SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

TÜRKİYE BİLİŞİM VADİSİNİN BİLGİSAYARLI ARGÜMAN DELFI YÖNTEMİ İLE ÖNGÖRÜLMESİ

FORESIGHTING FOR INFORMATION VALLEY IN TURKEY VIA COMPUTERIZED ARGUMENT DELPHI TECHNIQUE

Sadi Evren ŞEKER
Ercan SALMAN
Gönül SEKENDUR
Enes EMEN
Pages
113–120
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper covers the details of the methodology, demography of the contributors, outcomes and the meaning of outcomes from the job clustering perspective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is an actual foresight analysis of Information Valley in Turkey and its social analysis through scientific methodologies and interpretation of its outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Computerized Argument Delphi method has been utilized in order to collect the information from social networks with crowd sourcing approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper covers the details of the methodology, demography of the contributors, outcomes and the meaning of outcomes from the job clustering perspective.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is an actual foresight analysis of Information Valley in Turkey and its social analysis through scientific methodologies and interpretation of its outcomes. Computerized Argument Delphi method has been utilized in order to collect the information from social networks with crowd sourcing approach. The method also supplies the dialectic discussion on the arguments of the contributors. Also the outcomes achieved from the computerized Argument Delphi has been aggregated and evaluation within the technique. This paper covers the details of the methodology, demography of the contributors, outcomes and the meaning of outcomes from the job clustering perspective.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, son yıllarda gündeme gelen Türkiyenin Bilişim Vadisi projesinin toplumsal öngörü analizini bilimsel yöntemlerle yaparak çıkan sonuçların yorumlanmasıdır. Konu hakkında kitle kaynak kullanılarak sosyal ağlar üzerinde konuya ilgi duyan kişilerin diyalektik tartışmalarına imkan veren bilgisayarlı argüman Delfi yöntemi kullanılmış ve elde edilen sonuçlar yine bu yöntemle birleştirilerek değerlendirilmiştir. Makale kapsamında, kullanılan metodun detayları, ulaşılan kişiler ve demografik yapısı, elde edilen bulgular ve bu bulguların iş kümeleri açısından anlamı açıklanacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKER, S. E., SALMAN, E., SEKENDUR, G., EMEN, E. (2022). TÜRKİYE BİLİŞİM VADİSİNİN BİLGİSAYARLI ARGÜMAN DELFI YÖNTEMİ İLE ÖNGÖRÜLMESİ. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 113–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/435144

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acemoglu, D. (1997). Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market. Review of Economic Studies, 64 (3), 445-464.
  2. Custer, R. L., Scarcella, J. A., & Stewart, B. R. (1999). The Modified Delphi Technique - A Rotational Modification. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 15 (2). Dwyer, T., Lee, B., Fisher, D., & Quinn, K. (2009). A Comparison of User-Generated and Automatic Graph Layouts. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15 (6), 961 - 968. Fallick, B., Fleischman, C. A., & Rebitzer, J. B. (2006). Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Microfoundations of a High-Technology Cluster. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (3), 472-481.
  3. Neuman, W. L. (2009). Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (7. Baskı). Pearson. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research. The Qualitative Report, 12 (2), 281-316.
  4. Peters, E., & Hood, N. (2000). Implementing the Cluster Approach: Some Lessons from the Scottish Experience. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30 (2), 68-92.
  5. Porter, M. E. (2000). Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (1), 15-20.
  6. Roberts, D. M., & Bilderback, E. W. (1980). Reliability and Validity of a Statistics Attitude Survey. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40 (1), 235-238.
  7. Roland Wiese, Markus Eiglsperger, & Michael Kaufmann. (2004). yFiles — Visualization and Automatic Layout of Graphs. Chapter Graph Drawing Software, Part of the series Mathematics and Visualization, 173 - 199. Roten, F. C., & Roten, Y. d. (2013). Statistics in science and in society: From a state-of-the-art to a new research agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 22 (7), 768-784.
  8. Seidman, I. (2005). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (Cilt 3). Teachers College Press;. Seker, S. E. (2014). Bilgi Yönetimi (Knowledge Management). YBS Ansiklopedi, 1, 8 - 14. Seker, S. E. (2015a). Computerized Argument Delphi Technique. IEEE Access, 3, 368-380.
  9. Seker, S. E. (2015b). Kitle Kaynak (Crowd Sourcing). YBS Ansiklopedi, 2, 6-11.
  10. Seker, S. E. (2015c). Metin Madenciliği (Text Mining). YBS Ansiklopedi, 2 (3), 30-32.
  11. Seker, S. E. (2015d). Motivasyon Teorisi (Motivation Theory). YBS Ansiklopedi, 2, 22 - 27. Seker, S. E. (2015e). Temporal logic extension for self refer