SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 30

TÜRKİYE KAPADOKYA BÖLGESİNDEKİ YÜKSEKÖĞRETİM KURUMLARINDA AKADEMİK LİDERLİK STİLLERİ VE STRATEJİK PLANLAMAYA DESTEK

ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP STYLES AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING AT HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN CAPPADOCIA REGION, TURKEY

Hüsniye AKILLI
Rüveyda ÖZASLAN KIZILBOĞA
Aylin ALKAYA
Serdar AKILLI
Pages
136–154
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Multiple regression analysis revealed that entrepreneurial leadership style has significant positive effect in fostering support for strategic planning activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although faculty support and effective academic leadership are crucial factors in successful implementation of strategic plans, there seems to be few studies which investigate the faculty support for strategic planning and the role of academic leadership styles in fostering support for strategic planning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We analyzed data acquired from 233 questionnaires which were gathered from academics who are employed at four year faculties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Multiple regression analysis revealed that entrepreneurial leadership style has significant positive effect in fostering support for strategic planning activities.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although faculty support and effective academic leadership are crucial factors in successful implementation of strategic plans, there seems to be few studies which investigate the faculty support for strategic planning and the role of academic leadership styles in fostering support for strategic planning. In this paper we present the results of an exploratory research project which was conducted at nine universities around Cappadocia Region in Turkey. We analyzed data acquired from 233 questionnaires which were gathered from academics who are employed at four year faculties. We examined group differences with ANOVA and t-tests, and we explored the relationship between support for strategic planning among faculty and the role of perceived academic leadership styles with multiple regression analysis. The findings show that academic titles, gender, disciplinary differences, and administrative roles have significant effects on support for strategic planning and perceived leadership styles. Multiple regression analysis revealed that entrepreneurial leadership style has significant positive effect in fostering support for strategic planning activities.

Özet

Öğretim üyelerinin desteği ve etkin akademik liderlik stratejik planların başarıyla uygulanmasında önemli faktörler olsa da bu konularla ilişkili çalışmaların az sayıda olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada Kapadokya bölgesinde bulunan dokuz üniversitede gerçekleştirilen keşfedici bir araştırma projesinin sonuçları sunulmaktadır. Dört yıllık lisans eğitimi veren fakültelerde görevli öğretim üyelerinden elde edilen 233 anket analiz edilmiştir. Grup farklılıkları ANOVA ve t-testleri, öğretim üyelerinin stratejik planlamaya destekleri ve algılanan liderlik stilleri arasındaki ilişkiler ise çoklu regresyon ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular akademik unvan, cinsiyet, disipliner farklılıklar ve yönetici rolü değişkenleri açısından anlamlı farklılıklar olduğunu göstermiştir. Çoklu regresyon analizi girişimci liderlik stilinin stratejik planlama faaliyetlerine destek konusunda anlamlı pozitif etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKILLI, H., KIZILBOĞA, R. Ö., ALKAYA, A., AKILLI, S. (2022). TÜRKİYE KAPADOKYA BÖLGESİNDEKİ YÜKSEKÖĞRETİM KURUMLARINDA AKADEMİK LİDERLİK STİLLERİ VE STRATEJİK PLANLAMAYA DESTEK. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 30, 136–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/433117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ALTBACH, P. G., REISBERG, L., & RUMBLEY, L. E. (2009) Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Executive Summary. Paris: UNESCO. ARSLAN, M. M. (2009) Strategic planning process in higher education, Milli Egitim, no. 182, 391-399.
  2. ASKLING, B., & STENSAKER, B. (2002). Academic leadership: Prescriptions, practices and paradoxes. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(2), 113-125.
  3. AYDIN, M. D., & AKSOY, S. (2007) Strategic planning and reflections on employees: the case of Hacettepe University. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 293-322.
  4. BARKHOLT, K. (2005) The Bologna process and integration theory: Convergence and autonomy. Higher Education in Europe, Vol.30, No.1, pp.23-29
  5. BIRNBAUM, R. (1988) How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Josey Bass. BIRNBAUM, R. (1999). Academic leadership at the millennium: Politics or porcelain? Academe, 85(3), 14-19.
  6. BIRNBAUM, R. (2000) The life cycle of academic management fads. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 1-16.
  7. BRAUN, D. (1999) Changing governance models in higher education: The case of the new managerialism, Swiss Political Science Review, Vol.5, No.3, pp.1-24.
  8. BRYMAN, A. (2007) Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32:6, 693-710
  9. CLARK, B.R. (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organisational pathways of transformation. Guildford: IAU Pergamon/Elsevier. COHEN, M.D. & MARCH, J.G. (1986) Leadership and Ambiguity. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. YODEK (Commision of Academic Assessment and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education) (2007). Guidline on academic assessment and quality enhancement in higher education. Ankara:
  10. YODEK. ÇINGI, H. (1994). Örnekleme Kuramı. Ankara. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Yayinlari DEEM, R. (2010) Herding the academic cats. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14(2), 37-43.
  11. DORRIS, M.J., KELLEY J.M. & TRAINER J.F. (2002) Strategic Planning in Higher Education, New Directions for Higher Education, no.116, 5-11.
  12. GALLOS, J. (2002) The dean's squeeze: the myths and realities of academic leadership in the middle. Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, 174-184
  13. GAYLE, D. J., TEWARIE, B., & WHITE, A. Q. (2003) Governance in the twenty-first century university: Approaches to effective leadership and strategic management. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(1), 1-40.
  14. GENC, N. (2009) St