Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 27

Russia’s Caucasus and Central Asia politics during the past decade as part of its threat perceptions

Tehdit algılamaları ekseninde Rusya’nın yakın dönem Kafkasya ve Orta Asya politikası

Pages
176–203
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, Russia’s influence in the Caucasus and Central Asia has increased thanks to using the neorealist theory, while that of the USA has decreased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article analyzes the Caucasus and Central Asia politics of Russia in the axis of Russia’s threat perceptions between the years 2000-2013 within the framework of the neorealist theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thanks to its energy reserves, Russia increased its power sources in domestic policy and in foreign policy strengthened its military, economic and political structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, Russia’s influence in the Caucasus and Central Asia has increased thanks to using the neorealist theory, while that of the USA has decreased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article analyzes the Caucasus and Central Asia politics of Russia in the axis of Russia’s threat perceptions between the years 2000-2013 within the framework of the neorealist theory. Thanks to its energy reserves, Russia increased its power sources in domestic policy and in foreign policy strengthened its military, economic and political structures. Thanks to regional cooperation, local support and effective policies, Russia struggles more influentially against factors that endanger its security such as radical Islam and drug trafficking and could stop NATO’s gaining ground in these regions. As a result, Russia’s influence in the Caucasus and Central Asia has increased thanks to using the neorealist theory, while that of the USA has decreased.

Özet

Bu çalışmada tehdit algılamaları ekseninde 2000-2013 yılları arası ve sonrası dönem Rusya’nın Kafkaslar ve Orta Asya politikası neorealist teori perspektifinden incelenmiştir. Rusya, enerji rezervleri sayesinde iç politikada güç kaynaklarını artırarak, dış politikada ise Orta Asya ve Kafkasya’da askerî, siyasi ve ekonomik varlığını genişletmiştir. Bölgesel işbirliği, yerel destek ve güçlü politikalar sayesinde radikal İslam, uyuşturucu ticareti ve organize suç örgütleri gibi güvenliğini tehdit eden faktörlerle daha etkili mücadele edebilmekte ve NATO’nun doğuya ilerlemesini durdurabilmektedir. Sonuç olarak neoralist teoriyi uygulayan Rusya'nın Kafkasya ve Orta Asya'da nüfuzu artarken ABD’nin nüfuzu azalmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, E. (2022). Russia’s Caucasus and Central Asia politics during the past decade as part of its threat perceptions. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 27, 176–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/433129

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AB, (2013) http://www.energy.eu/stats/energy-natural-gas-reserves.html, (23.11.2013).
  2. ABDELAL, R. ve MİTROVA, T. (2013) U.S.-Russia Relations and the Hydrocarbon Markets of Eurasia. Working Group on the Future of U.S.- Russia Relations, Working Group Paper 2, January 2013,
  3. Cambridge. ATAMBAYEV, A. (2013: 19 Ekim) Pentagon verlässt Stützpunkt Manas in Kirgistan. http://de.ria.ru/security_and_military/20131019/267110261.html (19.10.2013).
  4. AÜR, Azerbaycan Ülke Raporu. (2011) http://www.turkishfurniture.org/TR/Genel/BelgeGoster.aspx?F6E1 0F8892433CFFAAF6AA849816B2EFA8C1ACAE68792171 (07.07.2011).
  5. BGR (2012)
  6. Reserven, Ressourcen und Verfügbarkeit von Energierohstoffen. Energiestudie 2012. Hanover: eigene BRAUNS, N. (2009, 19 Haziran) Dritte Kraft in der Türkei Hintergrund. Junge Welt, s.22. BREZEZINSKİ, Z. (1994, 3 Mart) World Order of the Future, Down (Karachi). CARR E. H. (1962) The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the study of International Relations, London: MacMillan (reprint of 2. edition, 1946).
  7. CENTRAL ASIA (2004) terrorism, religious extremism, and regional stability, Serial No. 108-71,
  8. Washington. CİHATZADE, N. (2009) Gürcistan-Rusya Savaşı’nın ardından Güney Kafkasya’da güvenlik, in: Laçiner, Sedat vd. (Ed.), Türk dış Politikası: Uluslararası III. Türk Dış Politikası Sempozyumu Tebliğleri içinde (s. 123- 131). Ankara.
  9. CLINTON Hillary Rodham (2012) Amerikas pazifisches Jahrhundert. Internationale Politik, IP 1, Januar/ Februar 2012. Bonn, s. 62-69.
  10. COHEN, A. (2009) “Russia: The Flawed Energy Superpower”, içinde Gal Luft and Anne Korin (eds.), Energy Securtiy Challenges for the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook. United States of America: Praeger Security International. CZEMPİEL, E.- O. (2003) Weltpolitik im Umbruch: Die Pax Americana, der Terrorismus und die Zukunft der internationalen Beziehungen. München: Verlag C. H. Beck BoHG, vierte Auflage. DAA Die Europäische Union und Russland., (2013) http://www.auswaertiges- amt.de/DE/Aussenpolitik/RegionaleSchwerpunkte/Russland/Russl and-und-EU_node.html. (28.11.2013).
  11. DOUGHERTY, J. ve PLATZGRAFF, R. L., Jr. (1990) Contending Theories, of International Relations. A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Harper Collins Publisher.
  12. DUBNOW, A. http://de.ria.ru/opinion/20120803/264120748.html (03.08.2012).
  13. EROL, M. S. (2012) Türkiye'nin Orta Asya Politikasına Rusya Federasyonu ve bölge ülkelerinden genel bir bakış, Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi, XII/1 (Yaz 2012), s.1-20.
  14. EİA, US. Energy Information