SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Do Astrological Beliefs Reflects Systematic Bias in Personality Measurement?

Ahmet Mete ÇİLİNGİRTÜRK
Gözde BOZKURT
Pages
217–228
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The significant effects indicates either a direct reasoning or a systematic bias without questioning the belief of respondent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Personality is a complex concept specified by many factors and separated from character concept in many ways.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Astrology is an ancient study that involves classifications based upon the zodiac and regarded now as a pseudo-science.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The significant effects indicates either a direct reasoning or a systematic bias without questioning the belief of respondent.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Personality is a complex concept specified by many factors and separated from character concept in many ways. Astrology is an ancient study that involves classifications based upon the zodiac and regarded now as a pseudo-science. In this study, aim was to investigate the effect of the astrological personality on the personality characteristics, which were measured by the Five Factor Personality Model. The research studies finding that the pre-scientific beliefs had an effect on personality measuremets, motivates to accept the astrological groupings as a factor on explaining the personality and trait. The significant effects indicates either a direct reasoning or a systematic bias without questioning the belief of respondent.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİLİNGİRTÜRK, A. M., BOZKURT, G. (2022). Do Astrological Beliefs Reflects Systematic Bias in Personality Measurement?. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 217–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/435093

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Superstition, education and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1227-1236.
  2. Aharoni, E., Antonenko, O. & Kiehl, K.A. (2011). Disparities in the moral intuitions of criminal offenders: The role of prychpathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 322-327.
  3. Albayrak, A.S. (2006). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara: Asil Publishing, 499. Allum, N. (2010). What Makes Some People Think Astrology is Scientific?. Science Communication, 33(3), 341-366. Aşan Ö. & Aydin E. (2006).
  4. Örgütsel Davranış, Denizli: Arıkan Publishing, 77. Basim, H.J., Çetin F. & Tabak A. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20-34.
  5. Buck, S. (2018). Hiding in plain sight: Jung, astrology, and the psychology of the unconscious. The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 63(2), 207-227. Büyüköztürk Ş., (1997). İki Faktörlü Varyans Analizi. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal, 30(1), 141-158.
  6. Costa, P., McCrae, R.R. & Dye, D.A. (1991). Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A revision of The NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887- 898. Dıgman, J.M. & Inouye, J. (1986). Further Specification of The Five Robust Factors of Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 116-123.
  7. Doğan, T. (2013). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri ve Öznel İyi Oluş, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(1), 56- 64. Gaarder, J. (2013). Sofie’nin Dünyası (34th ed., trans. S. Yücesoy). Istanbul: Pan Publishing, 64. Güney, S. (2011). Davranış Bilimleri (6th ed.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing, 15-197.
  8. Hall, C. S. &, Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of Personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Hjelle, L.A. & Ziegler, D.J. (1992). Personality Theories (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 30. Jobson, J.D. (1992). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis (Vol. II). New York: Springer-Verlag Inc., 215. Jung, C. G. (1947). On the Nature of the Psyche. London: Ark Paperbacks. Jung, S.A. & Yang, C.S. (2015). Relations between Eastern Four Pillars Theory and Western Measures of Personality Traits. Yonsei Medical Journal, 56(3), 698-704.
  9. Lindeman, M. & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 731-744.
  10. Micceri, T. (1989). The Unicorn, the Normal Curve, and Other Improbable Creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 1