Journals / ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Water-Yield Relations of Drip Irrigated Maize in Arid andSemi-Arid Regions

Kurak ve Yarı Kurak Bölgelerde Damla Sulama ile Sulanan Mısır Bitkisinin Su-Verim İlişkileri

Pages
9–20
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While I100 was recommended as the ideal irrigation program, I80 treatments could also be used to improve water use efficiencies in places where full irrigation is not possible.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine water-yield relations of drip-irrigated maize that was grown in Central Anatolia Region of Turkey with a dominant arid and semi-arid climate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Four different irrigation treatments were applied to experimental plots in 7-day intervals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While I100 was recommended as the ideal irrigation program, I80 treatments could also be used to improve water use efficiencies in places where full irrigation is not possible.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine water-yield relations of drip-irrigated maize that was grown in Central Anatolia Region of Turkey with a dominant arid and semi-arid climate. Four different irrigation treatments were applied to experimental plots in 7-day intervals. Irrigation treatments were laid out based on 7-day cumulative evaporation from class-A pan (I120 – 120%, I100 – 100%, I80 – 80% and I60 – 60% of pan evaporation). Applied irrigation water quantities varied between 431-676 mm in 2009 and between 453-726 mm in 2010. The greatest seasonal water consumption (821 mm) was observed in I120 treatment of 2010 and the lowest (590.1 mm) in I60 treatment of 2009. The greatest kernel yield per hectare (15773 kg $ha^{-1}$) was obtained from I120 treatment of 2010 and the lowest (8986 kg $ha^{-1}$) from I60 treatment of 2009. Water use efficiency (WUE) values varied between 1.45-1.99 kg $m^{-3}$ and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) values varied between 1.84-2.39 kg $m^{-3}$. Yield-response factor (ky) of maize was calculated as 1.47 in 2009 and 1.36, in 2010. While I100 was recommended as the ideal irrigation program, I80 treatments could also be used to improve water use efficiencies in places where full irrigation is not possible.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Türkiye’nin kurak ve yarı kurak iklim özelliği gösteren İç Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yer alan Konya ilindedamla sulama yöntemi ile sulanan mısır bitkisinin su-verim ilişkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada, parsellere 7 gün sulama aralığında dört farklı sulama miktarı uygulanmıştır. Sulama suyu miktarları, A sınıfı buharlaşma kabından oluşan yığışımlı buharlaşma değerinin; % 120’si (I120), % 100’ü (I100), % 80’i (I80) ve % 60’ı (I60) alınarak oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmada konulara 2009 yılında 431-676 mm, 2010 yılında ise 453-726 mm arasında değişen miktarlarda su uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, mısır bitkisinin mevsimlik su tüketimi en yüksek 821 mm ile 2010 yılında I120 konusunda, en düşük 590.1 mm ile 2009 yılında I60 konusunda gerçekleşmiştir. Birim alan tane verimi, en yüksek 15773 kg $ha^{-1}$ ile 2010 yılında I120 konusunda; en düşük ise 8986 kg $ha^{-1}$ ile 2009 yılında I60 konusundan elde edilmiştir. Su kullanım randımanı (WUE) ve sulama suyu kullanım randımanı (IWUE) konulara bağlı olarak, sırasıyla 1.45-1.99 kg $m^{-3}$ ve 1.84-2.39 kg $m^{-3}$ arasında değişmiştir. Mısır verim tepki etmeni (ky) 2009-2010 yıllarında sırası ile 1.47 ve 1.36 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda I100 konusu ideal sulama programı olarak önerilirken, tam sulamanın mümkün olmadığı koşullarda mevcut su potansiyeline bağlı olarak I80 konusu da benzer ekolojik bölgelerde su kullanım verimliliğini artırmak için önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, S., ŞAHİN, M. (2022). Water-Yield Relations of Drip Irrigated Maize in Arid andSemi-Arid Regions. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 9–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/435618

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abd El-Wahed, M. H., and E. A. Ali. 2013. Effect of irrigation systems, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield, water use efficiency and net profit. Agricultural Water Management 120: 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.017 Anonymous. 2017. Turkish Grain Board Report. http://www. tmo.gov.tr/Upload/Document/hububat/HububatRaporu2017.pdf (accessed May 2019). Anonymous. 2018. Turkey Statistical Institute. https://biruni. tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr (accessed April 2019). Anonymous. 2019. SPSS 16.0. Statistical software of IBM. Bozkurt, S., A. Yazar, and G. S. Mansuroglu. 2011. Effects of different drip irrigation levels on yield and some agronomic characteristics of raised bed planted corn. African Journal of Agriculture Research 6 (23): 5291-5300. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.232.
  2. Çakır, R. 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research 89: 1-16. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.fcr.2004.01.005. Dağdelen, N., E. Yılmaz, F. Sezgin, and T. Gurbuz. 2006. Water-yield relation and water use efficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and second crop corn (Zea mays L.) in western Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 82: 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agwat.2005.05.006. Doğan, E., and H. Kırnak. 2010. Water temperature and system pressure effect on drip lateral properties. Irrigation Science 28: 407-419. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00271-009-0202-z. Doorenbos, J., and A. H. Kassam. 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation Drainage. Paper no. 33. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. Djaman K., S. Irmak, W. R. Rathje, D. L. Martin, and D. E. Eisenhauer. 2013. Maize evapotranspiration, yield production function, biomass, grain yield, harvest index, and yield response factors under full and limited irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE 56 (2): 273-293. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42676.
  3. Emeklier, H. Y. 2018. Tarla Bitkileri (Sıcak İklim Tahılları). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları Ders K. No: 594 s.199-270, Ankara. Farré, I., and J. M. Faci. 2009. Deficit Irrigation in maize for reducing agricultural water use in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management 96: 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.07.002.
  4. Howell, T. A., A. Yazar, A. D. Schneider, D. A. Dusek, and K. S. Copeland. 1995. Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Corn in Response to LEPA Irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE 38 (6):