SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

UNSHARED AND SHARED FRAILTY MODELS

PAYLAŞILMAMIŞ VE PAYLAŞILMIŞ ZAYIFLIK MODELLERİ

Nihal ATA TUTKUN
Diren YEĞEN
Pages
45–56
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As for comparing the momentary risk between individuals with various levels of explanatory variables with other individuals, shared frailty models have been used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Cox regression model which is commonly used in survival analysis is established under the proportional hazards assumption.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However cases in which the data shows heterogeneity come across in studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As for comparing the momentary risk between individuals with various levels of explanatory variables with other individuals, shared frailty models have been used.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Cox regression model which is commonly used in survival analysis is established under the proportional hazards assumption. However cases in which the data shows heterogeneity come across in studies. In this case, heterogeneity should be explained in order to make the interpretations more effective which were obtained depending on the model. Frailty models are one of the survival analysis methods which were developed for explaining heterogeneity. In this study, frailty models are examined theoretically and were applied to the lung cancer data. The unshared frailty model has been used to explain the difference between general risk and momentary risk of individuals in the data set. As for comparing the momentary risk between individuals with various levels of explanatory variables with other individuals, shared frailty models have been used.

Özet

Yaşam çözümlemesinde sıklıkla kullanılan Cox regresyon modeli orantılı tehlikeler varsayımı altında kurulmaktadır. Ancak çalışmalarda verinin heterojen özellik gösterdiği durumlar ile karşılaşılmaktadır. Bu durumda modele bağlı olarak elde edilen yorumların daha etkin olabilmesi için heterojenliğin açıklanması gerekmektedir. Zayıflık modelleri heterojenliğin açıklanması için geliştirilmiş bir yaşam çözümlemesi yöntemidir. Bu çalışmada, zayıflık modelleri teorik açıdan incelenmiş ve akciğer kanseri verisi kullanılarak bir uygulama yapılmıştır. Veri kümesindeki bireylerin taşıdığı genel risk ile herhangi bir bireyin anlık riski arasındaki farklılığı açıklamada paylaşılmamış zayıflık modeli kullanılmıştır. Açıklayıcı değişkenlerin çeşitli düzeylerine sahip bireylerin veri kümesindeki diğer bireylere göre anlık riskinin karşılaştırılmasında ise paylaşılmış zayıflık modelleri kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTKUN, N. A., YEĞEN, D. (2022). UNSHARED AND SHARED FRAILTY MODELS. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 45–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/435126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ata, N. (2005). Yaşam Çözümlemesinde Orantısız Hazard Modeli, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2005.
  2. Babiker A., Cuzick J. (1994). A simple frailty model for family studies with covariates. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1679-1692.
  3. Clayton, D. (1978). A model for association in bivariate life tables and ıts applications in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease ıncidence. Biometrika, 65, 141-151.
  4. Clayton, D., Cuzick, J. (1995). Multivariate generalisations of the proportional hazards model (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 148, 82-117.
  5. Congdon, P. (1995). Modelling Frailty İn Area Mortality. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 1859-1874.
  6. Cox, D.R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,Series B, 34, 187-220.
  7. Duchateau, L., Janssen, P. (2007).
  8. The Frailty Model, Springer, New York. Economou, P., Caroni, C. (2005). Graphical tests for the assumption of gamma and inverse Gaussian frailty distributions. Lifetime Data Analysis 11, 565-582.
  9. Guo, G., Rodriguez, G. (1992). Estiamting amultivariate proportional hazards model for clustered data using the EM algorithm with an application to child survival in Guatemala. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 969-976.
  10. Gutierrez, R.G. (2002). Parametric frailty and shared frailty survival models. The Stata Journal, 2, 22-44.
  11. Hougaard, P.(1984). Life table methods for heterogeneous populations. Biometrika, 71, 75-83.
  12. Hougaard, P. (1986). Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions. Biometrika 73, 387-396.
  13. Hougaard, P.(1995). Frailty models for survival data. Lifetime Data Analysis, 1, 255-273.
  14. Hougaard, P. (2000). Analysis of Multivariate Survival Data, Springer, New York. Ibrahim, J. G., Chen, M., Sinha, D. (2001),
  15. Bayesian Survival Analysis, Springer, New York. Keiding, N., Andersen, P., Klein, J. (1997). The role of frailty models and accelerated failure time models in describing heterogeneity due to omitted covariates. Statistics in Medicine 16, 215-224.
  16. Kheiri, S., Kimber, A., Meshkani, M.R. (2007). Bayesian analysis of an inverse Gaussian correlated frailty model, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51, 5317-5326.
  17. Klein, J.P. (1992). Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm. Biometrics 48, 795- 806. Klein, J. P. and Moeschberger, M. L. (2003). Survival Analysis: Techniques f