoğan araştırma yayınlarında sepsis tanımı için kriterler vardır, ancak bunlar büyük ölçüde farklılık gösterir ve tipik olarak mikrobiyolojik kültüre yoğun bir vurgu bulunmaktadır. Sepsisin doğru tanımlanması ve taranması, klinik yönetim, sağlık hizmeti tasarımı ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için önemlidir. Bu derlemede neonatal sepsisin tanımı, sınıflaması, etken bakteriyel patojenleri, antimikrobiyal direnci, epidemiyolojisi, tanı yöntemlerinde kullanılan biyobelirteçler ve güncel bilgiler paylaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKMAN, N., SAĞIROĞLU, P. (2022). The role of the laboratory in the diagnosis of newborn sepsis through the eyes of a microbiologist. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 227–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/437609

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Satar M, Arısoy AE, Çelik İH. Turkish Neonatal Society guideline on neonatal infections-diagnosis and treatment. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2018;53(Suppl 1): S88. Wynn JL. Defining neonatal sepsis. Curr. Opin. in Pediatr. 2016;28(2):135. Seale AC, Blencowe H, Manu AA, Nair H, Bahl R, QaziSA, et al. Esti mates of possible severe bacterial infection in neonates in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and LatinAmerica for 2012: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(8):731-41. Gerdes JS. Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the neonate. Pediatr Clin. 2004;51(4):939-59. Haque KN. Definitions of bloodstream infection in the newborn. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(3):45-9.
  2. Rossi P, Botgross R. Report on the expert meeting on neonatal and pediatric sepsis in the Pediatric committee of the European Medicines Agency. EMA London. 2010. EMA/477725. Benitz WE. Adjunct laboratory tests in the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37(2):421-38.
  3. Chirico G, Loda C. Laboratory aid to the diagnosis and therapy of infection in the neonate. Pediatr. Res. 2011;3(1):1-5.
  4. Belushkin A, Yesilkoy F, González López JJ, Ruiz Rodríguez JC, Ferrer R, Fàbrega A, et al. Rapid and digital detection of inflammatory biomarkers enabled by a novel portable nanoplasmonic imager. Small. 2020;16(3):1906108. Klinger G, Levy I, Sirota L, Boyko V, Reichman B, Lerner-Geva L, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for early onset sepsis among very-low-birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):38-e1. Phares CR, Lynfield R, Farley MM, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, et al. Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999-2005. JAMA. 2008;299(17):2056-65.
  5. Boyer KM, Gadzala CA, Kelly PD, Burd LI, Gooff SP. Selective intrapartum chemoprophylaxis of neonatal group B streptococcal early-onset disease. II. Predictive value of prenatal cultures. J Infect Dis.1983;148(5):802-9
  6. Schrag S, Gorwitz R, Fultz-Butts K, Schuchat A. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-11):1–22.
  7. Badri MS, Zawaneh S, Cruz AC, Mantilla G, Baer H, Spellacy WN, et al. Rectal colonization with group B streptococcus: relation to vaginal colonization of pregnant women. J Infect Dis. 1977;135(2):308-12.
  8. Paolucci M, Landini MP, Sambri V. How can the microbiologist help in diagnosing neonatal sepsis? Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:120139. Wilkinson HW. CAMP-disk test for presu