Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Computational International Relations What Can Programming, Coding and Internet Research Do for the Discipline?

Pages
157–182
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper argues that computational methods transcend themethodological schism between qualitative and quantitative approaches andform a solid foundation in building truly multi-method research design.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Computational Social Science emerged as a highly technical and populardiscipline in the last few years, owing to the substantial advances in communicationtechnology and daily production of vast quantities of personal data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As per capitadata production significantly increased in the last decade, both in terms of its size(bytes) as well as its detail (heartrate monitors, internet-connected appliances,smartphones), social scientists’ ability to extract meaningful social, political anddemographic information from digital data also increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper argues that computational methods transcend themethodological schism between qualitative and quantitative approaches andform a solid foundation in building truly multi-method research design.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Computational Social Science emerged as a highly technical and populardiscipline in the last few years, owing to the substantial advances in communicationtechnology and daily production of vast quantities of personal data. As per capitadata production significantly increased in the last decade, both in terms of its size(bytes) as well as its detail (heartrate monitors, internet-connected appliances,smartphones), social scientists’ ability to extract meaningful social, political anddemographic information from digital data also increased. A vast methodologicalgap exists in ‘computational international relations’, which refers to the use ofone or a combination of tools such as data mining, natural language processing,automated text analysis, web scraping, geospatial analysis and machine learningto provide larger and better organized data to test more advanced theories ofIR. After providing an overview of the potentials of computational IR and howan IR scholar can establish technical proficiency in computer science (such asstarting with Python, R, QGis, ArcGis or Github), this paper will focus on someof the author’s works in providing an idea for IR students on how to think aboutcomputational IR. The paper argues that computational methods transcend themethodological schism between qualitative and quantitative approaches andform a solid foundation in building truly multi-method research design.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNVER, H. A. (2022). Computational International Relations What Can Programming, Coding and Internet Research Do for the Discipline?. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 157–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/434990

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ahuja, Ravindra K., Thomas L. Magnanti, and James B. Orlin. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. 1 edition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Pearson, 1993.
  2. Alesina, Alberto, Stelios Michalopoulos, and Elias Papaioannou. “Ethnic Inequality.” Journal of Political Economy 124, no. 2 (March 4, 2016): 428–88. doi: 10.1086/685300. Alvarez, R. Michael. Computational Social Science. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  3. Banks, David L., and Nicholas Hengartner. “Social Networks.” In Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008. doi: 10.1002/9780470061596.risk0667. Barberá, Pablo, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker, and Richard Bonneau. “Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?” Psychological Science 26, no. 10 (October 1, 2015): 1531–42. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594620. Barnes, John Arundel. Social Networks. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1972.
  4. Berg, Bernd A., and Thomas Neuhaus. “Multicanonical Algorithms for First Order Phase Transitions.” Physics Letters B 267, no. 2 (September 12, 1991): 249–53. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(91)91256-U. Bermingham, Adam, Maura Conway, Lisa McInerney, Neil O’Hare, and Alan F. Smeaton. “Combining Social Network Analysis and Sentiment Analysis to Explore the Potential for Online Radicalisation.” In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, 231–236. ASONAM ’09. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2009. doi:10.1109/ASONAM.2009.31. Black, Duncan. “On Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem.” The Journal of Law and Economics 12, no. 2 (October 1, 1969): 227–48. doi: 10.1086/466667. Bonnasse-Gahot, Laurent, Henri Berestycki, Marie-Aude Depuiset, Mirta B. Gordon, Sebastian Roché, Nancy Rodriguez, and Jean-Pierre Nadal. “Epidemiological Modeling of the 2005 French Riots: A Spreading Wave and the Role of Contagion.” arXiv:1701.07479 [Physics], January 25, 2017. http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.07479.
  5. Borgatti, Stephen P., Ajay Mehra, Daniel J. Brass, and Giuseppe Labianca. “Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.” Science 323, no. 5916 (February 13, 2009): 892–95. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821. Boulding, Kenneth E. “General Systems Theory—The Skeleton of Science.” Management Science 2, no. 3 (April 1, 1956): 197–208. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2.3.197. Breiger, Ronald L, Scott A Boorman, and Phipps Arabie. “An Algorithm for Clustering Relational Data with Applications to Social Network Analysis and