SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9

Effects of Structural Dimension on Innovation Process When Individual's Department Based Perceptions About Slack Resources are High

Bireylerin Bölüm Bazlı Bolluk Algılarının Yüksek Düzeyde Olduğu Durumlarda, Örgütsel Yapı Unsurlarının Yenilik Süreci Üzerine Etkileri

Mehmet ERYILMAZ
Pages
79–92
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But, in this study, relations between innovation process and structural dimensions will be discussed according to situation that individual’s department based perceptions about slack resources are high.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are a lot of studies about relations between innovation process and structural dimensions of organizations in the organization theory literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are a lot of studies about relations between innovation process and structural dimensions of organizations in the organization theory literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But, in this study, relations between innovation process and structural dimensions will be discussed according to situation that individual’s department based perceptions about slack resources are high.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are a lot of studies about relations between innovation process and structural dimensions of organizations in the organization theory literature. But, in this study, relations between innovation process and structural dimensions will be discussed according to situation that individual’s department based perceptions about slack resources are high.

Özet

Literatür incelendiği takdirde, yenilik süreci ve örgütsel yapı unsurları arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen çok sayıda çalışmanın yapılmış olduğu görülebilecektir. Bu çalışmada ise salt yenilik süreci ve örgütsel yapı unsurları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek yerine; bireylerin kendi bölümlerine ilişkin bolluk algılarının yüksek olması durumunda, örgütsel yapı unsurlarının yenilik süreci üzerindeki etkilerinde bir değişiklik olup olmayacağı veya olacaksa hangi yönde olacağı tartışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERYILMAZ, M. (2022). Effects of Structural Dimension on Innovation Process When Individual's Department Based Perceptions About Slack Resources are High. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9, 79–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/433237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. AIKEN, M. ve HAGE, J. (1971) The Organic Organization and Innovation, Sociology, Vol. 5., 63-82.
  2. BECKER, S. W. ve WHISLER, T. L. (1967) The Innovative Organizations: A Selective View of Current Theory and Research, The Journal of Business, Vol.40, 462- 69. BINGHAM, R. D. (1978)
  3. Innovation, Bureaucracy, and Public Policy: A Study of Innovation Adoptation by Local Government, The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 31, No.2, 178-205.
  4. BLAU, J. R. ve MCKINLEY, W. (1979)
  5. Ideas, Complexity, and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, No.2., 210-19.
  6. BOLTON, M. K. (1993) Organizational Innovation and Substandart Performance: When is the Necessity the Mother of Innovation?,Organization Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, 57-75.
  7. BOURGEOIS, L. J. III (1981) On the Measurement of Organizational Slack, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.6, No.1, 29-39.
  8. BUSCH, TOR (2002) Slack in Public Administration: Conceptual and Methodological Issues, Managerial Auditing Journal, 17/3, 153-59.
  9. COLLINS, P. D., HAGE, J. ve HULL M. F. (1988) Organizational and Technological Predictors of Change in Automaticity, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, 512-43.
  10. CORWIN, R. (1969)
  11. Patterns of Organizational Conflict, Adminstrative Science Quarterly, Vol.14, No.4, 507-22.
  12. DAFT, R. L. (1998)
  13. Organization Theory and Design, South Western College Publishing, Cincinati, Ohio. DALE, E. (1973) Management: Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Newyork. DAMANPOUR, F. (1991) Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol 34, Issue 3, 555-90.
  14. DAMANPOUR, F. (1996) Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models, Management Science, Volume 42, Issue 5, 693-716.
  15. DAMANPOUR, F. ve EVAN, W. M. (1984) Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of “Organizational Lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.29, Issue 3, 392-409.
  16. DEWAR, R. D. ve DUTTON, J. E. (1986) The Adoptation of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Emprical Analysis. Management Science, Volume 32, Issue 11, 1422-33.
  17. DOWNS, G. W. JR. ve MOHR, L. B. (1976) Conceptual Issues in Study of Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, No.4, 700-14.
  18. DUFRENE, U., WADSWORTH, F.H, BJORNSON, C., LITTLE, E. (1998) Evaluating Tangible Asset Investments: The Value of Cross Functional Teams, Management Research News, Volume 21, No. 10., 1-13.
  19. EVAN, W. M. (1966)
  20. Organizational Lag, Huma