The paper explores the contributions made by IPE in Africa, Asia and South America in order to discuss the possibility of widening IPE’s ‘global conversation’ including peripheral approaches.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The field of IPE has traditionally being conceptualized as an Anglo Saxon construct, in this paper we argue that it is critically important to reflect on the way IPE has developed outside the mainstream, in the periphery, focusing on the case studies of Africa – in particular South Africa; Asia – in particular China; and South America, in order to start a conversation that engages with the contributions of peripheral IPE.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By bringing to light the way IPE has been approached in these regions of the world we identify problems, ideas, and concerns different from those in the North and which also call attention to the necessity of a conscious reading of these works and to opening a dialogue and comparison among them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper explores the contributions made by IPE in Africa, Asia and South America in order to discuss the possibility of widening IPE’s ‘global conversation’ including peripheral approaches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The field of IPE has traditionally being conceptualized as an Anglo Saxon construct, in this paper we argue that it is critically important to reflect on the way IPE has developed outside the mainstream, in the periphery, focusing on the case studies of Africa – in particular South Africa; Asia – in particular China; and South America, in order to start a conversation that engages with the contributions of peripheral IPE. By bringing to light the way IPE has been approached in these regions of the world we identify problems, ideas, and concerns different from those in the North and which also call attention to the necessity of a conscious reading of these works and to opening a dialogue and comparison among them. The paper explores the contributions made by IPE in Africa, Asia and South America in order to discuss the possibility of widening IPE’s ‘global conversation’ including peripheral approaches.
🔖
Cite This Article
DECIANCIO, M., QUILICONI, C. (2022). Widening the ‘Global Conversation’: Highlighting the Voices of IPE in the Global South. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 249–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/434979
Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647–59.
Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London, UK: Routledge, 2010.
Ake, Claude. “The New World Order: A View from Africa.” In Whose World Order, edited by Hans-henrik Holm, 19–42. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Akinjogbin, Isaac Adeagbo, and Segun Osoba. Topics on Nigerian Economic and Social History. Vol. 2. Nigeria: University of Ife Press, 1980.
Amin, Samir. “Accumulation and Development: A Theoretical Model.” Review of African Political Economy 1, no. 1 (1974): 9–26. ———. Accumulation on a World Scale. Monthly Review Press, 1974. ———. Imperialism and Unequal Development. Hassocks: Haverster Press, 1977.
Battaglino, Jorge M. “Política de defensa y política militar durante el Kirchnerismo.” In La Política En Tiempos de Los Kirchner, by Malamud, Andrés and Miguel Alejandro de Luca (coord.), 241–50. Eudeba, 2012.
Beckman, Björn, and Gbemisola Adeoti. Intellectuals and African Development: Pretension and Resistance in African Politics. London; New York: Zed Books, 2006.
Beigel, Fernanda. The Politics of Academic Autonomy in Latin America. Routledge, 2016.
Bilgin, Pinar. “Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 5–23.
Blyth, Mark. “Torn Between Two Lovers? Caught in the Middle of British and American IPE1.” New Political Economy 14, no. 3 (2009): 329–36.
Braz, Adriana Montenegro. “Migration Governance in South America: The Bottom-Up Diffusion of the Residence Agreement of Mercosur.” Revista de Administração Pública 52, no. 2 (2018): 303–20.
Breslin, Shaun. “Beyond the Disciplinary Heartlands: Studying China’s International Political Economy.” In China’s Reforms and International Political Economy, eds. David Zweig and Chen Zhimin, 21–41. London; New York: Routledge, 2007.
Chin, Gregory, Margaret M. Pearson, and Wang Yong. “Introduction–IPE with China’s Characteristics.” Review of International Political Economy 20, no. 6 (2013): 1145–64.
Chodor, Tom, and Anthea McCarthy-Jones. “Post-Liberal Regionalism in Latin America and the Influence of Hugo Chávez.” Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research 19, no. 2 (2013): 211–23.
Cohen, Benjamin J. Advanced International Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. ———. International Political Economy: An Intellectual History