SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Adapting Historical Perspective Taking Instrument into Turkish and Investigating History and Social Studies Student Teachers’ Historical Perspective Taking Skills

Tarihsel Bakış Açısı Edinme Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması ve Tarih ve Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının Tarihsel Bakış Açısı Edinme Becerilerinin İncelenmesi

Erkan DİNÇ
Servet ÜZTEMUR
Pages
441–481
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research findings reveal that the Turkish version of the HPT instrument is valid and reliable which has a coherent and compatible structure with its original version.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to adapt historical perspective taking (HPT) instrument into Turkish and then to examine history and social studies student teachers’ HPT skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adapting a cross-sectional survey model the current study employs 386 history and social studies student teacher attending to related educational programmes at Gazi, Necmettin Erbakan and Uşak universities in the spring term of 2017-2018 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research findings reveal that the Turkish version of the HPT instrument is valid and reliable which has a coherent and compatible structure with its original version.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to adapt historical perspective taking (HPT) instrument into Turkish and then to examine history and social studies student teachers’ HPT skills. Adapting a cross-sectional survey model the current study employs 386 history and social studies student teacher attending to related educational programmes at Gazi, Necmettin Erbakan and Uşak universities in the spring term of 2017-2018 academic year. The study sample was chosen in accordance with random sampling technique. In order to test the structural validity of the HPT Instrument confimatory factor analyses were conducted. Besides, descriptive statistics, t-tests, Brown-Forsythe ve Welch Statistics and One-way Anova were conducted. The research findings reveal that the Turkish version of the HPT instrument is valid and reliable which has a coherent and compatible structure with its original version. The findings also indicate that although there are some differences amongst the groups in regard with several variables, students teachers have sufficient HPT skills. Bearing on this result, the current study discusses the place and importance of measuring HPT skills within the Turkish context.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı tarihsel bakış açısı edinme ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlayarak tarih vesosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının tarihsel bakış açısı edinme becerilerini incelemektir. Kesitseltarama modeline göre desenlenen araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2017-2018 öğretim yılında Gazi,Necmettin Erbakan ve Uşak üniversitelerinin çeşitli pogramlarında öğrenim gören ve tesadüfiörnekleme yöntemiyle seçilmiş 386 tarih ve sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır.Tarihsel bakış açısı edinme ölçeğinin Türkçe sürümünün yapı geçerliliği belirlemek içindoğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistikler, t-testi, BrownForsytheve Welch istatistikleri ve tek yönlü varyans analizinden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırmabulguları tarihsel bakış açısı edinme ölçeğinin Türkçe sürümünün orijinal ölçeğin yapısıylauyumlu bir şekilde geçerli ve güvenilir bir yapıda olduğunu göstermiştir. Yapılan incelemelerayrıca bazı değişkenler açısından gruplar arasında çeşitli farklılıklar olsa da tarih ve sosyal bilgileröğretmen adaylarının tarihsel bakış açısı edinme becerlerinin yeterli düzeyde olduğunugöstermiştir. Çalışmanın son kısmında bu sonuçlardan hareketle tarihsel bakış açısı edinmebecerilerinin ölçülmesinin Türkiye bağlamındaki yer ve önemi tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇ, E., ÜZTEMUR, S. (2022). Adapting Historical Perspective Taking Instrument into Turkish and Investigating History and Social Studies Student Teachers’ Historical Perspective Taking Skills. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 441–481. https://ajindex.com/articles/435947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Achinstein, B., & Fogo, B. (2015). Mentoring novices’ teaching of historical reasoning: Opportunities for pedagogical content knowledge development through mentorfacilitated practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.002. Ashby, R., & Lee, P. (1987). Children's concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62−88). London: The Falmer Press.
  2. Bain, R., & Mirel, J. (2006). Setting up camp at the great instructional divide educating beginning history teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 212–219. doi:10.1177/0022487105285892. Barton, K. C. (2012). Agency, choice and historical action: How history teaching can help students think about democratic decision making. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 7, 131–142. doi:10.1386/ctl.7.2.131_1. Barton, K. C. (2008). Research on students’ ideas about history. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 239–258).
  3. New York, NY: Routledge. Barton, K. C. (1996). Narrative simplifications in elementary students' historical thinking. Advances in Research on Teaching, 6, 51−83. Barton, K., & Levstik, L. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah: Erlbaum. Bermúdez, A., & Jaramillo, R. (2001). Development of historical explanation in children, adolescents and adults. In A. Dickinson, P. Gordon, & P. Lee (Eds.), Raising standards in history education, vol. 3. (pp. 146−167). London: Woburn Press.
  4. Berti, A. E., Baldin, I., & Toneatti, L. (2009). Empathy in history. Understanding a past institution (ordeal) in children and young adults when description and rationale are provided. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(4), 278–288.
  5. Beyer, B. K. (2008). How to teach thinking skills in social studies and history. The Social Studies, 99, 196–201. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.5.196-201.
  6. Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77, 25–31. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00096-2.
  7. Breakstone, J. (2014). Try, try, try again: The process of designing new history assessments. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 453–485. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.965860. Brooks, S. (2011). Historical empathy as perspective recognition and care in one secondary social studies classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39, 166–202. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473452 Brophy, J., & VanSledright, B. (1997). Teaching and learnin