SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

EFL Instructors’ Majors and Their Speaking Activity Choices for Informal Oral Assessment

Ahmet Selçuk AKDEMİR
Berk İLHAN
Pages
1–26
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the light of the findings, practical and theoretical implications are given with concluding remarks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to investigate frequently used speaking tasks in English classes at tertiary level in Turkey and differences in language instructors’ speaking activity choices for informal oral assessment with regard to their academic majors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As data collection tool, an electronic questionnaire was sent to 82 participant language instructors from different universities in Turkey in the academic year 2016-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the light of the findings, practical and theoretical implications are given with concluding remarks.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate frequently used speaking tasks in English classes at tertiary level in Turkey and differences in language instructors’ speaking activity choices for informal oral assessment with regard to their academic majors. As data collection tool, an electronic questionnaire was sent to 82 participant language instructors from different universities in Turkey in the academic year 2016-2017. The questionnaire included speaking activities that can be used with assessment purpose and the participants were asked to report the frequency of the activities they used. The data which was collected through the electronic questionnaire was analysed by using SPSS 22 software. Kruskal-Wallis test revealed statistically significant differences between participants’ academic majors and speaking activities they used for informal oral assessment. Seven oral assessment activities were found to differ in frequency according to academic majors; picture-cued tasks, giving instructions/directions, role-play, discussions/conversations, games, picture-cued storytelling, and retelling story/news event. The differences were compared by mean ranks and medians, and these differences were classified according to the creativity the task required. In the light of the findings, practical and theoretical implications are given with concluding remarks.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, A. S., İLHAN, B. (2022). EFL Instructors’ Majors and Their Speaking Activity Choices for Informal Oral Assessment. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 1–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/435921

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Cheng, L., Rogers, T. & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/ EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21 (3) 360–389. doi: 10.1191/0265532204lt288oa Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. USA: MIT Press.
  3. Chuang, Y. Y. (2009). An investigation of how teachers evaluate collage non-English major students’ oral proficiency and their attitude toward teaching speaking skills. Journal of Cheng Shiu University, Vol.22, 335-356.
  4. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Gulluoglu, O. (2004). Attıtudes towards Testıng Speakıng at Gazi Unıversıty Preparatory School of Englısh and Suggested Speakıng Tests. (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara Höl, D. (2010). Perceptıons and attıtudes of the Englısh Language ınstructors and preparatory students towards testıng speakıng communıcatıvely ın the School of foreıgn languages at Pamukkale University. (Unpublished master thesis). Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. Hosseini, A.S. & Azarnoosh, M. (2014). Iranian EFL instructor’s oral Assessment practices: purposes, methods, procedures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 98 (2014). 653 – 658. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.464 Kalayci, S. (2016). Spss uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara:
  5. Asil Yayıncılık. Kellermeier, G. M. (2010). Foreign Language Oral Assessment Practices in Florida Middle and High Schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, U.S.A. Louma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  6. McDonough, J. & McDonough, H.S. (1997). Research Methods for English Language Teachers. London: Arnold Publishing. McDonough, J. (1993). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher's Guide. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell. Morrow, K. E. (1977). Techniques of Evaluation for a Notional Syllabus. London: University of Reading Centre for Applied Language Studies. Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Oz, H. (2014). Turkish teachers’ practices of a