SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

An Integrated PIPRECIA and COPRAS Method under Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Truck Tractor Selection

Aşkın ÖZDAĞOĞLU
Murat Kemal KELEŞ
Volkan GENÇ
Gülin Zeynep ÖZTAŞ
Pages
269–298
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the findings of this study will pave the way for those who conduct academic studies and the authorities of companies involved in road transport in the logistics sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Selecting the right truck tractor is critical for logistics companies involved in road freight transportation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fact that having many conflicting criteria and many alternatives complicates the decision-making process for the decision-makers (DMs).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the findings of this study will pave the way for those who conduct academic studies and the authorities of companies involved in road transport in the logistics sector.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Selecting the right truck tractor is critical for logistics companies involved in road freight transportation. The fact that having many conflicting criteria and many alternatives complicates the decision-making process for the decision-makers (DMs). The determination of the criteria that are effective in the selection of truck tractors and then the evaluation of the alternatives are the main objectives of this study. In this context, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model composed of Fuzzy PIPRECIA (F-PIPRECIA) and Fuzzy COPRAS (F-COPRAS) methods is proposed to be used in the selection of truck tractors. In the related literature, no studies that applied F-PIPRECIA and F-COPRAS together to determine the best truck tractor have been published yet. In this regard, this study is thought to contribute to the literature both in terms of the methods used and the application of truck tractor selection. Moreover, the findings of this study will pave the way for those who conduct academic studies and the authorities of companies involved in road transport in the logistics sector.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDAĞOĞLU, A., KELEŞ, M. K., GENÇ, V., ÖZTAŞ, G. Z. (2022). An Integrated PIPRECIA and COPRAS Method under Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Truck Tractor Selection. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 269–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/435092

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alkan, Ö., & Albayrak, Ö. K. (2020). Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy-based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA. Renewable Energy, 162, 712- 726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.062
  2. Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Arzaghi, S., Stauskis, G., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2018). A hybrid fuzzy BWMCOPRAS method for analyzing key factors of sustainable architecture. Sustainability, 10(5), 1626. Ansari, Z. N., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2020). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate sustainable remanufacturing supply chain risks: a hybrid fuzzy SWARA-fuzzy COPRAS framework approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1758973
  3. Apak, S., Göğüş, G. G., & Karakadılar, İ. S. (2012). An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach with a Novel Framework for Luxury Car Selection. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1113
  4. Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87-96.
  5. Aytekin, A., and Durucasu,H. (2021). Nearest solution to references method for multicriteria decision-making problems. Decision Science Letters 10(2), 111-128.
  6. Başaran, B., & Çakir, S. (2021). Evaluation of food safety and halal criteria in supplier selection: an application in the food sector with fuzzy COPRAS method. International Food Research Journal, 28(3), 576-585. ISSN: 19854668 Baykaşoğlu, A. (2010). Çok kriterli TIR çekici seçimi. LODER Lojistik Dergisi, 14, 32-36.
  7. Baykasoğlu, A., & Golcuk, I. (2014). Çok kriterli tır çekici seçiminde bulanık integral yaklaşımı. 3. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, 15-17 Mayıs 2014, Trabzon, 776-786.
  8. Baykaşoğlu, A., Dereli, T., Altun, K., (2011). Kullanılmış tır çekici seşimi: pratik bir karar destek yaklaşımı EVEN-SWAP. Lojistik, 19, 18-22
  9. Baykaşoğlu, A., Kaplanoğlu, V., Durmuşoğlu, Z. D., & Şahin, C. (2013). Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(3), 899-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046 Blagojević, A., Kasalica, S., Stević, Ž., Tričković, G., & Pavelkić, V. (2021). Evaluation of safety degree at railway crossings in order to achieve sustainable traffic management: A novel integrated fuzzy MCDM model. Sustainability, 13(2), 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020832 Blagojević, A., Stević, Ž., Marinković, D., Kasalica, S., & Rajili