Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

Agricultural total factor productivity and convergence analysis in Turkey and EU countries

Türkiye ve AB ülkelerinde tarımsal toplam faktör verimliliği ve yakınsama analizi

Pages
86–103
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to carried diagnosis, the sampling does not lay out sigma-convergence attitude however according to Nahar - Inder test except Bulgaria, Denmark, and Spain other 15 countries demostrate strong convergence toward sample mean.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study it is analysed in the period of 1962-2006 that whether agriculture of 17 EU members countries and candidate ( in the process of membership) Turkey denote convergence in terms of total factor productivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study consists of two stages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to carried diagnosis, the sampling does not lay out sigma-convergence attitude however according to Nahar - Inder test except Bulgaria, Denmark, and Spain other 15 countries demostrate strong convergence toward sample mean.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study it is analysed in the period of 1962-2006 that whether agriculture of 17 EU members countries and candidate ( in the process of membership) Turkey denote convergence in terms of total factor productivity. The study consists of two stages. At the first step total factor productivity of agriculture sectors provided with Malmquist index method. At the second step, in respect of Malmquist index values, it is searched whether existent countries indicate covergence in terms of agricultural total factor productivity; this research is actioned with boht sigma - covergence based on horizantal cross- section analyse that shows attutide of whole sampling and Nahar- Inder test based on time series analyse that provides to investigate inside sampling activity. According to carried diagnosis, the sampling does not lay out sigma-convergence attitude however according to Nahar - Inder test except Bulgaria, Denmark, and Spain other 15 countries demostrate strong convergence toward sample mean.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 17 AB ülkesi ile AB'ye üyelik sürecinde bulunan Türkiye'nin tarımsal toplam faktör verimliliği açısından yakınsama gösterip göstermediği 1962–2006 dönemi için incelenmektedir. Çalışma iki aşamadan oluşmaktadır. Birinci aşamada tarım sektörünün toplam faktör verimliliği Malmquist endeks yöntemi ile elde edilmektedir. İkinci aşamada ise Malmquist endeks değerlerinden hareketle, mevcut ülkelerin tarımsal toplam faktör verimliliği açısından yakınsama gösterip göstermedikleri, hem örneklemin bütününün davranışını gösteren yatay kesit analize dayalı sigma - yakınsama ile hem de örneklem içi hareketliliği ayrıştırmayı sağlayan zaman serisi analizine dayalı Nahar-Inder testi ile araştırılmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre örneklem ülkeleri sigma-yakınsama davranışı sergilememekte ancak Nahar-Inder testine göre ise Bulgaristan, İspanya ve Danimarka hariç diğer 15 ülke ortalamaya doğru yakınsama davranışı göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, R., MOLLAVELİOĞLU, M. Ş. (2022). Agricultural total factor productivity and convergence analysis in Turkey and EU countries. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 86–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/433171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. AVCI, M. A. ve KAYA, A. A. (2008), Geçiş Ekonomileri ve Türk Tarım Sektöründe Etkinlik ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği Analizi (1992-2004), Ege Akademik Bakış, 8(2):843-860.
  2. ARNADE, C. (1998) Using a Programming Approach to Measure International Agricultural Efficiency and Productivity, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 67—84. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. ve ULUCAN, A. (2005) Financial Efficiency of the Turkish Textile and Clothing Industry before the 2005
  3. Trade Liberalisation, Eurasian Review of Economics and Finance, 1 (4), 1—21. BARRO, R. J., SALA-I MARTIN, X. (1990) Economic Growth and Convergence Across the United States. NBER Working Paper No: 3419. BARRO, R. J. (1991) Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  4. BARRO, R. J. ve SALA-I MARTIN, X. (1992)
  5. Convergence, Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223-251.
  6. BAUMOL, W. J. (1986)
  7. Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show?, The American Economic Review, 76 (5), 1072-1085.
  8. BERNARD, A. B. ve DURLAUF, S. N. (1996) Interpreting Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis, Journal of Econometrics, 71,161-173.
  9. COELLI, T. J. ve RAO, D. S. P. (2003) Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agriculture: A Malmquist Index Analysis of 93 Countries, 1980-2000, International Association of Agricultural Economics (IAAE) Conference in Durban, August, 16-22.
  10. DOWRICK, S. ve NGUYEN, D. (1989) OECD Comperative Economic Growth 1950-85:
  11. Catch-Up and Convergence, The American Economic Review, 79 (5), 110-130.
  12. FARRELL, M. J. (1957) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
  13. FULGINITI, L. E. ve PERRIN, R.K. (1997) LDC Agriculture: Nonparametric Malmquist Productivity Index, Journal of Development Economics, 53, 373-390.
  14. FULGINITI, L. E. ve PERRIN, R. K. (1998) Agricultural Productivity in Developing Countries, Agricultural Economics, 19, 45-51.
  15. GALANOPOULOS, K., LINDBERG, E, SURRY, Y. ve MATTAS, K. (2006) Agricultural Productivity Growth in the Mediterranean and Tests of Convergence Among Countries, Paper prepared for presentation at the 98th EAAE Seminar 'Marketing Dynamics within the Global Trading System: New Perspectives', Chania, Crete, Greece as in: 29 June-2 July, 2006.
  16. GREASLEY, D. ve OXLEY, L. (1995) A Time Series Perspective on. Convergence: Australia, UK, and USA since 1870", Economic Record, 71, 259-270.
  17. GÜNDEN, C, MİRAN, B. ve SARI, M. A. (1998) Türk Tarımında Verimlilik