Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 10

Deliberative Democracy as a Solution to the Dilemmas of Liberal Democracy

Liberal Demokrasinin Çıkmazlarına Çözüm Olarak Müzakereci Demokrasi

Pages
139–162
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the section of conclusion, the problems which the deliberative democracy may produce are emphasised but it is also held that these problems can be overcome.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article argues that the model of deliberative democracy is a considerable solution in the face of seeking an alternative system owing to the fact that liberal democracy which is widely implemented as a political system remains insufficient to overcome the problems encountered by present societies and creates legitimacy crisis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with this aim, in the article firstly the problems by which liberal democracy is currently challenged are discussed, secondly the proposals which may possibly overcome the problems of liberal democracy are discussed and the system of liberal democracy as a model is introduced.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the section of conclusion, the problems which the deliberative democracy may produce are emphasised but it is also held that these problems can be overcome.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article argues that the model of deliberative democracy is a considerable solution in the face of seeking an alternative system owing to the fact that liberal democracy which is widely implemented as a political system remains insufficient to overcome the problems encountered by present societies and creates legitimacy crisis. In accordance with this aim, in the article firstly the problems by which liberal democracy is currently challenged are discussed, secondly the proposals which may possibly overcome the problems of liberal democracy are discussed and the system of liberal democracy as a model is introduced. In the section of conclusion, the problems which the deliberative democracy may produce are emphasised but it is also held that these problems can be overcome.

Özet

Bu makale, bugün bir siyasal demokrasi modeli olarak yaygın bir biçimde uygulanmakta olan liberal demokrasinin günümüz toplumlarının karşılaştığı sorunların üstesinden gelme konusunda yetersiz kalması ve meşruiyet bunalımı yaratması nedeniyle alternatif sistem arayışları karşısında müzakereci demokrasi modelinin ciddi bir çözüm olabileceğini savunmaktadır. Bu amaca uygun olarak makalede öncelikle liberal demokrasinin bugün karşılaştığı sorunlar tartışılmakta, daha sonra liberal demokrasinin sorunlarının üstesinden gelebilecek teklifler ortaya konulmakta ve bir model olarak müzakerece demokrasi sistemi tanıtılmaktadır. Sonuç bölümünde ise müzakereci demokrasinin ortaya çıkarabileceği muhtemel sorunlar vurgulanmakta, ancak bu sorunların üstesinden gelinebileceği savunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİTEMBÖLÜKBAŞI, Ş. (2022). Deliberative Democracy as a Solution to the Dilemmas of Liberal Democracy. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 10, 139–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/433248

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ARENDT, H. (1967)
  2. Truth and Politics, Philosophy, Politics and Society, P. Laslett ve W. G. Runciman (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford. BENHABIB, S. (1966) Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy, Democracy and Difference, Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Princeton University Press,
  3. Princeton. BESETTE, J. M. (1993)
  4. The Mild Voice of Reason, University of Chicago Press,
  5. Chicago. BOHMAN, J. (1999)
  6. Citizenship and Norms of Publicity, Political Theory, 27(2). BOHMAN, J. (1998) Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4). CHRISLIP, D. D. (1993)
  7. The Failure of Traditional Politics, National Civic Review, 82 (2). DANIELS, N. ve EZEKIEL J. (1996) Is Justice Enough?, Ends and Means in Bioethics, 26(6). DRYZEK, J. (1990) Green Reason: Communicative Ethics and the Biosphere, Environmental Ethics, 12. ELLMERS, G. (2000) Can We Talk?, Human Events, 56(44). ELSTER, J. (1998) Deliberation and Constitution Making Deliberative Democracy, J. Elster (ed.), Cambridge University Press,
  8. Cambridge. EVANS, S. M. ve BOYTE, H. C. (1992) Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America, Harper and Row, New York. FAIRFIELD, P. (1999)
  9. Deliberative Democracy, Review of Politics, 61(3). FISHKIN, J. (1995)
  10. The Voice of the People, Yale University Press,
  11. Yale. GREIFF, P. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Group Representation, Social Theory and Practice, 26(3). GUTMANN, A. (1996),
  12. Democracy, Philosophy, and Justification, Democracy and Difference, S. Benhabib (ed.), Princeton University Press,
  13. Princeton. GUTMANN, A. ve THOMPSON, D. (1998) Deliberative Democracy,Liberal Education, 84(1). HABERMAS, J. (1996)
  14. Between Facts and Norms, Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Translated by W. Rehg, MA: MIT, Cambridge. HUNOLD, C. ve YOUNG, I. M. (1996)
  15. Justice, Democracy and Hazardous Siting, Political Studies, 46. KAHANE, D. (2000)
  16. Pluralism, Deliberation, and Citizen Competence: Recent Developments in Democratic Theory, Social Theory and Practice, 26(3). KATZ, E. (1992) On Parenting a Paradigm: Gabriel Tarde's Agenda for Opinion and Communication Research, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4. KIM, J. ve WYATT, R. O. (1999)
  17. News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy, Political Communication, 16(4). KNIGHT, J. ve JOHNSON, J. (1994) Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy, Political Theory, 22(2). LEWIS, R. S. (1994) Citize