SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

The Economic and Social Effects of Unemployment Insurance

İşsizlik Sigortasının Sosyal ve Ekonomik Etkileri

İ. Erdem SOFRACI
Pages
165–184
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the economic and social effects of UI, interacts with all the details of the program that applied.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study originates from the fact that unemployment insurance (UI) is a fiscal liability; and it should be treated within the system of social security.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of the research is to examine the relationship between characteristics of UI impact on social and economic condition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the economic and social effects of UI, interacts with all the details of the program that applied.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study originates from the fact that unemployment insurance (UI) is a fiscal liability; and it should be treated within the system of social security. The purpose of the research is to examine the relationship between characteristics of UI impact on social and economic condition. As in mentioned in the study, the characteristics of UI differ from other social security programs. Moreover, the unemployment concept that it protected is a result of the operation of the national economy. The protection systems that brought against also differ according to the economic and social structure of the society. Therefore, the economic and social effects of UI, interacts with all the details of the program that applied.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, işsizlik sigortasının sosyal ve ekonomik etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Bu çerçeveden hareketle, çalışmamızda işsizlik sigortasının nitelikleri, sosyal ve ekonomik açıdan değerlendirilerek birtakım bulgulara ulaşmak amaçlanmaktadır.İşsizlik sigortası diğer sosyal güvenlik programlarından nitelik yönünden farklılıklar göstermektedir. Zira güvence altına aldığı işsizlik olgusu, ülke ekonomisindeki işleyişin doğrudan bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Buna karşı getirilen korunma sistemleri de toplumların içinde bulunduğu ekonomik ve sosyal yapıya bağlı olarak değişmeler göstermektedir. Dolayısıyla işsizlik sigortasının ekonomik ve sosyal etkileri, uygulanan programın tüm detaylarıyla ilişki halindedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOFRACI, İ. E. (2022). The Economic and Social Effects of Unemployment Insurance. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 165–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/433209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. ATKINSON, A.B. ve Diğerleri (1984),
  2. Unemployment Benefit, Duration And Incentives In Britain, Journal of Public Economics, 23(3), 3-26.
  3. BAKER, M. (1992), Unemployment Duration: Compositional Effects and Cyclical Variability, The American Economic Review, 82(1), 313-321.
  4. BLANK, R.M. ve CARD, D.E. (1991), Recent Trends In Insured And Uninsured Unemployment: Is There An Explanation?, The Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 106(4), 1157-1189.
  5. BUDD, J.W. ve MCCALL, B.P. (1997), The Effect Of Unions On The Receipt Of Unemployment Insurance Benefits, Industrial And Labor Relations Review, 50(3), 478-492.
  6. CORAK, M. (1993), Is Unemployment Insurance Addictive?, Industrial And Labor Relations Review, 47(1), 63-72.
  7. DEERE, D.R. (1991), Unemployment Insurance And Employment, Journal Of Labor Economics, 9(4), 307-324.
  8. DİLİK, S. (1992), Sosyal Güvenlik, 2. Baskı,
  9. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara.
  10. FELDSTEIN, M. ve POTERBA, J. (1984), Unemployment Insurance And Reservation Wages, Journal Of Public Economics, 23(2), 141-167.
  11. HANSEN, G.D. ve IMROHOROĞLU, A. (1992), The Role Of Unemployment Insurance In An Economy With Liquidity Constraints And Moral Hazard, Journal Of Political Economy, 100(1), 118-142.
  12. HOPENHAYN, H.A. ve NICOLINI, J.P. (1997),
  13. Optimal Unemployment Insurance, Journal Of Political Economy, 105(2), 412-435.
  14. KATZ, L.F. ve MEYER, B.D. (1990), The Impact Of The Potential Duration Of Unemployment Benefits On The Duration Of Unemployment, Journal Of Public Economics, 41(1), 45-72.
  15. LAZEAR, E.P. (1990), Job Security Provisions And Employment, The Quarterly Journal Of Economics, Harward College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 699-726.
  16. LEVINE, P.B. (1993), Spillover Effects Between The Insured And Uninsured Unemployed, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(1), 73-86.
  17. MEYER, B.D. (1990), Unemployment Insurance And Unemployment Spells, Econometrica, 58(4), 757-782.
  18. SHAVELL, S. ve WEISS, L. (1979), The Optimal Payment of Unemployment Insurance Benefits Over Time, Journal Of Political Economy, 87(6), 1347–1359.
  19. SOLON, G. (1985), Work Incentive Effects Of Taxing Unemployment Benefits, Econometrica, 53(2), 295-306.
  20. TOPEL, R.H. (1983), On Layoffs and Unemployment Insurance, The American Economic Review, 73(4), 541-559.
  21. TÖRÜNER, M. (1992),
  22. İşsizlik Sigortası, Friedrich Ebert Vakfı Ekonomi ve Toplum Serisi, 2. Baskı,
  23. FES - İstanbul.
  24. TUNA, Y. (1995),
  25. İşsizlik Sigortasının Yapısı, Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Etkileri, DPT Uzmanlık Tezi, Yayın No. 2372, Ankara.