SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 17

Normatif kurumsal mekanizmanın işletme stratejisi ile İKY modeli arasındaki ilişki üzerine etkisi

Moderating effect of normative institutional mechanism on the relationship between business strategy and HRM model

Yücel SAYILAR
Pages
154–188
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Business strategies focused on cost minimization and quality improvement were directly related to multiple practices of a soft HRM model, but subsequent analysis revealed that this main effect was the result of linking a HRM model with normative mechanism of institutional environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper tests predictions from institutional and strategic choice theory perspectives about business strategy-HRM model relationship through a study of organizations located in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results from a survey of 80 organizations primarily support an institutional approach to HRM.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Business strategies focused on cost minimization and quality improvement were directly related to multiple practices of a soft HRM model, but subsequent analysis revealed that this main effect was the result of linking a HRM model with normative mechanism of institutional environment.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper tests predictions from institutional and strategic choice theory perspectives about business strategy-HRM model relationship through a study of organizations located in Turkey. Results from a survey of 80 organizations primarily support an institutional approach to HRM. Business strategies focused on cost minimization and quality improvement were directly related to multiple practices of a soft HRM model, but subsequent analysis revealed that this main effect was the result of linking a HRM model with normative mechanism of institutional environment.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, işletme stratejisi ile insan kaynakları yönetimi (İKY) modeli arasındaki ilişki, Türkiye bağlamında kurumsalcı kuram ve stratejik seçim kuramı perspektiflerinden tartışılmaktadır. Seksen firmadan elde edilen veriler İKY’nde kurumsalcı perspektifin argümanlarını desteklemektedir. Maliyet minimizasyonu ve kalite geliştirmeye odaklanmış işletme stratejilerinin, esnek İKY modelinin çeşitli uygulamaları ile doğrudan ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ancak sonraki analizler söz konusu temel ilişkinin, İKY modeli konusunda kurumsal çevrenin ürettiği normatif etki mekanizması tarafından şekillendirildiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYILAR, Y. (2022). Normatif kurumsal mekanizmanın işletme stratejisi ile İKY modeli arasındaki ilişki üzerine etkisi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 17, 154–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/433187

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ABRAHAMSON, E. and ROSEN KOPF, L., (1993), “Institutional and Competitive Bandwagons: Using Mathematical Modeling as a Tool to Explore Innovation Diffusion”, Academy of Management Review, 18(3):487-517.
  2. ABRAHAMSON, E., (1991), “Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations”, Academy of Management Review, 16(3):586-612.
  3. ANDERSEN, J.C., RUNGTUSANATHAM, M. and SCHROEDER, R.G., “A Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method”, Academy of Management Review, 19(3):472-509
  4. ANG, S. and CUMMINGS, L.L., (1997), “Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing”, Organization Science, 8(3):235-256.
  5. ARTHUR, J.B., (1992), “The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(3):488-506.
  6. ARTHUR, J.B., (1994), “Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3):670-987. ASTLEY W.G. and VAN de VEN A.H., (1983), “Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly,28:245-273.
  7. AYCAN, Z., (2005), “The Interplay between Cultural and Institutional/Structural Contingencies in Human Resource Management Practices”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7):1083-1119.
  8. BAIRD, L. and MESHOULAM, I., (1988), “Managing Two Fits of Strategic Human Resource Management”, Academy of Management Review, 13(1):116-128.
  9. BARNEY, J.B. and WRIGHT, P.M., (1998), “On Becoming A. Strategic Partner: The Role of Human Resources in Gaining Competitive Advantage”, Human Resource Management, 37(1):31-46.
  10. BARNEY, J.B., (1991), “Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1):99-120.
  11. BARNEY, J.B., (2001), “Resource Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten Year Retrospective on the Resource Based View”, Journal of Management, 27:643-650.
  12. BARON, J.N. and DOBBIN, F.R. and JENNIGS, D.P., (1986), “War and Peace: The Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in U.S. Industry”, American Journal of Sociology, 92(2):350-383.
  13. BECKERT, J., (1999), “Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change: The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations”, Organization Studies, 20(5):777-799.
  14. BENDER, R., (2004), “Why Do Companies Use Performance-Related Pay for Their Executive Directors”, Corporate Governance, 12(4):521-533.
  15. BJÖRKMAN, I. / YUAN L., (2001), “Institutionali