Journals / Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Thought Experiments in the Sciences

Bilimlerde Düşünce Deneyleri

Pages
125–138
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, through the presentation of several examples, some of the basic functions of thought experiments are exhibited.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Thought experiments are ubiquitous in the sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We can trace their use back to the age of the Pre-Socratic philosophers, but from the start of the seventeenth century onwards, scientists such as Galileo, Newton and Leibniz recognized the very great importance of these mental instruments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, through the presentation of several examples, some of the basic functions of thought experiments are exhibited.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: Thought experiments are ubiquitous in the sciences. We can trace their use back to the age of the Pre-Socratic philosophers, but from the start of the seventeenth century onwards, scientists such as Galileo, Newton and Leibniz recognized the very great importance of these mental instruments. To be sure, in our own time, thought experiments play a pivotal role in relativistic physics and in quantum mechanics. This paper aims to investigate these important instruments of scientific reasoning from a philosophical point of view. Firstly, a short historical background is presented concerning thought experiments and their use in the sciences is discussed. Secondly, a well-known example is presented, in order to show some of the common features of thought experiments. Finally, through the presentation of several examples, some of the basic functions of thought experiments are exhibited.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, M. E. (2022). Thought Experiments in the Sciences. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 125–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/433962

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bishop M. (1998). “An Epistemological Role for Thought Experiments”. Ed. N. Shanks. Idealization IX: Idealization in Contemporary Physics (1998) 19-33. Amsterdam/Atlanta. Bishop M. (1999). “Why Thought Experiments are Not Arguments”. Philosophy of Science 66 (1999) 534-541.
  2. Brown J. R. (1986). “Thought Experiments since the Scientific Revolution”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1986) 1-15.
  3. Brown J. R. (1991). Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London 1991.
  4. Darwin C. (1970). Türlerin Kökeni. Çev. Öner Ünalan. Ankara 1970.
  5. Duhem P. (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton 1954.
  6. Einstein A. (1949). “Autobiographical Notes”. Ed. Schilpp, A. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, La Salle. Galileo G. (1632/1967). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Çev. S. Drake. University of California Press, Berkeley 1632/1967.
  7. Gendler T. S. (1998). “Galileo and the Indispensability of Scientific Thought Experiment”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1998) 397-424. Gilbert J. & Reiner M. (2004). “The symbiotic roles of empirical experimentation and thought experimentation in the learning of physics”. International Journal of Science Education 26/15 (2004) 1819-1834.
  8. Gooding D. C. (1993). “What is Experimental About Thought Experiments?”. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2 (1993) 280-290.
  9. Grant E. (2010). The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages. Washington 2010.
  10. Ierodiakonou K. (2005). “Ancient Thought Experiments: A First Approach”. Ancient Philosophy 25 (2005) 125-140.
  11. Ierodiakonou K. (2011). “Remarks on the History of an Ancient Thought Experiment”. Eds. Sophie Roux & Katerina Ierodiakonou. Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts 15 (2011) 37-49.
  12. Leiden. King P. (1991). “Mediaeval Thought-Experiments: The Metamethodology of Mediaeval Science”. Eds. Horowitz, T. and Massey, G. Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy (1991) 43-64. Lanham. Koyré A. (2007). Bilim Tarihi Yazıları. Çev. Kurtuluş Dinçer. Ankara 2007.
  13. Kuhn T. S. (1994). Asal Gerilim. Çev. Yakup Şahan. İstanbul 1994.
  14. Lennox J. G. (1991). “Darwinian Thought Experiments: A Function for Just-So Stories”. Eds. Horowitz, T. and Massey. Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy (1991) 223-245.
  15. Lanham. Lennox J. G. (1991). “Darwinian Thought Experiments: A Function for Just-So Stories”. Eds. Tamara Horowitz and Gerald J. Mossey. Thought Experimen