Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Automated Text Analysis and International Relations: The Introduction and Application of a Novel Technique for Twitter

Pages
183–204
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To illustrate the usefulness of this technique, we present some of ourfindings from a project we conducted on Turkish sentiments on Twitter towardsSyrian refugees.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social media platforms, thanks to their inherent nature of quick and far-reachingdissemination of information, have gradually supplanted the conventional mediaand become the new loci of political communication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant advances in automated textual analysis havetried to address such challenges of social media data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To illustrate the usefulness of this technique, we present some of ourfindings from a project we conducted on Turkish sentiments on Twitter towardsSyrian refugees.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Social media platforms, thanks to their inherent nature of quick and far-reachingdissemination of information, have gradually supplanted the conventional mediaand become the new loci of political communication. These platforms not onlyease and expedite communication among crowds, but also provide researchershuge and easily accessible information. This huge information pool, if it isprocessed with a systematic analysis, can be a fruitful data source for researchers.Systematic analysis of data from social media, however, poses various challengesfor political analysis. Significant advances in automated textual analysis havetried to address such challenges of social media data. This paper introduces onesuch novel technique to assist researchers doing textual analysis on Twitter. Morespecifically, we develop a clustering methodology based on Longest CommonSubsequence Similarity Metric, which automatically groups tweets with similarcontent. To illustrate the usefulness of this technique, we present some of ourfindings from a project we conducted on Turkish sentiments on Twitter towardsSyrian refugees.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYGIN, Y., ARIN, İ., HATİPOĞLU, E., GÖKÇE, O. Z. (2022). Automated Text Analysis and International Relations: The Introduction and Application of a Novel Technique for Twitter. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 183–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/434984

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adler, E. Scott, and John D. Wilkerson. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  2. Arın, İnanç. Impact Assessment & Prediction of Tweets and Topics. Ph.D. thesis, Sabancı University, 2017.
  3. Arın, İnanç, Mert Kemal Erpam, and Yücel Saygın. “I–TWEC: Interactive Clustering Tool for Twitter.” Expert Systems with Applications 96 (2018): 1–13. Barberá, Pablo. Less is More? How Demographic Sample Weights Can Improve Public Opinion Estimates Based on Twitter Data. Working paper, NYU, 2016.
  4. Baron, Naomi S. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  5. Bollen, Johan, Huina Mao, and Alberto Pepe. “Modeling Public Mood and Emotion: Twitter Sentiment and Socio– Economic Phenomena.” ICWSM 11 (2011): 450–53.
  6. Bond, Doug, Joe Bond, Churl Oh, J. Craig Jenkins, and Charles Lewis Taylor. “Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development.” Journal of Peace Research 40, no. 6 (2003): 733–45.
  7. Braithwaite, Alex, and Douglas Lemke. “Unpacking Escalation.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 28, no. 2 (2011): 111–23.
  8. Cambria, Erik, Daniel Olsher, and Dheeraj Rajagopal. “SenticNet 3: A Common and Common–Sense Knowledge Base for Cognition-Driven Sentiment Analysis.” Twenty-eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2014): 1515–21.
  9. Chew, Cynthia, and Gunther Eysenbach. “Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets During The 2009 H1N1 Outbreak.” PloS one 5, no. 11 (2010): e14118. Cottam, Martha L. Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Influence of Cognition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986.
  10. Cull, Nicholas J. “The Long Road to Public Diplomacy 2.0: The Internet in US Public Diplomacy.” International Studies Review 15, no. 1 (2013): 123–39. de Jong, Ms Wilma, Martin Shaw, and Neil Stammers. Global Activism, Global Media. London, UK: Pluto Press, 2005.
  11. Dehkharghani, Rahim, Yucel Saygin, Berrin Yanikoglu, and Kemal Oflazer. “SentiTurkNet: a Turkish Polarity Lexicon for Sentiment Analysis.” Language Resources and Evaluation 50, no. 3 (2016): 667–85.
  12. Demirhan, Kamil. “Social Media Effects on the Gezi Park Movement in Turkey: Politics under Hashtags.” In Social Media in Politics: Case Studies on the Political Power of Social Media, edited by Bogdan Pătruţ and Monica Pătruţ, 281–314. Basel: Springer International Publishing, 2014.
  13. Dugan, Laura, and Erica Chenoweth. “Government Actions in Terror Environments (GATE): A Met