Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9

Tax Competition and Its Dimensionin the Process of Globalization

Küreselleşme Sürecinde Vergi Rekabeti ve Boyutları

Pages
93–122
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Than this paper assesses the studies of EU and OECD to related harmful tax competition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Until the 1980’s, countries based the development of their national economies on policies of import substitution, protecting their national industrial by imposing high customs barriers and strict control of foreign investment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the early 1980’s these policies have changed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Than this paper assesses the studies of EU and OECD to related harmful tax competition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Until the 1980’s, countries based the development of their national economies on policies of import substitution, protecting their national industrial by imposing high customs barriers and strict control of foreign investment. In the early 1980’s these policies have changed. Increased globalization has limited the power of domestic policies in the area of taxation and increased tax competition. This paper is argued the relationship between globalization and tax competition to be a very important problem. I study whether international tax coordination can alleviate these problems. Than this paper assesses the studies of EU and OECD to related harmful tax competition.

Özet

1980’lere kadar ülkeler ekonomilerinin gelişimini; ithal ikameci ve korumacı ulusal sanayiye dayandırmışlardır. Bunun gereği olarak yabancı yatırımlar için sıkı kontrol ve gümrük engelleri uygulayan politikalar benimsemişlerdir. 1980’lerin başında bu politikalar değişmiştir. Artan küreselleşme, vergileme alanında ulusal politikaların gücünü sınırlamakta ve vergi rekabetini artırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada vergi rekabeti ve küreselleşme ilişkisi anlatılmaktadır. Önemli bir sorun olan zararlı vergi rekabeti, yarattığı sonuçlar açıklanmakta, uluslararası işbirliğinin bu sorunları azaltıp azaltmayacağı ve daha sonra zararlı vergi rekabetiyle ilgili AB ve OECD tarafından yapılan çalışmalar değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GİRAY, F. (2022). Tax Competition and Its Dimensionin the Process of Globalization. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9, 93–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/433252

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AKTAN, C.C. (2004) Müdahaleci Devlet ve Uluslararası Rekabet Gücü,www.can.aktan.org ASHER, M. G. and RAJAN, R. S. (October, 1999) Globalization and Tax Systems: Implications for Developing Countries with Particular Reference to Southeast Asia, Discussion Paper, No: 99/23, Adelaide: Adelaide University. 1-37.
  2. BHAGWATI, J. (1991) Political Economy and International Economics, (Ed: D.A. Irwin), Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
  3. BJORVATN, K. and SCHJELDERUP, G. (March, 2002) Tax Competition and International Public Goods, International Tax and Public Finance, 9(2), 111-120.
  4. BRETSCHGER, L. and HETTICH, F. (2002) Globalization Capital Mobility and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries, European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 695-716. Canadian Tax Letter (July, 2000) OECD Issues Hit List of Tax Havens and Harmful Tax Regimes. COADY, D. and DRÉZE, J. (2000) Commodity Taxation and Social Welfare: The Generalized Ramsey Rule, International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 295. 316. CULLIS, J. and JONES, P. (1998) Public Finance and Public Choice: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. ÇALICIOĞLU, E. E. (2003) Küreselleşme ve Vergilendirmede Yeni Eğilimler, İstanbul:
  6. Kazancı Kitap Ticaret A.Ş. DEHEJIA, V. H. and GENSCHEL, P. (February, 1998) Tax Competition in the European Union, Discussion Paper, 1-40.
  7. DEVEREUX, M.P., GRIFFITH, R. and KLEMM, A. (2002) Corporate Income Tax Reform and International Tax Competition, London: EDWARDS, C. and RUGGY, V. D. (April, 2002) International Tax Competition A 21 st- Century Restraint on Government, Policy Analysis. EGGERT, W. (2001) Capital Tax Competition with Socially Wasteful Government Consumption, European Journal of Political Economy, 17, 517-529.
  8. EIJFFINGER, S. C. W. and WAGNER, W. (2001) Taxation If Capital is not percetly Mobile: Tax Competition Versus Tax Exportation, Discussion Papers. EYÜPGİLLER, S. (Şubat, 2000) Vergi Cennetleri ve Tercihli Vergi Sistemleri: Uygun Olmayan Vergi Rekabetinin 1998 OECD Vergi Komitesi Raporu Işığı Altında Değerlendirilmesi, Vergi Dünyası, 222. Free Trade Zones and Free Trade Agreements (2000) http://www.local.attac.org/ 13/documents/2F_enPDF. GAFFNEY, M. (2002) The Worldwide Benefits of International Tax Competition, The Progress Report, http://www.progress.org/archive/gaffne.10htm.
  9. GENSCHEL, P. (2001)
  10. Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Viability of the Welfare State, MPIfG Working Paper. GİRAY, F. (Nisan, 2004)
  11. Vergi rekabeti ve Serbest Bölgeler, Vergi Dünyası, 23 (272), 175