SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

An Examination of Academic Procrastination Behavior In Pre-service Teachers

Dilek YALIZ SOLMAZ
Gonca EREN
Pages
666–682
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, no significant difference was determinedbetween the levels of academic procrastination of the pre-service teachers according to gender,year of study, the department selected for study, parental level of education or the perceptions ofacademic success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is important to identify academic procrastination behaviours disrupting the educationallife of students, it is also important to determine the academic procrastination tendencies andunderlying causes in teachers and pre-service teachers, who are an inseparable part of theeducation environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this research was to examine several variables of academicprocrastination behaviour in a group of 113 pre-service teachers studying in the PhysicalEducation and Sports Teaching Department of Anadolu University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, no significant difference was determinedbetween the levels of academic procrastination of the pre-service teachers according to gender,year of study, the department selected for study, parental level of education or the perceptions ofacademic success.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is important to identify academic procrastination behaviours disrupting the educationallife of students, it is also important to determine the academic procrastination tendencies andunderlying causes in teachers and pre-service teachers, who are an inseparable part of theeducation environment. The aim of this research was to examine several variables of academicprocrastination behaviour in a group of 113 pre-service teachers studying in the PhysicalEducation and Sports Teaching Department of Anadolu University. The Academic ProcrastinationInventory developed by Aitken (1982) and adapted to Turkish by Balkis (2006) was used in thestudy. In the analyses of the data, arithmetic means, standard deviation, t-test and ANOVAanalysis were used. According to the results obtained, no significant difference was determinedbetween the levels of academic procrastination of the pre-service teachers according to gender,year of study, the department selected for study, parental level of education or the perceptions ofacademic success. When the times that the pre-service teachers preferred to study lessons wereexamined, a significant difference was determined, with those preferring to work in the eveningshowing a lesser tendency for academic procrastination.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLMAZ, D. Y., EREN, G. (2022). An Examination of Academic Procrastination Behavior In Pre-service Teachers. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 666–682. https://ajindex.com/articles/435918

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Pittsburgh. Balkıs, M (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının davranışlarındaki erteleme eğilimlerinin düşünme ve karar verme tarzları ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, D.E.U.B.E.F, İzmir.
  2. Balkıs, M., Duru, E., Buluş, M. ve Duru, S. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinde akademikerteleme eğiliminin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 59-75
  3. Beswick, G., Rothblum, E. D., & Mann, L. (1988). Psychological antecedents of student procrastination. Australian Psychologist, 23(2), 207-217.
  4. Çetin, Ş. (2009). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin akademik erteleme davranışlarına ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25: 1-7.
  5. Dewitte, S., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (2002). Procrastination, temptations, and incentives: The struggle between the present and the future in procrastinators and the punctual. European Journal of Personality, 16(6), 469-489.
  6. Di Paula, A., & Campbell, J. (2002). Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 711–724.
  7. Effert, B., R. ve Ferrari, J. R. (1989). Decisional procrastination: Examining personality correlates. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 4, 151-156
  8. Ellis, A. ve Knaus, W. J. (1977). Overcoming procrastination. New York: Signet Books. Ferrari, J. R. (1991). Self-handicapping by procrastinators: Protecting self-esteem, socialesteem, or both?. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 245-261.
  9. Ferrari, J. R., O'Callaghan, J., & Newbegin, I. (2005). Prevalence of procrastination in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia: arousal and avoidance delays among adults. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(1). Fritzsche, B. A., Young, B. R., & Hickson, K. C. (2003). Individual differences in academic procrastination tendency and writing success. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(7), 1549-1557.
  10. Grecco, P. R. (1984). A cognitive-behavioral assessment of problematic academic procrastination: development of a procrastination self- statement inventory. (Unpublished PHD), California School of Professional Psychology - Fresno. Hammer, C. A., & Ferrari, J. R. (2002). Differential incidence of procrastination between blue and white-collar workers. Current Psychology, 21(4), 333-338. Haycock,