Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12

Social Capital: Tragedy of Public or a New Edge for the Colonisation of Labour

Sosyal Sermaye: Kamunun Trajedisi ya da Emeğin Sömürgeleştirmesinde Yeni Bir Eşik

Pages
188–213
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Secondly, the language of the capital which enables the ideological liquidation of the idea of public by erasing all the traces of labour in the everyday life so to make the capitalistic values as a source of our social values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Concerning the question how the processes of social reproduction of labour in general and the poverty problem in particular are transformed, this study is devoted to the scrutiny of the concept of social capital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The social capital, from this question, relies on two critical conceptual tools: Firstly, the communities as a myth which also provides a sociological framework for the privatisation of the social well-being.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Secondly, the language of the capital which enables the ideological liquidation of the idea of public by erasing all the traces of labour in the everyday life so to make the capitalistic values as a source of our social values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Concerning the question how the processes of social reproduction of labour in general and the poverty problem in particular are transformed, this study is devoted to the scrutiny of the concept of social capital. The social capital, from this question, relies on two critical conceptual tools: Firstly, the communities as a myth which also provides a sociological framework for the privatisation of the social well-being. Secondly, the language of the capital which enables the ideological liquidation of the idea of public by erasing all the traces of labour in the everyday life so to make the capitalistic values as a source of our social values.

Özet

Bu çalışma emeğin toplumsal yeniden üretim süreçlerinin, özel olarak da yoksulluk algısının nasıl dönüştürüldüğü sorusu açısından sosyal sermaye kavramını incelemektedir. Bu amaçla sosyal sermayenin yaslandığı şu iki kritik kavramsal aracı ele almaktadır: İlki toplumsal refahın özelleştirilmesine sosyolojik çerçeve de sağlayan bir mit olarak topluluklar; ikincisi ise, emeğin bütün toplumsal izlerini gündelik hayattan silerek kapitalist değerleri toplumsal değerlerimizin kaynağı haline getiren ve böylece kamu fikrinin ideolojik tasfiyesine de olanak sağlayan sermaye dili.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZUĞURLU, A. (2022). Social Capital: Tragedy of Public or a New Edge for the Colonisation of Labour. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12, 188–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/433229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. AKDOĞAN, A. A. (2000) Sosyal Sermaye: Yeni Sağın Küresel Yüzü, Yoksulluk, Şiddet ve İnsan Hakları içinde, derl. Y. Özdek, Ankara:
  2. TODAİ, İnsan Hakları Araştırma ve Derleme Merkezi. ARTHURS, H. (2001) The Re-constitution of the Public Domain, Market or Public Domain: Global Governance and the Asymmetry of Power içinde, Derleyen Daniel Drache, London: Routledge. BAUMAN, Z. (1995)
  3. Sociology and Postmodernity, Class içinde, derl. P. Joyce, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. BOURDIEU, P. (2001)
  5. The Forms of Capital, The Sociology of Economic Life içinde, Derleyen M. Granovetter & R. Swedberg, Cambridge: Westview Press.
  6. BROWNE, P. L. (2000) The Neo-Liberal Uses of the Social Economy: Non-Profit Organizations and Workfare in Ontario, Social Economy: International Debates and Perspectives içinde, Derleyen J. M. Fonton Shragge, London: Black Rose Books. BUĞRA, A. (2001) Ekonomik Kriz Karşısında Türkiye'nin Geleneksel Refah Rejimi, Toplum ve Bilim, no 89, 22-30.
  7. CHAMPLIN, D. (1997)
  8. Culture, Natural Law, and the Restoration of Community, Journal of Economic Issues, no. 31, 575-584.
  9. CHANG, Ha-J. (2003) Kalkınma Reçetelerinin Gerçek Yüzü (Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategies in Historical Perspective). Çeviren T.A. Onmuş, İstanbul:
  10. İletişim. CLADIS, M. S. (1992) A Communitarian Defense of Liberalism: Emile Durkheim and Comtemporary Social Theory, Standford: Stanford University of Press.
  11. DİRLİK, A. (1994) The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism, Critiqual Inquiry, no. 20, 328-356.
  12. DRACHE, D. (2001) The Return of the Public Domain after the Triumph of Markets: Revisiting the Most Basic of Fundemantals, Market or Public Domain: Global Governance and the Asymmetry of Power içinde, derl. D. Drache, London: Routledge. ECEVİT, M. (2004)
  13. Tez Seminerleri Dizisi, Tartışma Toplantısı, 13 Mart 2004, ODTÜ: Ankara.
  14. ETZIONI, A. (1996)
  15. A Moderate Communitarian Proposal, Political Theory, no. 24, 155-171.
  16. EVANS, P. (der.) (1996)
  17. Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Creating Synergy across the Public-Private Divide, World Development, Special Section, no. 24. FINE, B. (2002) Economic Imperialism: a view from the periphery, Review of Radical Political Economics, no. 34, 187-201.
  18. FINE, B. (2001a) Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium, London-New York: Routledge. FINE, B. (2001b) Neither Washington nor Post-Washington Consensus: An Introduction, Neither Washington n