Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Iranian Scholars and Theorizing International Relations: Achievements and Challenges1

Pages
103–119
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An evaluation of this structural context suggests that even if theorizing IR from an Iranian point of view is both possible and preferable, this cannot be done unless certain structural constraints are overcome

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the emergence of the Islamic Republic in Iran, social scientists, including international relations (IR) scholars, have been called to develop endogenous/indigenous theories to reflect Iranian/Islamic points of view.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This theorizing has led some Iranian scholars to develop ideas about international life on the basis of Islamic texts and teachings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An evaluation of this structural context suggests that even if theorizing IR from an Iranian point of view is both possible and preferable, this cannot be done unless certain structural constraints are overcome
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Since the emergence of the Islamic Republic in Iran, social scientists, including international relations (IR) scholars, have been called to develop endogenous/indigenous theories to reflect Iranian/Islamic points of view. This theorizing has led some Iranian scholars to develop ideas about international life on the basis of Islamic texts and teachings. Furthermore, due to an increasing awareness of the Eurocentric nature of IR theories over the last few years, the international community of IR scholars has become open to non-Western IR theories. This opening has made homegrown theorizing more attractive to Iranian IR scholars, and debates about it have become more vivid. This article seeks to examine the attempts by the Iranian IR community to conceptualize and theorize IR from Iranian/Islamic points of view and to show how contextual factors have limited such attempts. The first part of the article reviews the IR scholarship in Iran to give a portrait of Iranians’ achievements in this regard. The second part examines contextual factors that may have affected homegrown theorizing in Iran, including international agency, sources of inspiration, the dynamism of the IR community, the relationship between academia and government, and intellectual autonomy. An evaluation of this structural context suggests that even if theorizing IR from an Iranian point of view is both possible and preferable, this cannot be done unless certain structural constraints are overcome

🔖

Cite This Article

MOSHİRZADEH, H. (2022). Iranian Scholars and Theorizing International Relations: Achievements and Challenges1. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 103–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/435005

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acharya, Amitav. “Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World.” International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 1: 95-123 (2011).
  2. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
  3. Ajili, Hadi, and Ali Esmaeeli. “An Introduction to the Concept of Peace in International Relations.” Research in Islamic Politics 1, no. 4 (1392 [2013]): 5-134.
  4. Akhavan Kazemi, Bahram. “Security in The Thought of Farabi and Mohaghegh Toosi.” Islamic Government 52 (1388 [2009]): 89-110.
  5. Alikhani, A. A. “Fundamentals and Principles of International Relations in Islam.” Research in International Relations 12 (1390 [2011]): 11-38.
  6. Ashworth, Lucian. “Interdisciplinary and International Relations.” European Political Science Review 8, no. 1 (2009): 8-25.
  7. Atai, Farhad, and Majid Behestani. “Identity and Otherness in the Formation of Iran from the Shahnameh Perspective.” Iranian Journal of Foreign Affairs 2, no. 4 (1389 [2010]): 79-109.
  8. Azghandi, Alireza. Political Science in Iran. Tehran: Baz, 1378 [1999].
  9. Balaghi, S. S. “International Relations in Islam.” Lessons from Islam 12, no. 5 (1350 [1971]): 33-4.
  10. Barzanooni, M. A. “Islam: The Primacy of War or Peace?” International Legal Journal 33 (1384 [2005]): 73-158.
  11. Behzadi, H. Nationalism: A Theoretical and Practical Analysis. Tehran: Hesab, 1354 [1975].
  12. Behestani, Majid. “Religious Attitude and Foreign Policy: Operational Codes of Bazargan and Ahmadinezhad.” Iranian Journal of Foreign Affairs 5, no. 3 (1392 [2013]): 211-47.
  13. Chillaud, Matthieu. “Peace and Security Re-conceptualizations in the Agenda of PRIO, SIPRI, TAPRI and COPRI since the End of the Cold War.” Presented at the ECPR Conference in Charles University, Prague, December 7-10, 2016.
  14. Dehghani-Firoozabadi, S. J. Islamic Meta Theory of International Relations. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Publication, 1394 [2015]. ———. “Islamic Theory of International Relations: What and How It Is.” Research Letter of Political Science 5, no. 2 (1389b [2010]): 111-42. ———. “Meta-Theoretical Foundations of Islamic Theory of International Relations.” Foreign Relations 2, no. 6 (1389a [2010]): 49-96. ———. “The Model of World Order in Islamic Theory of International Relations.” International Relations Research 1, no. 3 (1389c [2010]): 9-47.
  15. Dehghani-Firoozabadi, S. J., and M. Ghanbari. “Developments in Theoretical Studies of International Rel