Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Financial Development and Economic Growth in BRICS-T Countries: An Econometric Application

Pages
163–178
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the results obtained, all of the three models were found to have cointegration relationships, and it was concluded that the variables would act together in the long term.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the cointegration and causality relationships between economic growth and financial development were empirically analyzed using the annual data of BRICS-T countries for the period from 1991 to 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Access, depth, and effectiveness data, as well as the variables of Gross Fixed Capital Formation, labor force, and economic growth, representing the capital, are among the indicators representing IMF's financial development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the results obtained, all of the three models were found to have cointegration relationships, and it was concluded that the variables would act together in the long term.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the cointegration and causality relationships between economic growth and financial development were empirically analyzed using the annual data of BRICS-T countries for the period from 1991 to 2017. Access, depth, and effectiveness data, as well as the variables of Gross Fixed Capital Formation, labor force, and economic growth, representing the capital, are among the indicators representing IMF's financial development. In this empirical study, where three different models were used, the long-term relationship of capital, labor force, and one of the three indicators with economic growth was examined. In the results obtained, all of the three models were found to have cointegration relationships, and it was concluded that the variables would act together in the long term. In addition, causality relationships between access, depth and efficiency, and economic growth, which represent financial development, were also investigated in this empirical study. In the findings, it was found that economic growth was the causative of access; and that there was a two-way causality relationship between depth and economic growth, as well as between efficiency and economic growth. In light of these results, it was concluded that there was a two-way causality between financial development and economic growth.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLMAÇ, M., GÖVDELİ, T., ÖZKAN, T. (2022). Financial Development and Economic Growth in BRICS-T Countries: An Econometric Application. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 163–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/435095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aslan, Ö. & Korap, H. L. (2006). Türkiye’de Finansal Gelişme ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17, 1-20.
  2. Acaravci, A., Ozturk, I. & Acaravci, S. K. (2007). Finance – Growth Nexus: Evidence from Turkey. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1401590 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1401590.
  3. Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2004). A Panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127-1177.
  4. Bayar, Y. (2014). Financial development and economic growth in emerging Asian countries, Asian Social Science, 10(9), 8. Borlea, S. N., Mare, C., Achim, M. V. & Puscas, A. (2016). Direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Evidence for developing countries, Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldis” Arad–Economics Series, 26(2), 1-22.
  5. Bozoklu, Ş. & Yılancı, V. (2013). Finansal Gelişme ve İktisadi Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ekonomiler İçin Analiz. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 161-187.
  6. Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. Calderón, C. & Liu, L. (2003). The Direction of Causality Between Financial Development and Economic Growth, Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 321-334.
  7. Caporale, G. M., Rault, C., Sova, A. D. & Sova, R. (2015). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from 10 new European Union members, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 20(1), 48-60.
  8. Cojocaru, L., Falaris, E. M., Hoffman, S. D. & Miller, J. B. (2016). Financial System Development and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: New Empirical Evidence from The CEE and CIS Countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(1), 223-236.
  9. Demetriades, P. O., Rousseau, P. L. & Aewilak, J. (2017).
  10. Finance, Growth and Fragility. University of Leicester. Working Paper, No:17/13. Demez, S., Kızılkaya, O. & Dağ, M. (2019). Finansal Gelişme ve Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye için Bootstrap Nedensellik Analizi. Business & Economics Research Journal, 10(3). Dumitrescu, E. I. & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  11. Ekpeno, L.E. (2015). Financial development, institutions and economic growth: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development in Africa, United Kingdom: St. Catherine’s College, Oxford University. Erataş Sönmez, F.