SavedAdd your journal

Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Çatışma Sonrası Barış İnşası Aracı Olarak Barış Eğitimi

Peace Education as a Post-conflict Peacebuilding Tool1

Vanessa TİNKER
Pages
27–42
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes with a survey of peace education programmes in ethnically/religiously linked post-conflict environments that have made mainstreaming their goal, and identifies areas of future research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article provides a critical analysis of the literature and reports on peace education programmes in countries emerging from violent conflicts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, it begins with an overview of peace education s history.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes with a survey of peace education programmes in ethnically/religiously linked post-conflict environments that have made mainstreaming their goal, and identifies areas of future research.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article provides a critical analysis of the literature and reports on peace education programmes in countries emerging from violent conflicts. First, it begins with an overview of peace education s history. Next, it examines how peace education has been conceptualised, and highlights why it remains poorly defined. The article then proceeds by looking at the development of the international community s use of peace education as a tool to contribute to their peacebuilding efforts in countries emerging from protracted contexts. After that, it reviews the research and evaluation work that has been done on peace education programmes. The article concludes with a survey of peace education programmes in ethnically/religiously linked post-conflict environments that have made mainstreaming their goal, and identifies areas of future research.

Özet

Bu makale, şiddetli çatışma ortamlarından çıkmış ülkelerdeki barış eğitimleri üzerine hazırlanan literatür ve raporlar hakkında eleştirel bir analiz sunmaktadır. Makale, ilk olarak barış eğitiminin tarihinin gözden geçirilmesi ile başlamaktadır. Sonrasında, barış eğitiminin nasıl kavramsallastığını ele almakta ve neden zayıf bir şekilde tanımlanmış olarak kaldığını incelemektedir. Daha sonraki bölümde çalışma, uluslararası toplumun bir araç olarak barış eğitimini uzun çatışma dönemlerinden geçmiş ülkelerdeki kendi barış inşası faaliyetlerine katkı sağlamak amacıyla kullanmaya başlamasının ortaya cıkışını ele almaktadır. Makale, barış eğitimi programları üzerine yapılmış araştırma ve değerlendirme çalışmalarını gözden geçirdikten sonra, etnik ve dini bağlantılı çatışma sonrası çevrelerde gerçekleşen barış eğitimi programlarının genel bir değerlendirmesi ile sona ermekte ve daha detaylı araştırmaların yapılması gereken alanları belirlemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

TİNKER, V. (2022). Çatışma Sonrası Barış İnşası Aracı Olarak Barış Eğitimi. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 27–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/435022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Allen, Lydia, Chantal LaParl-Green, Mana Miyawaki, Nelson Monroe, Siri Siripanlch, and Brandon Thompson. The Peace Education Programme (PEP) Evaluation. New York, NY: Columbia School of Public Affairs, 2009.
  2. Ardizzone, Lisa. “Towards Global Understanding: The Transformative Role of Peace Education.” Current Issues in Comparative Education 4, no. 2 (2002): 16-25.
  3. Arlow, Michael. “Citizenship Education in a Divided Society: The Case of Northern Ireland.” In, Education,Conflict and Social Cohesion, edited by Sabhi Tawil and Alexandra Harley, 255-313. Geneva: UNESCO International Bureau of Education, 2004.
  4. Aydin, Hasan. “Education Reform in Nigeria: the Case of Multicultural Education for Peace, Love, and Tolerance.” South African Journal of Education 33, no. 1 (2013): 1-19.
  5. Azar, Edward. The Management of Protracted Social Conflict. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1990.
  6. Balegamire, Juvenal Bazilashe, Adelaide Dhorsan, and Cristina Tembe. “Curriculum Reform, Political Change, and Reinforcement of National Identify in Mozambique.” In Education, Conflict and Social Cohesion, edited by Sobhi Tawil and Alexandra Harley, 207-53. Geneva: UNESCO International Bureau of Education, 2004.
  7. Bar-Tal, Daniel. “The Elusive Nature of Peace Education.” In Peace Education: The Concept, Principles, and Practices in the World, edited by Gabriel Salomon and Baruch Neve, 27-36.
  8. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Extram, 2002.
  9. Baxter, Pamela. UNHCR Peace Education Programme. Geneva: UNHCR, 2000.
  10. Baxter, Pamela. “The UNHCR Peace Education Programme: Skills for Life.” Forced Migration Review 11(2001): 28-30.
  11. Beckerman, Zvi, and Claire McGlynn. Addressing Ethnic Conflict through Peace Education: International Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2005.
  12. Ben-Porath, Sigal. “War and Peace Education.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 37, no. 3 (2003): 525-33.
  13. Bowder, Marina, and Valery Perry. “Returnees and the Challenges for Education Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina in Ellison.” In Education and Internally Displaced Persons, edited by Christine Smith and Alan Smith, 142-64. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.
  14. Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. An Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations, 1992.
  15. Bretherton, Diane, Jane Weston, and Vic Zbar. “Peace Education in a Post-Conflict Environment: the Case of Sierra Leone.” Prospects 33, no. 2 (2003): 221-30.
  16. Brock-Utne, Bridget. Education for Peace: A Feminist Perspective. New York: Pergamon Press, 1985.
  17. Bush, Kenneth D., and Saltarelli, Diana. The Two Faces of Education in Ethn