SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The Mediatory Role of the Employee Voice between Motivational Language and Entrepreneurship

Güdüleyici Dil ve İç Girişimcilik Arasında İşgören Sesliliğinin Aracı Rolü

Sultan SALUR
Serdar YENER
Pages
453–466
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mediating effect of the employee voice was studied using this research data with the results obtained through statistical analysis, which was completed by means of SPSS 21 and Hayes Macro 2.15

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today organizations are trying intensively to use their resources in an efficient and productive way in order to gain competitive advantage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Employees are allowed to speak without fear of interpersonal reaction and pressure, in the motivational dialogue process, in order to increase both efficiency and productivity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mediating effect of the employee voice was studied using this research data with the results obtained through statistical analysis, which was completed by means of SPSS 21 and Hayes Macro 2.15
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today organizations are trying intensively to use their resources in an efficient and productive way in order to gain competitive advantage. They believe that their sustainability is a result of innovation and creativity. Different dimensions of leadership theories are the subject of different research studies of employee psychology. The leader’s motivational language is seen as one of the tools in the business empowering process. Employees are allowed to speak without fear of interpersonal reaction and pressure, in the motivational dialogue process, in order to increase both efficiency and productivity. Within this context the effect of the leader’s motivational language concerning entrepreneurship and the mediating effect of the employee voice is questioned. The employees of a local factory manufacturing textiles formed the research sample. The mediating effect of the employee voice was studied using this research data with the results obtained through statistical analysis, which was completed by means of SPSS 21 and Hayes Macro 2.15

Özet

Günümüzde rekabet avantajı elde etmek isteyen işletmeler giderek daha yoğun bir şekilde insan kaynaklarının verimli ve etkin kullanımı için çalışmaktadır. İşletmeler sürdürülebilirliklerinin yenilik ve yaratıcılıktan geçtiğine daha fazla inanmaktadırlar. Çalışan psikolojisini anlama gayretinde liderlik kuramlarının her geçen yeni bir boyutu çalışmalara konu olmaktadır. Örgütü tüm boyutlarıyla güçlendirme araçlarından bir tanesi olarak liderlerin kullandığı güdüleyici dil görülmektedir. Güdüleyici dil yoluyla oluşan destekleyici örgütsel ortamda çalışanların herhangi bir önyargı veya tepkiye maruz kalmadan verimlilik ve etkinliği artıracak öneri ve tekliflerini sunacakları düşünülmektedir. Bu bağlamda liderlerin kullanmış olduğu güdüleyici dilin çalışanların iç girişimciliklerine olan etkisinde işgören sesliliğinin aracı rolü irdelenmiştir. Çalışmanın örneklemini Sinop'ta faaliyet gösteren yerel bir tekstil üretim fabrikasının çalışanları oluşturmaktadır. SPSS 21 ve Hayes Macro 2.15 ile yapılan istatistiki analizlere göre işören sesliliğinin güdüleyici dil ve iç girişimcilik arasında aracı rolü gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALUR, S., YENER, S. (2022). The Mediatory Role of the Employee Voice between Motivational Language and Entrepreneurship. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 453–466. https://ajindex.com/articles/433840

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Antoncic B. & Hisrich R. D. (2001). “Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation”. Journal of Business Venturing 16/5 (2001) 495-527. Arslan A. & Yener S. (2015). “İşgören Sesliliği Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 14/1 (2015).
  2. Bae K., Chuma H., Kato T., Kim D. & Ohashi I. (2010). “High Performance Work Practices and Employee Voice”. IZA Discussion Paper (2010) 49-56. Baron R. M. & Kenny D. A. (1986). “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51/6 (1986) 11-73.
  3. Bass B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York 1985. Bass B. M. & Avolio B. J. (1990). Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. California 1990. Bass B. M. & Riggio R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Utah 2006.
  4. Becker G. S. (1964). Human Capital Theory. Columbia 1964.
  5. Blau P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in social Life. New York 1964.
  6. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara 2010.
  7. Cappelli P. (2001). “Making the Most of On-Line Recruiting”. Harvard Business Review 79/3 (2001) 139-46. Detert J. R. & Burris E. R. (2007). “Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?”. Academy of Management Journal 50/4 (2007) 869-884.
  8. Edmondson A. (1999). “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams”. Administrative Science Quarterly 44/2 (1999) 350-383.
  9. Fayolle A. (2004). Entrepreneuriat. Apprendre à Entreprendre. Paris 2004. Helfat C. E. & Lieberman M. B. (2002). “The Birth of Capabilities: Market Entry and the Importance of Pre-History”. Industrial and Corporate Change 11/4 (2002) 725-760.
  10. Hirschmann A. O. (1970). “Exit, Voice and Loyalty”. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (1970). Cambridge. Hisrich R. D. & Peters M. P. (2002). Entrepreneurship. New York 2002. Jong J. D. & Wennekers S. (2008). “Intrapreneurship; Conceptualizing Entrepreneurial Employee Behavior”. Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs (SCALES), Zoetermeer: EIM (2008)1-47. Klepper S. & Thompson P. (2006). “Intra-Industry Spinoffs”. The Evolution of Ideas in Innovation and Entrepreneurship 36 (2006).
  11. Kuratko F. K., Hornsby J. S. & Sabatine F. J. (1999). The Breakthrough Experience: A Guide to Corporate Entrepreneurship. Muncie 1999. L