Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

İbn Arabi Düşüncesinde Bilgi, Tekerrür ve Güç: Metodoloji Hakkında Bazı Yorumlar

Knowledge, Repetition and Power in Ibn al- Arabi's Thought: Some Preliminary Comments on Methodology

Pages
39–50
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

His arguments can be utilized in critical and poststructuralist conceptions of power in IR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper s major motivation is to contribute to the debate on how international relations (IR) scholars can develop an alternative method for studying power.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A focus on Islamic Sufi thinker Ibn Al- Arabi is suggested to demonstrate the early philosophical conceptualization of power relations in a non-Western context.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:His arguments can be utilized in critical and poststructuralist conceptions of power in IR.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper s major motivation is to contribute to the debate on how international relations (IR) scholars can develop an alternative method for studying power. A focus on Islamic Sufi thinker Ibn Al- Arabi is suggested to demonstrate the early philosophical conceptualization of power relations in a non-Western context. For Ibn Al- Arabi, in a world in which unrepeatability is the rule, creating repeatability and fixation through interpretation is certainly done for worldly purposes. His work suggests that any attempt to understand the cosmosis an arbitrary intervention, which strictly reflects power relations among actors. Therefore, Ibn Al- Arabi s work can trigger scholarly questions on not only methodology but also on the sociology of the IR discipline and foreign policy in a non-Western context. His arguments can be utilized in critical and poststructuralist conceptions of power in IR.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın ana gerekçesi, uluslararası ilişkiler akademisyenlerinin güç çalışmaları üzerine nasıl alternatif bir yöntem geliştirebileceklerine ilişkin tartışmaya katkıda bulunmaktır. Batılı olmayan bağlamda yapılan erken güç ilişkileri kavramsallaştırılmalarına bir örnek olarak İslam mutasavvıfı İbn Arabi önerilmektedir. İbn Arabiye göre tekrar edilemezliğin kural olduğu bir dünyada, bir şeyi tefsir yoluyla tekrarlanabilir ve sabit kılmak dünyevi amaçlar için yapılmaktadır. Arabinin eseri, evren i anlamak için yapılan girişimlerin keyfi birer müdahale olduğunu ve bu müdahalelerin aktörler arasındaki güç ilişkilerini tam anlamıyla yansıttığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu nedenle, İbn Arabinin çalışması Batı-dışı bağlamda bir uluslararası ilişkiler ve dış politika disiplini için sosyolojik ve metodolojik bilimsel sorulara zemin hazırlamaktadır. Argümanları, uluslararası ilişkilerde eleştirel ve postyapısalcı güç kavramlarıyla değerlendirilebilir

🔖

Cite This Article

BALCI, A. (2022). İbn Arabi Düşüncesinde Bilgi, Tekerrür ve Güç: Metodoloji Hakkında Bazı Yorumlar. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 39–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/435031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Acharya, Amitav. “Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond The West.” Millenium: Journal of International Studies 39, no. 3 (2011): 619-37.
  2. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. “Why is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 287-312.
  3. Almond, Ian. Sufism and Deconstruction: A Comparative Study of Derrida and Ibn’Arabi. London: Routledge, 2004.
  4. Aydınlı, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia.” Review of International Studies 34, no. 4 (2008): 693-712.
  5. Behera, Navnita Chadha. “Re-imagining IR in India.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 341-68.
  6. Biltekin, Gonca. “Batı-dışı Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri ve Özgün Kuram.” In Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, edited by Ramazan Gözen, 517-64. İstanbul: İletişim, 2014.
  7. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian’ Pasts?” Representations 37 (1992): 1-26.
  8. Chittick, William C. The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-ʻArabi’s Metaphysics of Imagination. Albany: Suny Press, 1989.
  9. Crawford, Robert M.A. “Where Have All Theorists Gone- Gone to Britain? Everyone? A Story of Two Parochialisms in International Relations.” In International Relations—Still an American Social Science?: Toward Diversity, edited by Robert M.A. Crawford and Darryl S.L. Jarvis, 221-42. Albany: SUNY University Press, 2001.
  10. Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.
  11. Haj Yousef, Mohamed. Ibn ‘Arabi’: Time and Cosmology. New York: Routledge, 2008.
  12. Heidegger, Martin. “‘Only a God Can Save Us’: Der Spiegel Interview with Martin Hedegger (1966).” In The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, edited by Richard Wolin, 91-116. U.S.: MIT Press, 1993.
  13. Hoffmann, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, no. 3 (1977): 41-60.
  14. Holsti, Kal J. The Dividing Discipline. Winchester, Mass.: Allen & Unwin, 1985. Ibn al-ʻArabī. The Bezels of Wisdom. Translated by Ralph Austin. New Jersey: Paulist Press, 1980.
  15. Ibn Arabi, Muhyiddin. Contemplation of the Holy Mysteries. Translated by Cecilia Twinch and Pablo Beneito. Oxford: Anqa Publishing, 2008. Ibn Arabi. Fütuhat-ı Mekkiye. Translated by Ekrem Demirli. 18 vols. Istanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2006-2012.
  16. Norbu, Dawa. “Tibet in Sino-Indi