SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

Global Public Goods: Global Political Economy of Hegemony and Stability

Küresel Kamu Malları: Hegemonya ve İstikrarın Küresel Ekonomi Politiği

Süleyman ULUTÜRK
Servet AKYOL
Pages
62–85
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, the hegemonic stabilization theory and hegemony arguments are being studied within the scope of the literature of international political economics and/or global political economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a growing concern recently about the global public goods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This concern is not only in public finance, but also in economics, international relations and political sciences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the hegemonic stabilization theory and hegemony arguments are being studied within the scope of the literature of international political economics and/or global political economy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There has been a growing concern recently about the global public goods. This concern is not only in public finance, but also in economics, international relations and political sciences. Because of its multi-dimensional properties, global public goods are established in a multi-disciplinary position. The aim of this paper is to argue the subsistence of a leader and/or a hegemonic state at supplying the global public goods. In this context, the hegemonic stabilization theory and hegemony arguments are being studied within the scope of the literature of international political economics and/or global political economy.

Özet

Son yıllarda, küresel kamu malları konusundaki ilgi giderek artmaktadır. Bu ilgi sadece kamu maliyesinde değil, iktisat, uluslararası ilişkiler ve siyaset bilimi gibi alanlarda da gözlenmektedir. Küresel kamu malları çok boyutlu özelliğinden dolayı, disiplinler arası bir konuma yerleşmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, küresel kamu mallarının sunulmasında bir lider ve/veya hegemon devletin varlığını tartışmaktır. Bu bağlamda, hegemonik istikrar teorisi ve hegemonya tartışmaları uluslararası politik iktisat ve/veya küresel ekonomi politik literatürü kapsamında ele alınmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUTÜRK, S., AKYOL, S. (2022). Global Public Goods: Global Political Economy of Hegemony and Stability. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 62–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/433206

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. ARSAN, H.Ü (1992) “Kamu Maliyesi Alanında Yeni Bir İnceleme Konusu: Uluslararası Kamusal Mallar”, A.Ü. S.B.F. Dergisi, 47(1-2), 403-426.
  2. BALDWIN, D. A. (1993) “Neoliberalism, Neorealism and World Politics” Baldwin, D.A. (der.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism:Contemporary Debate içinde, Colombia University Press. New York, 3-25.
  3. BARRET, S. (2002) “Supplying International Public Goods: How Nations can Cooperate”, Ferroni, M. ve Mody, A. (der.) International Public Goods, Incentives, Measurement, and Financing içinde, Kluwer Academic Publishers and The World Bank, London, 47-79.
  4. BURNHAM, P. (1991) “Neo-Gramscian Hegemonya and the International Order” Capital and Class, 45, 73-92
  5. CONYBEARE, J. A.C. (1984) “Public Goods, Prisoners’ Dilemma and the International Political Economy”, International Studies Quarterly, 28, (1), 5-22.
  6. COX, R. W. (1993) “Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method”, Gill, S, (der.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations içinde, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 49-66.
  7. COX, R. W. (2004) “Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order”, New Political Economy, 9(3), 307-323.
  8. CRANE, G.T. ve AMAWI, A. (1997) “Introduction: Theories of International Political Economy” Crane, G.T.ve Amawi, A (der.) The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy içinde, Oxford University Press, New York, 3-34.
  9. DESAI, M (2003) “Public Goods: A Historical Perspective” Kaul, I. Conceicao P., Goulven, K. L. ve Ronald Mendoza, (der.) Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization içinde, Oxford University Press, New York, 63-77. http://www.globalpublicgoods.org/:19 Nisan 2005
  10. FERRONI, M. ve MODY, A. (2002) “Global Incentives for International Public Goods: Introduction and Overview”, (der.) Ferroni, M. ve Mody, A. International Public Goods, Incentives, Measurement,and Financing içinde, Kluwer Academic Publishers and The World Bank, London, 1-29.
  11. GILL, S ve LAW, D. (1988)
  12. The Global Political Economy, Harvester/Wheaesheaf, Hertfordshire. GILL, S ve LAW, D (1989) “Global Hegemony and Structural Power of Capital” International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475-499.
  13. GILLS, B. K. (2003) “Dünya Sisteminde Hegemonik Geçişler” Frank, A.G ve Gills, B.K. (der.) Dünya Sistemi içinde, İmge Kitapevi, Ankara, 235-279.
  14. GILPIN, R. (2001)
  15. Global Political Economy, Princeton University Press,
  16. New Jersey. GOLUB, P. S (2004) “Imperial politics, imperial will and the crisis of US heg