Journals / Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

An Evaluation of the Potential of the City of Antalya to Become Part of UNESCO s Creative Cities Network

Unesco Yaratıcı Kentler Ağı ile Antalya Kentinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion it was emphasized that this research may provide significant information for all stakeholders and institutions involved in both tourism destination planning and application. a

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Today, creativity is considered a strategic factor in sustainable tourism management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Creative tourism comprises more educational, emotional, social and the participants interaction between destination, culture and people.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion it was emphasized that this research may provide significant information for all stakeholders and institutions involved in both tourism destination planning and application. a
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: Today, creativity is considered a strategic factor in sustainable tourism management. Creative tourism comprises more educational, emotional, social and the participants interaction between destination, culture and people. While developing creative tourism, the local population and the destination managers in the regions are able to further develop, to regard creativity as a region s resource and to evaluate the opportunities to answer the tourists increasing requirement for new experiences. This research attempts to explain what the tourism creative process should look like, and what should be done in respect to creative tourism of cities within the scope of the UNESCO Creative Cities Network. Firstly a review of the literature on creativity in tourism and UNESCO Creative Cities Network was made. Documentation representing an example of the application of the UNESCO Creative Cities Network practices was found on the Internet and analysed. In the second part of this research, the important tourism destination of Antalya was chosen ascase study and research about what and, how that what should be done, within the tourism creativity process and its application was undertaken. The qualitative method was used in this research. Data derived from documentation analysis and from interviews was evaluated through the content analysis method. In conclusion it was emphasized that this research may provide significant information for all stakeholders and institutions involved in both tourism destination planning and application. a

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİZEL, B., AJANOVİC, E. (2022). An Evaluation of the Potential of the City of Antalya to Become Part of UNESCO s Creative Cities Network. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/433933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andersson L. & Thomsen B. S. (2008). “Performative experiments and cultural re-planning – Recaptuling the spectacle of the city”. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 20 (2008) 39-51.
  2. Bourdieu P. (1984). Distinciton: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge 1984. Crewe L. & Beverstock J. (1998). “Fashioning the city: Cultures of consumption in contemporary urban spaces”. Geoform 29 (1998) 287- 308. Florida R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York 2002. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/creative-cities-network/about-creative-cities http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/creative-cities-network/evaluation-and-studies http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/creative-cities-network/interviews-and-articles
  3. Mommaas H. (2009). “The turn of inheritance in tango: Official policies, tourism, dance championship in the city of Buenos Aires”. Cuadernos de Antropologia Social 30 (2009) 155-172. Pine J. & Gilmore J. (1999). The Experience Economy. Boston 1999.
  4. Ray C. (1998). “Culture, Intellectual Property and Territorial Rural Development”. Sociologia Ruralis 38 (1998) 3-20.
  5. Raymond C. (2007). “Creative Tourism New Zealand: The practical challenges of developing creative tourism”. Eds. Richards G. & Wilson J. Tourism, Creativity and Development (2007) 145-157.
  6. London. Rhodes M. (1961). “An Analysis of Creativity”. Phi Delta Kappan 42 (1961) 305-310.
  7. Richards G. (2011). “Creativity and Tourism”. Annals of Tourism Research 38/4 (2011) 1225-1253. Richards G. & Raymond C. (2000). “Creative tourism”. ATLAS News 23 (2000) 16-20.
  8. Richards G. (2010). “Tourism Development Trajectories-from culture to creativity?”. Tourism and Management Studies 6 (2010) 9-15.
  9. Richards G. (2011). “Creativity and Tourism”. Annals of Tourism Research 38/4 (2011) 1225-1253. Richards G. & Willson J. (2006). “Developing Creativity in Tourism Experiences: A Solution to the Serial Reproduction of Culture?”. Tourism Management 27 (2006) 1408-1413.
  10. Robinson J. R. (2008). “Webster's Dictionary Definition of Creativity”. Online Journal for Workfoce Education and Development 3, http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ojwed/vol3/iss2/2/
  11. Tan S. K., Kung S. F. & Luh D. B. (2013). “A Model of ''Creative Experience'' in Creative Tourism”. Annals of Tourism Research 41 (2013) 153-174.
  12. Taylor C. (1988). “Various Approaches to and Definitions of Creativity”. Ed. R. J. Ste