Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11

Evolution Idea in Economics and Technology Approach of Evolutionary Economics

İktisatta Evrim Düşüncesi ve Evrimci İktisatın Teknolojiye Yaklaşımı

Pages
24–44
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper focuses on the introduction of the idea of evolution into economics and the technological approach of evolutionary economics, which is increasingly becoming important in economics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Evolution has influenced economics since its emergence as a science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Starting with the last quarter of the 20th century, evolutionary approaches building up on the heritage of respectable philosophers of economics such as Schumpeter and Veblen have started put up strong criticisms against the neoclassical theory, especially on firms and technologies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper focuses on the introduction of the idea of evolution into economics and the technological approach of evolutionary economics, which is increasingly becoming important in economics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Evolution has influenced economics since its emergence as a science. Although economists have been influenced by the science of physics and the understanding of equilibrium of this science, the idea of evolution has maintained its significance in heterodox understandings of economics. Starting with the last quarter of the 20th century, evolutionary approaches building up on the heritage of respectable philosophers of economics such as Schumpeter and Veblen have started put up strong criticisms against the neoclassical theory, especially on firms and technologies. The paper focuses on the introduction of the idea of evolution into economics and the technological approach of evolutionary economics, which is increasingly becoming important in economics.

Özet

İktisat bir bilim olarak ortaya çıkışından itibaren evrim düşüncesiden etkilemiştir. İktisatçılar her ne kadar fizik biliminden ve bu bilimin denge kavramsallaştırmasından yoğun bir biçimde etkilenmiş olsalar da; evrim düşüncesi heterodoks ekonomi anlayışları üzerindeki etkisini sürdüregelmiştir. Schumpeter ve Veblen gibi iktisat düşünürlerinin düşünsel mirası üzerinde yükselen evrimci yaklaşımlar, 20. yüzyılın son çeyreği ile birlikte -firma ve teknoloji konuları başta olmak üzere- Neoklasik teoriye güçlü eleştiriler yöneltmeye başlamıştır. Bu çalışma iktisat bilimine evrim düşüncesinin girişi ve bu bilim dalında önemini giderek arttıran evrimci iktisadın teknoloji yaklaşımı üzerine odaklanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTEN, K. (2022). Evolution Idea in Economics and Technology Approach of Evolutionary Economics. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11, 24–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/433225

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. BASALLA, G. (2000) Teknolojinin Evrimi, çev. Cem Soydemir, Ankara:
  2. TÜBİTAK CLARK, N; C. J. (1988) “Evolutionary Theories in Economic Thought”, Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory içinde, London: Pinter, 197-218
  3. DAWKINS, R. (2002) Kör Saatçi, çev. Feryal Halatçı, Ankara:
  4. TÜBİTAK DEMİR, Ö. (1996)
  5. Kurumcu İktisat, Ankara:
  6. Vadi Yayınları.
  7. DOSI, G.; RICHARD R. N. (1994) “An Introduction to Evolutionary Theories in Economics”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4, 153-172.
  8. DOSI, G. (1988) ”The Nature of the Innovative Process”, G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory içinde, London: Pinter Publishers, 221-238
  9. DOSI, G.; SOETE L. (1988) “Technical Change and International Trade”, G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory içinde, London: Pinter Publishers, 401-431
  10. EKELUND, R. B.; HEBERT R. F. (1990) A History of Economic Theory and Method, New York: Mc Graw Hill Publishing FREEMAN, C.; SOETE L. (2003) Yenilik İktisadı, çev. Ergun Türkcan, Ankara:
  11. TÜBİTAK FREEMAN, C. (1992)
  12. The Economics of Hope, London: Pinter Publishers.
  13. HEILBRONER, R. L.(2003) İktisat Düşünürleri, çev. Ali Tartanoğlu, Ankara:
  14. Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.
  15. HODGSON, G. M.(1994) “Precursors of Modern Evolutionary Economics: Marx, Marshall, Veblen, and Schumpeter”, R. W. England(ed), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics içinde, The University of Michigan Press, 9-35
  16. METCALFE, J.S.; GIBBONS M.(1995) “Technological Variety and the Process of Competition”, G.M. Hodgson (ed), Economics and Biology içinde, Edward Elgar Publishing, 428-455
  17. NELSON, R. R. (1994) “The Coevolution of Technologies and Institutions”, R. W. England (ed), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics içinde, The University of Michigan Press,139-156
  18. PAVITT, K. (1984) “Patterns of technical change: towards a taxomony and a theory”, Research Policy, vol: 13, no:6, 343-374
  19. RADZICKI, M. J.; STERMAN J. D. (1994) “Evolutionary Economics and System Dynamics”, R. W. England (ed), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics içinde, The University of Michigan Press, 61-89.
  20. RUTTAN, V. (1959) ”Usher and Schumpeter on invention, innovation and technological change”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 596-606.
  21. SAMUELS, W.J.; SCHMID A. A.; SHAFFER J. D. (1994) “An Evolutionary Approach to Law and Economics”, R. W. England(ed),