Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15

Different Approaches Among EU Russia and USA Towards European Security: Their Effects on the Transatlantic Alliance

Avrupa Birliği Rusya ve ABD'nin Avrupa Güvenliğine Farklı Yaklaşımlarının Transatlantik İttifakına Etkileri

Pages
170–195
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Otherwise, the split deepining within the transatlantic alliance will threaten the gains of the EU in its near abroad and the EU’s relations with Russia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The USA is on the one hand decreasing the financial and military commitments it is providing for the European security; on the other hand, tries to continue the regulatory role it has been playing in European security.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The end of the Cold War has brought both the USA’s role of responsibility, which has been assumed within the two polar system, and the continuety of NATO to the core of arguements on legacy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Otherwise, the split deepining within the transatlantic alliance will threaten the gains of the EU in its near abroad and the EU’s relations with Russia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The USA is on the one hand decreasing the financial and military commitments it is providing for the European security; on the other hand, tries to continue the regulatory role it has been playing in European security. The end of the Cold War has brought both the USA’s role of responsibility, which has been assumed within the two polar system, and the continuety of NATO to the core of arguements on legacy. The definition of the security role, which the EU and NATO will undertake in the future will be put into action only if it is realized through a comprimise among the EU, Russia and the USA. Otherwise, the split deepining within the transatlantic alliance will threaten the gains of the EU in its near abroad and the EU’s relations with Russia.

Özet

ABD bir yandan Avrupa güvenliği için sağladığı mali ve askeri taahhütleri azaltırken, diğer yandan Avrupa güvenliğinde o tarihe kadar oynadığı düzenleyici rolü sürdürmeye çalışmaktadır. Biten Soğuk Savaş, ABD’nin çift kutuplu düzen içinde üstlendiği Avrupa güvenliğinden sorumlu rolünü ve görev tanımı buna göre yapılmış NATO gibi uluslararası bir örgütün devamlılığını, meşruiyet tartışmalarının odağına taşımıştır. AB ve NATO’nun gelecekte üstleneceği güvenlik rolünün tanımı ancak AB-Rusya-ABD arasında varılacak bir uzlaşı ile yapılırsa işlerlik kazanacaktır. Aksi takdirde transatlantik ittifakı içerisinde derinleşecek olan çatlak AB’nin yakın çevresineki kazanımlarını ve Rusya ile ilişkilerini de tehdit edecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, S. (2022). Different Approaches Among EU Russia and USA Towards European Security: Their Effects on the Transatlantic Alliance. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15, 170–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/433190

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ASMUS, (2004) R. D. The Black Sea and the Frontiers of Freedom: Towards a new Euro-Atlantic strategy, Policy Review, Hoover Institution, Haziran-Temmuz 2004, http://hoover.org/ publications/policyreview/3437816.html, (Erişim: 13 Mart 2007).
  2. BLANK, S. (2004) NATO’s Drive to the East, In the National Interest, February 11, 2004, http://www.inthenationalinterest.com/ Articles/Vol3Issue6/Vol3Issue6BlankPFV.html, (Erişim: 25 Nisan 2005).
  3. BRETHERTON, C. ve VOGLER J. (1999)
  4. The European Union as a Global Actor, Routledge, London. CARNOVALE M. Der. (1995) European Security and International Institutions after the Cold War, Macmillan Press,
  5. London. CHIRAC, J. (2006) Riga Summit: the Europe-North America Link for Peace, Presidénce de la République, http://www.elysee.fr/elysee/ elysee.fr/anglais/speeches_and_documents/2006/riga_summit_comment_by_mr_jacques_chirac_president_of_the_french_republic.66988.html, (Erişim: 13 Mart 2007).
  6. CORDESMAN, A. H. (2002) The Role of Europe in the Middle East: An American Perspective, IISS/CEPS European Security Forum, Brussels, 11 March 2002, http://www.iiss.org/eusec/ cordesman.htm, (Erişim: 24 Nisan 2004).
  7. CORNISH, P. ve EDWARDS, (2001) G. Beyond the EU/NATO Dichotomy: the Beginnings of a European Strategic Culture, International Affairs, Cilt 77, Sayı 3, 2001, ss.587-603.
  8. COX, M. (1995)
  9. US Foreign Policy after the Cold War, Superpower without a Mission?, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London. CREMASCO, M. (1995) Successes and Failures of International Institutions in the Post-Yugoslav Crisis, Carnovale, M. (der.) European Security and International Institutions after the Cold War içinde, Macmillan Press,
  10. London. DAALDER, I. ve GOLDGEIER, J. (2006)
  11. Global NATO, Foreign Affairs, Cilt 85, Sayı 5, Eylül/Ekim 2006, p. 105-113, http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/delivery?vid=12&hid= 122&sid=ff84a9ec-1876-497e-81d8-b0875d79b52%40sessionmgr104, (Erişim: 26 Mart 2007).
  12. DANILOV, D. (2005)
  13. Russia and European Security, Dov Lynch (der.), What Russia Sees, Chaillot Paper, Sayı 74, Ocak 2005, http://www.iss-eu.org/chaillot/chai74.pdf, (Erişim: 6 Mart 2007)
  14. DROZDIAK, W. (2005)
  15. The North Atlantic Drift, Foreign Affairs, Cilt 84, Sayı 1, Ocak/Şubat 2005.
  16. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2002) Final Report on the Green Paper “Towards a European Strategy for the Security of Energy Supply”, COM (2002) 321 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/site/en/com/2002/com2002_ 0321en01.pdf, (Erişim: 6 Mart 2007).
  17. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2007) European Uni