Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Violence and Security Concerns in Post-Conflict Northern Ireland

Pages
47–61
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The social vulnerabilities of working-class areas, such as continuing paramilitary presence, the legacy of sectarianism in segregated neighborhoods, persistent mistrust toward the police, and growing youth unemployment, need to be addressed in order to generate a long-term social infrastructure for peace.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Eighteen years after the Good Friday Agreement, Northern Ireland struggles with a lingering sense of insecurity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article discusses the underlying reasons for a sense of insecurity and vulnerability in this post-conflict context.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The social vulnerabilities of working-class areas, such as continuing paramilitary presence, the legacy of sectarianism in segregated neighborhoods, persistent mistrust toward the police, and growing youth unemployment, need to be addressed in order to generate a long-term social infrastructure for peace.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Eighteen years after the Good Friday Agreement, Northern Ireland struggles with a lingering sense of insecurity. This article discusses the underlying reasons for a sense of insecurity and vulnerability in this post-conflict context. First, ongoing sporadic communal violence reactivates communal divisions and the psychological burden of "the Troubles." The activities of spoiler paramilitary groups and sporadic communal troubles still fuel people's anxiety about the possibility of renewed violence, as the history of political violence proves how these influences can be a destabilizing factor in inter-communal relations. Second, the unchanging patterns of political mobilization, based on the historical division of unionism and nationalism, reinforce the previous cleavages and continue to inform the boundaries of the communal divide. The political arena is still plagued by ethnic outbidding and intransigent party politicking, both of which pit communities against each other and keep the zero-sum bias between the groups alive. Third, the working-class communities that constituted the backbone of the political violence carry on the legacy of war with their continued paramilitary presence and legacy of sectarianism. The social vulnerabilities of working-class areas, such as continuing paramilitary presence, the legacy of sectarianism in segregated neighborhoods, persistent mistrust toward the police, and growing youth unemployment, need to be addressed in order to generate a long-term social infrastructure for peace.

🔖

Cite This Article

BORSUK, İ. (2022). Violence and Security Concerns in Post-Conflict Northern Ireland. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 47–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/435024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. 2010 NILT Survey. Accessed August 13, 2014. http://www.ark.ac.uk/nilt/2010/Political_Attitudes/MLADECL1. html. 2013 NILT Survey. Accessed September 2, 2014. http://www.ark.ac.uk/nilt/2013/Political_Attitudes/POLPART2. html. Boal, Frederick W. "Encapsulation: Urban dimensions of national conflict." In Managing Divided Cities, edited by Seamus Dunn, 30-40. Keele: Keele University Press, 1994.
  2. Brewer, John D., Bill Lockhart, and Paula Rodgers. "Informal Social Control and Crime Management in Belfast." British Journal of Sociology 49, no. 4 (1998): 570-85.
  3. Brown, Kris, and Roger MacGinty. "Public Attitudes toward Partisan and Neutral Symbols in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland." Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 10, no. 1 (2003): 83-108.
  4. Bryan, Dominic. Orange Parades: The Politics of Ritual, Tradition, and Control. London: Pluto Press, 2000.
  5. Burton, John Wear. Conflict: Resolution and Prevention. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1990.
  6. Byrne, Jonny, Cathy Gormley-Heenan, and Gillian Robinson. Peace Walls: Public attitudes and impact on policy. University of Ulster &Institute for Research in Social Sciences, November 2012. Community Relations Council. Towards Sustainable Security: Interface Barriers and the Legacy of Segregation in Belfast. Belfast: Community Relations Council, c. 2009.
  7. DeRouen, Karl Jr., Mark J. Ferguson, Samuel Norton, Young Hwan Park, Jenna Lea, and Ashley Streat-Bartlett. "Civil War Peace Agreement Implementation and State Capacity." Journal of Peace Research 47, no. 3 (2010): 333-46.
  8. Devine, Paula, and Schubotz, Dirk. "Caught up in the past? The views of 16-year olds on community relations in Northern Ireland." Shared Space 10 (2010): 5-22.
  9. Dowler, Lorraine. "No Man's Land: Gender and the geopolitics of mobility in West Belfast, Northern Ireland." Geopolitics 6, no. 3 (2001): 158-76.Fay, Marie Therese, Mike Morrissey, and Marie Smyth. Mapping Troubles-related Deaths and Deprivation in Northern Ireland (Belfast: INCORE, International Conflict Research/CTS, 1998).
  10. Feenan, Dermot. "Justice in Conflict: Paramilitary punishment in Ireland." International Journal of the Sociology of Law 30, no. 2 (2002): 151-72.
  11. Gallaher, Carol, and Peter Shirlow. "The Geography of Loyalist Paramilitary Feuding in Belfast." Space and Polity 10, no. 2 (2006): 149-69.
  12. Galtung, Johan. Essays in Peace Research. Vol.1. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers, 1975. ------. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization (London, UK: SAGE Publ