Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7

Strategic Trade Policies

Stratejik Dış Ticaret Politikaları

Pages
48–66
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But, at the same time, advocates of this policy always claim that, comparative advantage is realistic argument and free trade is the best -and right- policy under perfect competition and Pareto-optimum conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Strategic trade policy in world markets has been a popular and relatively new research topic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The recent theoretical literature on strategic trade policy argument suggests that with government intervention -for example with export promotion, tariffs, etc..-, governments may enable domestic firms to capture economic rents from foreign firms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But, at the same time, advocates of this policy always claim that, comparative advantage is realistic argument and free trade is the best -and right- policy under perfect competition and Pareto-optimum conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Strategic trade policy in world markets has been a popular and relatively new research topic. The recent theoretical literature on strategic trade policy argument suggests that with government intervention -for example with export promotion, tariffs, etc..-, governments may enable domestic firms to capture economic rents from foreign firms. So, this argument shows that, by supporting its firms in international competition, a government can raise national welfare at another country's expense. This policy suggests that under imperfect competition the governments must pursuit strategic trade policies. But, at the same time, advocates of this policy always claim that, comparative advantage is realistic argument and free trade is the best -and right- policy under perfect competition and Pareto-optimum conditions.

Özet

Son yıllarda, dünya ticaret piyasasında, özellikle sanayileşmiş ülkelerin dış ticaret yapısında stratejik dış ticaret politikalarının etkili olduğu gözlenmektedir. Pek çok sanayileşmiş ülke hükümeti, tarife ya da ihracat sübvansiyonu gibi çeşitli ticaret politikalarıyla kendi yerli firmalarını koruyarak, oligopolistik piyasada oluşan iktisadi rantların (ya da karların) yabancı firmadan yerli firmaya doğru aktarılmasını sağlamakta ve böylece bir başka ülkenin refahı pahasına, ulusal refahını arttırabilmektedir. Her ne kadar "korumacı-müdahaleci politikalar" öne sürse de, stratejik dış ticaret politikaları yaklaşımı serbest dış ticaret argümanına karşı geliştirilmiş bir politika değildir. Yaklaşımın asıl savunucularına göre, tam rekabet ve Pareto-optimum koşullar altında serbest dış ticaret politikası doğru ve gerçekçi bir politika olmaktadır. Fakat, kimi koşullarda, yurt içi çarpıklıklar nedeniyle, stratejik dış ticaret politikaları ikinci en iyi politika olarak savunulabilir politikalar haline gelmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAÇAY, H. Ç. (2022). Strategic Trade Policies. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7, 48–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/433266

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. ALAM, A. (1995) The New Trade Theory and its Relevance to the Trade Policies of Developing Countries, The World Economy, 18, 367-385.
  2. BALBAO, O. & DAUGHETY, A. (2002) Market Structure and the Demand for Free Trade, Vanderbilt University Working Paper, 01-W12R. BENOIT, J. ve KRISHNA, V. (1985)
  3. Finitely Repeated Games, Econometrica,53,905-922.
  4. BRANDER, J. ve SPENCER, R. (1985) Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry, Journalof'International'Economics, 18, 83-100.
  5. BRANDER, J. (1986) Rationales for Strategic Trade and Industrial Policy, P. Krugman (der.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics içinde, Cambridge: MIT Press, 23-46.
  6. BRANDER, J. (1995)
  7. Strategic Trade Policy, NBER Working Paper, 5020. COLLIE, D. & MEZA, D. (2002) Comparative Advantantage and the Pursuit of Strategic Trade Policy, http:www.bodnant.freeserve.co.uk. DIXIT, A. (1986) Trade Policy: An Agenda for Research, P. Krugman (der.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics içinde, Cambridge: MIT Press, 284-304.
  8. DIXIT, A. ve GROSSMAN, G. M. (1986) Targeted Export Promotion with Several Oligopolistic Industries, Journal of Internaional Economics, 21, 23-49.
  9. EATON, J. & GROSSMAN, G. (1986) Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly, Quarterly journal of Econonmics, 101, 383-406.
  10. GROSSMAN, G. & MAGGI, G. (1997) Free Trade versus Strategic Trade, a Peek into Pandora's Box, NBER Working Paper 6211. HORSTMAN, I. & MARKUSEN, J. R. (1986) Up the Average Curve: Inefficient Entry and the New Protectionism, journal of International Economics, 20, 225-247.
  11. INNES, N. D. (1988)
  12. Kapitalizm ve Altın, Satiıgan, N ve S. Savran (der.), Dünya Kapitalizminin Bunalımı içinde, istanbul: Alan Yayıncılık, 181-199.
  13. IRWIN, D. A. (1991) Retrospectives: Challenges to Free Trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 201-209.
  14. KLEMPERER, P. & MEYER, M. (1989) Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty, Econometrica, 57,1243-1277.
  15. KRUGMAN, P. (1979)
  16. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and Interrnational Trade, Journal of International Economics, 9, 469-479.
  17. KRUGMAN, P. (1984) Import Protection as Export Promotion: International Competition in the Presence of Oligopoly and Economies of Scale, H. Kierzkowski (der.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade içinde, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 180-193.
  18. KRUGMAN, P. (1986) Strategic Track Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  19. KRUGMAN, P. (1987) Is Free Trade Passe?