Journals / Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

The Factors Effecting Reading Literacy in the Programme for International Students' Achievement (PISA) 2009

2009 Yılı Uluslararası Öğrenci Başarı Programında (PISA) Okuma Becerisini Etkileyen Faktörlere Yönelik Uygulama

Pages
191–206
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of multiple linear regression analysis, it was found that the determined variables identified the 14.1 portion of reading.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the factors effecting the reading literacy of 15 year old age-group students in Turkey, within the context of the Programme for International Student's Achievment (PISA) 2009.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study involved 4996 students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of multiple linear regression analysis, it was found that the determined variables identified the 14.1 portion of reading.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the factors effecting the reading literacy of 15 year old age-group students in Turkey, within the context of the Programme for International Student's Achievment (PISA) 2009. The study involved 4996 students. To determine the factors effecting reading literacy, analysis based on sub-problems was conducted. In this analysis, firstly an exploratory factor analysis by questionnaire was conducted concerning questions relating to interest and learning strategies. Then the defined factors were analyzed based upon confirmatory factor analysis and, finally, linear regression analysis was conducted to establish the reading literacy explanation ratio of the defined factors. Based upon these results, a 7-factor stucture related to reading literacy was derived and confirmatory factor analysis of the 7-factored structure was confirmed. This defined 7-factor structure explained 59.71 percent of the total variation. As a result of multiple linear regression analysis, it was found that the determined variables identified the 14.1 portion of reading.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUNER, T., GÜZELLER, S. O. (2022). The Factors Effecting Reading Literacy in the Programme for International Students' Achievement (PISA) 2009. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 191–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/433939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Albayrak A. S. (2006). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara 2006. Anderson J. C. & Gerbing D. W. (1988). “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach”. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 411-423.
  2. Applebee A. N., Langer J. A. & Mullis I. V. S. (1988). Who Reads Best? Factors Related to Reading Achievement in Grades 3, 7, and 11. New Jersey 1988.
  3. Assor, A., Kaplan H. & Roth G. (2002). “Choice is Good, but Relevance is Excellent: Autonomy- Enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviours in Predicting Student’s Engagement in School Work”. British Journal of Educational Psychology 72 (2002) 261-278. Baker L. & Wigfield A. (1999). “Dimensions of Children’s Motivation for Reading and Their Relations to Reading Activity and Reading Achievement”. Reading Research Quarterly 34 8 (1999) 452-497.
  4. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2002). “Faktör Analizi: Temel Kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi 32 (2002) 470-483.
  5. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygula- maları ve Yorumu. Ankara 2012.
  6. Byrne B. M. (1989). A primer of LJSREL: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models. New York 1989. Chiu M. M. & McBride-Chang C. (2006). “Gender, Context, and Reading: A Comparison of Students in 41 countries”. Scientific Studies of Reading 10 (2006) 331-362. Cipielewski J. & Stanovich K. E. (1992). “Predicting Growth in Reading Ability from Children’s Exposure to Print”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 54 (1992) 74-89. Cunningham A. E. & Stanovich K. E. (1998). “Early Reading Acquisition and its Relation to Reading Experience and Ability 10 Years Later”. Developmental Psychology 33/6 (1998) 934-945.
  7. Çokluk Ö., Şekercioğlu G. & Büyüköztürk Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara 2010.
  8. Durik A. M., Vida M. & Eccles J. S. (2006). “Task Values and Ability Beliefs as Predictors of High School Literacy Choices: A Developmental Analysis”. Journal of Educational Psychology 98/2 (2006) 382-393.
  9. Gottfried A. E. (1990). “Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Young Elementary School Children”. Journal of Educational Psychology 82/3 (1990) 525-538.
  10. Greene B. A., Miller R. B., Crowson M., Duke B. L. & Akey K. L. (2004). “Predicting High School Students’ Cognitive Engagement and Achievement: Contributions of Classroom Perceptions and Motivation”. Contempora