Journals / ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Preliminary Study on Edible Insect Species Cybister limbatus (Fabricius 1775) and Its Heavy Element Contents

Yenilebilir Böcek Türü Cybister limbatus (Fabricius 1775) ve Ağır Element Seviyeleri Üzerine Bir Ön Çalışma

Pages
94–99
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But especially residues of Pb and As, which arethought as the potential hazardous elements, in this edible insect may pose health problem in the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of the study was to determine the concentration of heavy elements in edible insect pack andestimate the potential health risks of elements to humans via consumption of the insect pack.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aquatic edible insect Diving Beetlepack, Cybister limbatus (Fabricius 1775) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) was chosen for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But especially residues of Pb and As, which arethought as the potential hazardous elements, in this edible insect may pose health problem in the future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the concentration of heavy elements in edible insect pack andestimate the potential health risks of elements to humans via consumption of the insect pack. Aquatic edible insect Diving Beetlepack, Cybister limbatus (Fabricius 1775) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) was chosen for the study. Sixteen heavy elements (Ca, Ti, V,Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Br, Rb, Sr, Pb) were determined in the edible beetle. Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence(EDXRF) was used to determine the concentration of the elements. Among the sixteen studied elements Ca (0.98 ppm), Ti (0.49ppm) and V (0.38 ppm) had the highest concentration, whereas Rb (0.05 ppm), Sr (0.04 ppm), As (0.32 ppm), Br (0.06 ppm) andPb (0.06 ppm) had the lowest concentration. The results compared with US institute of medicine (IOM) panel on micronutrientguidelines, the levels of elements in this study were found safe for consumption. But especially residues of Pb and As, which arethought as the potential hazardous elements, in this edible insect may pose health problem in the future.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı yenilebilir böcek paketlerindeki ağır element miktarını değerlendirmek ve bu böcek paketinin tüketimi yoluyla insanlar için sağlık riskini değerlendirmektir. Çalışma için sucul yenilebilir böcek Cybister limbatus (Fabricius 1775) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) seçilmiştir. Bu türde on altı ağır element (Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Br, Rb, Sr, Pb) tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma için EDXRF (Enerji Dağılımlı X-Işını Floresans) spektrometresi kullanılmıştır. Çalışılan 16 element arasında Ca (0,98 ppm), Ti (0,49 ppm) ve V (0,38 ppm) en yüksek konsantrasyonda, Rb (0,05 ppm), Sr (0,04 ppm), As (0,32 ppm), Br (0,06 ppm) ve Pb (0,06 ppm) ise en düşük konsantrasyondadır. Sonuçlar Birleşmiş Millletler İlaç Enstitüsü mikrobesin esasları hakkındaki panel ile karşılaştırıldığında, bu çalışmadaki değerler tüketim için uygun görülmüştür. Fakat, özellikle potansiyel zararlı elementlerden olduğu düşünülen Pb ve As miktarı gelecekte sağlık problemleri oluşturabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜROL, A., İNCEKARA, Ü., AYDOĞAN, Z. (2022). Preliminary Study on Edible Insect Species Cybister limbatus (Fabricius 1775) and Its Heavy Element Contents. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 94–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/435640

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Trouiller, B., R. Reliene, A. Westbrook, P. Solaimani, and R. H. Schiestl. 2009. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce DNA damage and genetic instability in vivo in mice. Cancer Research 69 (22): 8784-8789.
  2. Tong, S., Y. E. von Schirnding, and T. Prapamontol. 2000. Environmental lead exposure: a public health problem of global dimensions. Special Theme-Environment and Health. WHO. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78 (9): 1068-1077. http://www.who.int/ bulletin/archives/78(9)1068.pdf. Raubenheimer, D., and J. M. Rothman. 2013. Entomophagy in humans and other primates. Annual Review of Entomology 58: 141-60.
  3. Ramos-Elorduy, J., J. M. P. Moreno, and V. H. M. Camacho. 2009. Edible aquatic Coleoptera of the world with an emphasis on Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicin 5 (11): 11. Doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-5-11. Patrick L. 2006.
  4. Lead Toxicity, A Review of the Literature. Part I: Exposure, Evaluation, and Treatment. Alternative Medicine Review 11 (1): 2-22.
  5. Nilson, A. N., and M. Holmen. 1995. The Aquatic Adephaga (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. II. Dytiscidae (Brill EJ edt). Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, 32:192. Mitsuhashi, J. 2016. Edible insects of the world. CRC Press,Japan. Marger, L., C. R. Schubert, and D. Bertrand. 2014. Zinc: an underappreciated modulatory factor of brain function.Biochemical pharmacology 91 (4): 426-435.
  6. Mazumder, D. G. 2008. Chronic arsenic toxicity & human health. Indian Journal of Medical Research 128 (4): 436. Gall, J. E., R. S. Boyd, and N. Rajakaruna. 2015. Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: A review. Environ Monit Assess. 187: 201. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10661-015-4436-3.
  7. Fairweather-Tait, S. J., Y. Bao, M. R. Broadley, R. Collings,D. Ford, J. E. Hesketh, and R. Hurst. 2011. Selenium in human health and disease. Antioxidants & redox signaling 14 (7): 1337-1383.
  8. Dixit, R., D. Malaviya, K. Pandiyan, U. B. Singh, A. Sahu, R. Shukla, and D. Paul. 2015. Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: an overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability 7 (2): 2189-2212. Doi: 10.3390/su7022189. Deepa, J. 2009. Checklist of aquatic Coleoptera of India.Zoological Survey of India. 16p. Bodenheimer, F. S. 1951. Insect as human food. W Junk Pub.The hague, p 352. Anonymous. 2009. Bromide in drinking-water: background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/10665/70169/1/WHO_HSE_