Journals / Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Eleştirel Düşünme ve Ahlaki Gelişimin Örtüşümü

The Interface between Critical Thinking Strategies and Moral Development

Pages
73–85
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this paper is to show howAesop s fables are used to enhance critical thinking strategies and to promote moral development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fables can be excellent windows into the worlds of animals and human beings for children.Moreover, they are fun to read, discuss, envisage and personalize via storytelling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the best known theories of moral development is associated with Lawrence Kohlberg(1971), and it suggests how art might lead to moral development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this paper is to show howAesop s fables are used to enhance critical thinking strategies and to promote moral development.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fables can be excellent windows into the worlds of animals and human beings for children.Moreover, they are fun to read, discuss, envisage and personalize via storytelling. There have been manyfable theorists who have reflected on the definition of fable and its different functions. John Lockerecommended fables to teach language at a time when social concern was growing, particularly ineducation. In the same way, the fabulist La Fontaine also alluded to the instructive aspect or value offables. Fables are kinds of instruction disguised under the allegory of an action with the purpose of moralteaching. One of the best known theories of moral development is associated with Lawrence Kohlberg(1971), and it suggests how art might lead to moral development. L. Kohlberg claims that there is empiricalevidence which shows that there are universal ontogenetic trends towards the development of morality.He explicitly rejects views that moral development is the result of either teaching or maturation. He alsoargues that empirical studies have failed to confirm the findings of psychoanalytic schools; there are nocorrelations between parental modes of handling infantile drives and later behavior and attitudes. Heholds, instead, that moral development is primarily the result of the interaction between the individual andtheir social environment, where role taking is of central importance. The aim of this paper is to show howAesop s fables are used to enhance critical thinking strategies and to promote moral development.

Özet

Fabl çocuklar için hem hayvanlar hem de insan dünyasına açılan mükemmel bir pencere görevindedir. Bunun dışında, fablların, öykü anlatımıyla okunması, tartışılması, imgelenmesi ve kişileştirilmesi çokzevklidir. Fabl nedir ne değildir konusunda yazan sayısız eleştirmen ve düşünür vardır. Bunlardan biriolan John Locke sosyal konularda sorunun olduğu zamanlarda özellikle eğitimde dil öğretiminde fabl kullanımını tavsiye eder. Aynı şekilde La Fontaine de fablın eğitimsel yanını öne çıkartır. Gerçekte fabl, ahlaki ders verme amacıyla yazılmış olan ve alegorik özellik taşıyan öğütlerdir. Ahlaki gelişim kuramlarındanbirini savunan Lawrence Kohlberg sanatın ahlaki gelişmeye yardımcı olabileceğini belirtir. Ahlaki gelişimde evrensel eğilimler olduğunu gösteren deneysel deliller mevcut olduğunu ve ahlaki gelişimin öğretmeveya büyümenin sonucu olduğunu savunan fikirlere şiddetle karşı çıkan L. Kohlberg (1971), deneysel çalışmaların psikoanalitik ekollerin bulgularını çürüttüğünü de savunmaktadır: ebeveynlerin çocuklarınındürtüleriyle başa çıkma yollarıyla kişilerin sonraki davranış ve tutumları arasında bir bağlantı yoktur. Dahaçok bireyin sosyal çevresiyle olan iletişiminin sonucu olduğunu ve bireyin üstlendiği rollerin bu ahlakigelişimde rol oynadığını belirtir. L. Kohlbergin sanatın kişilere ahlak eğitimi verebileceği tezinden hareketle, bu çalışma, Aesop masallarının eleştirel düşünmeyi ve ahlaki gelişimi ne kadar etkileyebileceği üzerinedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUBUKÇU, F. (2022). Eleştirel Düşünme ve Ahlaki Gelişimin Örtüşümü. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 73–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/434163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aesop: The complete f ables. (1998). Trans. R. Temple, & O. Temple. New York: Penguin. Aesop ’s f ables. (1947).
  2. Kingsport, TN: Grosset & Dunlap. Aesop ’s f ables. (1967). Trans. V. S. Vernon Jones. New York: Avenel Books. Aesop ’s f ables. (2003).
  3. Trans. L. Gibbs. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Aesops’ f ables. Retrieved on January 2, 2009 from http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/Aesop/Aesops_
  4. Fables.html Afflerbach, P. P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers’ main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31-46.
  5. Alexander, P., & Judy, J. (1988). The interaction of domain specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educuational Research, 58(4), 375-404.
  6. Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Education Research Journal, 14(4), 367-381.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self -eff icacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: CUP. Beach, R. (1993). A Teacher’s introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Bennett, W. (1993). The book of virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster. Bennett, W. (1995a). The children ’s book of virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster. Bennett, W. (1995b). The moral compass. New York: Simon & Schuster. Billow, R. (1975). A cognitive-developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 11, 415-423.
  8. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  9. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 717-726. van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. Ed. Gernsbacher, M. A., Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 539-588. San Diego: Academic Press. van den Broek, P., Lorch, E., & Thurlow, R. (1997). Children and adults’ memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories and hierarchical level. Child Development, 67(6), 3010-3028.
  10. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn f rom texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21. Carnine,