Journals / Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Turkish validity and reliability of the braden q scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk in children

Çocuk hastalarda braden q basınç ülseri değerlendirme ölçeği’nin Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenirliği

Pages
6–14
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the scores of the nurses and expert was not statistically significant for 7 subparameters and the scale (p>0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This research was conducted methodologically to adapt to Turkish and determine the validity and reliability of the Braden Q Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk in Pediatric Patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The research was conducted between 01.03.2012-01.07.2012 with 148 pediatric patients in a training and research hospital in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the scores of the nurses and expert was not statistically significant for 7 subparameters and the scale (p>0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This research was conducted methodologically to adapt to Turkish and determine the validity and reliability of the Braden Q Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk in Pediatric Patients. Method: The research was conducted between 01.03.2012-01.07.2012 with 148 pediatric patients in a training and research hospital in Turkey. Data were collected by three forms; Braden Q Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk in Pediatric Patients, form about patient’s features and form about nurse’s features. The patients were evaluated by his/her nurse and researcher simultaneously. Results: Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.80, and its subdimensions were between 0.72 and 0.82. Invariance between observers of the Braden Q Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk in Pediatric Patients was tested by test-retest reliability. It was found that the scores of the nurses and expert was not statistically significant for 7 subparameters and the scale (p>0.05). According to Roc analyse of the scale, the sensivity of all subparameters were high (AUC:0.95, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırma, pediatrik yaş grubunda basınç ülseri risk değerlendirmesinde kullanılan Çocuk Hastalarda Braden Q Basınç Ülseri Risk Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliğini çalışmak üzere metodolojik olarak yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Araştırma, 01.03.2012–01.07.2012 tarihleri arasında Sağlık Bakanlığı’na bağlı bir eğitim- araştırma hastanesinde yatan, basınç ülseri riski bulunan 148 çocuk hasta ile yapılmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında; hasta özelliklerine ve hemşirelerin bireysel özelliklerine ilişkin soru formu ve Çocuk Hastalarda Braden Q Basınç Ülseri Değerlendirme Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Aynı vaka eş-zamanlı olarak bakım veren hemşiresi ve araştırmacı tarafından değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Ölçeğin iç tutarlılığın değerlendirilmesinde Alfa değeri 0.80, alt maddelerin ise 0.72-0.82 arasında bulunmuştur. Gözlemciler arası uyum test-tekrar test ile bakılmış ve ölçeği oluşturan 7 maddede ve ölçek toplam puanında hemşireler ve araştırmacı arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Ölçeğin ROC analizine göre tüm maddelerde sensivite yüksek bulunmuş (AUC:0.95, p

🔖

Cite This Article

BORA, N. G., KILIÇARSLAN, E. T. (2022). Turkish validity and reliability of the braden q scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk in children. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 6–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/435710

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Albayrak AS. Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım; 2006. p.112. Anthony D, Willock J, Baharestani M. Comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan Risk Assessment Scales in Paediatrics. Journal of Tissue Viability 2010;19(3):98-105. AteĢ C, Öztuna D, Genç Y. Sağlık Araştırmalarında Sınıf içi Korelasyon Katsayısının Kullanımı. Journal of Bistatistics 2009;1(2):59-64 Avcı O. Basınç Ülserleri. Tüzün Y. Serdaroğlu S. editörler. Pediatrik Dermatoloji. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp; 2005. p. 696-700. Ayello EA. Why is pressure risk assessment so important. Nursing 2001;31(11):74-80.
  2. Ayello E, Berlowitz D, Cuddigan J. Pressure Ulcers in America: Prevalence, Incidence, and Implications for the Future An Executive Summary of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Monograph, Advances in Skin and Wound Care. The Journal for Prevention and Healing 2001;14 (4): 208 -15. Baldwin K. Incidence and prevelence of Pressure Ulcers in Children. Advanced Skin Wound Care 2002;1(4):121-4.
  3. Ball JW, Bindler RC. Child Health Nursing: Partnering with Children and Families.1st ed. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River; 2006. p. 65-76.
  4. Barnes D, Payton RG, Clinical application of the Braden scale in the acute-care setting. Dermatology Nursing 1993;5(5): 386-8.
  5. Bergstrom N, Braden B. A Prospective Study of Pressure Sore Risk Among Institutionalized Elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1992;40(8):747-58.
  6. Braden B, Bergstrom N. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population. Research in Nursing and Health 1994; 17(6): 459-70.
  7. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Kemp M, Champagne E, Ruby N. Predicting PU risk, a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden scale. Nursing Research 1998;6(2):89-96.
  8. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Laguzza A, Holman V. The Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nursing Research 1987;36(4): 205-10.
  9. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and Validity Assessment. 5th ed. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.;1982.p.17-43. Child D. The essentials of factor analysis. 3rd ed. London; Continuum; 2006. p.50 Claudia A, Pellegrino D, Blanes L. Portuguese Translation and Validation of the Braden Q Scale for Predicting PU Risk in Pediatric. Patients. Revista Paulista de Pediatria 2011;29 (3):405-41.
  10. Curley MA, Quigley SM, Lin M. Pressure ulcers in pediatric intensive care: incidence and associated factors. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2003;4(3): 284-90. Davis LL. Instrument review: Gettin